- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,543
- Reaction score
- 680
- Location
- East Coast USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Meet Trumps VP choice.
Meet Trumps VP choice.
Meet Trumps VP choice.
Meet Trumps VP choice.
Except I'm fairly sure Tump has chosen his VP running mate, and it isn't Newt.
Cute line in xenophobic bluster though. Immigration official: "Excuse me, Sir. Are you now or have you ever been a believer in Shari'a?" "No, officer." "That's fine then, Sir. In you come." Fail safe system, isn't it?
I guess I could go along with this as long as we also deport every christian, citizen or not, who believes christian religious law should take precedent over American law. We could start with Trump's actual VP pick, the christian taliban spokesperson, Mike Pence.
That's just the thing. It's never been about realistic solutions with these people, it's just pandering to the base with hateful rhetoric that has absolutely zero chance of being implemented in real life. Trying to deport people based on something that exists entirely in their heads is laughable but pretty much par for the course.
How does America avoid the development of no go zones and Sharia courts that parts of Europe now enjoy ?
You mean those totally Muslim cities like Birmingham where no white Christian police officer would ever set foot? Yeah, what to do about those?How does America avoid the development of no go zones and Sharia courts that parts of Europe now enjoy ?
How does America avoid the development of no go zones and Sharia courts that parts of Europe now enjoy ?
Do you even understand the sharia "courts." Sharia law is practiced in our country right now. Voluntarily. By contract. With arbitrators who are experts. No law can be broken. But rights are given up by agreement...by contract. People give up rights allll the time by signing them away in a contract.
Who are you...we...to say people cannot live by Sharia Law if they so choose AS LONG AS none of our criminal laws are broken.
If they don't break any of our laws under Sharia law they are not following Sharia law. As their beliefs do not match ours. You say "as long as none of our laws are broken". Thus we..... you are saying to those people they cannot fully live by Sharia law. Am I wrong?
I think the difference between Christian laws and Sharia law, is that Sharia law governs more than just that persons relationshipBy this logic, Christians can't voluntary follow ANY Christian laws because SOME Christian laws are incompatible with American laws. That makes no sense. People can voluntarily act as ridiculous as they want to and subject themselves to whatever they want. It's like the Scientologists who allow themselves to be put in "re-education camps".
By this logic, Christians can't voluntary follow ANY Christian laws because SOME Christian laws are incompatible with American laws. That makes no sense. People can voluntarily act as ridiculous as they want to and subject themselves to whatever they want. It's like the Scientologists who allow themselves to be put in "re-education camps".
You mean those totally Muslim cities like Birmingham where no white Christian police officer would ever set foot? Yeah, what to do about those?
Do you mean those areas that do not exist? That Fox commentator has never set foot in Birmingham. Did you actually read the link that you posted?
I think the difference between Christian laws and Sharia law, is that Sharia law governs more than just that persons relationship
with their chosen deity, but is a complete political ideology.
Meet Trumps VP choice.
There you are wrong. If a person wants to follow the laws of their religion but can't because it is not in accordance with our laws they are not following their belief fully in this country. That is a fact. If they did follow their belief fully and it was not in accordance with our laws they are breaking our laws and would be punished.
Sure people can voluntarily act ridiculous as they want but don't break our laws in doing so. And under Sharia law much of what they believe if acted on would be breaking our laws, thus they would be punished. Fact.
So we do tell people they can not follow their version of their belief when it is in conflict with our laws. That is a fact.
We're not talking acting stupid.
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Please give an example in the US or Europe of religious law trumping actual law. This has not happened and you're simply spreading fear. If a christian or a muslim wants to follow their religious laws, fine, as long as it doesn't conflict with ours. I don't know why you find that so atrocious. Do you hate religious liberty so much?