- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Just watched the Trump speech from Gettysburg in which he outlined his plan for the First 100 Days. He spent the first part airing his grievances against the media and saying that Hillary Clinton never should have been allowed to run because the Obama administration covered up her crimes and refused to prosecute her. A light bulb went on for me and I wonder if anyone else sees it also.
Trump can see himself losing and has already talked about the possibility of challenging the results. Most people think that means demonstrating something wrong with the count or proving voter fraud. What if that is not it at all? What if it is not about the results of the vote but the idea that any vote for Clinton in the first place should be null and void according to his claim that she should not even have been allowed to run?
Discounting all the votes for Clinton would give him victories in 50 states - or maybe 49 if Utah votes for neither one - and would obviously give him the election.
I seriously wonder if this is his end game.
Your thoughts and speculation are welcome.
Trump can see himself losing and has already talked about the possibility of challenging the results. Most people think that means demonstrating something wrong with the count or proving voter fraud. What if that is not it at all? What if it is not about the results of the vote but the idea that any vote for Clinton in the first place should be null and void according to his claim that she should not even have been allowed to run?
Discounting all the votes for Clinton would give him victories in 50 states - or maybe 49 if Utah votes for neither one - and would obviously give him the election.
I seriously wonder if this is his end game.
Your thoughts and speculation are welcome.