• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP’s Benghazi Committee just keeps going (and going)

Socrates1 said:
And the information keeps sloooooowly coming out and slooooowly drip by drip , two years to release emails , 147 FBI agents , WH and DOJ running interference !!!
Click to expand...

I see this as the PUB controlled Congress figured out pretty early no real smoking gun exists in this, some embarrassment at best but crap onna cracker she survived and thrived after her husband used a cigar case to do an intern!!!! :shock:

So they decided to copy an old 'Laugh-In' gag*... they were going to make this cloud of smoke last for years... since they figure no real damage done to the country then perhaps they can create political damage to Hillary by a constant drip of not much to try and create a 'There has got to be a fire here somewhere' mantra even if it is the PUBs using the crap out of E-Cigarettes... :roll:

* Laugh-Gag- "The San Francisco fire department was called in this weekend to burn 500 pounds of pot. The Chief was interviewed before the burn and is quoted as saying- "Using all our modern fire control equipment and training we should be able to keep this going for at least a week!" :lamo
 
Socrates1 said:
And the information keeps sloooooowly coming out and slooooowly drip by drip , two years to release emails , 147 FBI agents , WH and DOJ running interference !!! :roll:
Click to expand...


Kind of off subject and a tad bit hysterical........ wouldn't you agree?

and BTW

NO WRONG DOING FOUND..............

My friend.........

There is no there there
 
imyoda said:
Kind of off subject and a tad bit hysterical........ wouldn't you agree?

and BTW

NO WRONG DOING FOUND..............

My friend.........

There is no there there
Click to expand...

yep , ALL 147 FBI agents have to be wrong !:roll:
 
imyoda said:
Kind of off subject and a tad bit hysterical........ wouldn't you agree?

and BTW

NO WRONG DOING FOUND..............

My friend.........

There is no there there
Click to expand...

Well why waste the time with 147 FBI agents ??? :lol:
 
This just in, state department has been less than forthright with discovery:

https://sharylattkisson.com/the-amazing-reappearing-benghazi-documents/
It only took 3-1/2 years but the State Department has turned over new, previously undisclosed documents to the House Benghazi Committee. No word as to what’s contained in them. According to a committee spokesman, the documents come from the office of the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In a court filing, the State Department reportedly said it only recently discovered the documents.
Click to expand...

https://benghazi.house.gov/news/pre...nt-finally-turns-over-records-committee-still
April 8, 2016
| Press Release
Washington, D.C. — Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (SC-04) released the following statement after the committee today received from the State Department a production of more than 1,100 pages of records, including files stored on network folders used by senior employees within the Office of the Secretary, and emails from Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, Huma Abedin, Susan Rice, and Patrick Kennedy:
Click to expand...

Hard to get at the truth when pertinent information is hidden or not given in a prompt manner. This would seem at odds with the idea of wanting to get to the bottom of the issue.
 
Socrates1 said:
yep , ALL 147 FBI agents have to be wrong !:roll:
Click to expand...

Is that so..................my friend.........if you feel the need to make "noise"...........please do it at least with something of substance
 
imyoda said:
Is that so..................my friend.........if you feel the need to make "noise"...........please do it at least with something of substance
Click to expand...

If facts upset you , move on ! :roll:
 
Socrates1 said:
If facts upset you , move on ! :roll:
Click to expand...

Could you lest a few of those facts..............and explain how HRC broke the law............and therefore deserves to be indicted...........

Could ya?

as I said.......Just more empty noise fro the empty drum called the RW extremists........


The list.........lets get a snappin'
 
imyoda said:
Could you lest a few of those facts..............and explain how HRC broke the law............and therefore deserves to be indicted...........

Could ya?

as I said.......Just more empty noise fro the empty drum called the RW extremists........


The list.........lets get a snappin'
Click to expand...

Are you really that naïve ? :roll:
 
OpportunityCost said:
This just in, state department has been less than forthright with discovery:

https://sharylattkisson.com/the-amazing-reappearing-benghazi-documents/


https://benghazi.house.gov/news/pre...nt-finally-turns-over-records-committee-still


Hard to get at the truth when pertinent information is hidden or not given in a prompt manner. This would seem at odds with the idea of wanting to get to the bottom of the issue.
Click to expand...

Clearly, if she isn't found guilty of something, the only possible explanation is that we do not have enough information.

This explains why republicans are so happy to spend all this public money digging in the mud to attack their political opponents.
 
Absentglare said:
Clearly, if she isn't found guilty of something, the only possible explanation is that we do not have enough information.

This explains why republicans are so happy to spend all this public money digging in the mud to attack their political opponents.
Click to expand...

This is a convenient way of dodging accountability. Cabinet members are to be transparent and accountable. Hillary has not been. If they are digging in mud, perhaps that's because Hillary leaves a lot of dirt to dig into.
 
Socrates1 said:
Are you really that naïve ? :roll:
Click to expand...


Possibly..........but well informed.......

BTW

Making a personal attack to distract from the facts does not improve your argument...........Did you know that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom