• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mark Levin endorses Ted Cruz for President

vesper said:
What part don't you understand NonoBadDog? His contract with his radio program did not allow him to endorse anyone. His new Levin TV is not under the same contract and on the third episode of his TV program he endorsed Cruz.

And a hell of an endorsement it was!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Good deal then. I like Levin and think people will really listen to him.
 
cpwill said:
Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is a well thought out and thoroughly argued, reasoned, and sourced response. Congratulations, countryboy, you managed to make a scatological reference. :roll:
Click to expand...

Sometimes succinct is all that's called for. Especially when in response to such a, well, bull**** post. :shrug:
 
cabse5 said:
Oh, that is why Sessions of Alabama backs Trump? No, I'm guessing Sessions backs Trump because Cruz DOESN'T do those things you've enumerated.
Click to expand...

Don't know, don't care. If think Trump is a conservative and Cruz isn't, you need to get out of that Bizzaro world that you are in.
 
disneydude said:
Further proof that Mr. Green Eggs and Ham is an extreme right-winger. Levin is an idiot who's radio program attracts only the fringiest of the fringe. If Green Eggs and Ham was able to get the nomination, the Dems would have a field day with this (Unfortunately, Trump will have the nomination wrapped up by mid-April).
Click to expand...

Let's see... they're all "extreme right wingers", the democrats will win every election, and Levin, well known as a brilliant lawyer who is a patriot and supports OUR rights in the Constitution, is an idiot. So, nothing new.

Why don't you surprise us one day with some critical thinking? That would be refreshing. How about a reply with some thoughts on why the Democrats might lose some elections or serious problems with Hillary or Sanders?
 
I have MANY problems with Hillary. Her and Bill have always been was to moderate for my tastes and way to tied to corporate America. She is also a war-hawk like most of the Republicans. The only reason I support her is because I think nominating Sanders would be the only way to give the Presidency to the Republicans.

Are all Republicans right-wingers? No. I wouldn't call Kasich a right-winger....not was Jeb a right-winger. So you can stop with your knee-jerk reactionism.

As for Levin.....he IS an idiot. He is a shockjock right-wing radio host who displays outrageous behavior simply to appease his foaming at the mouth/drooling listeners. He is probably the most annoying on the air right now. I can't stand to listen to his whiney voice for more than 5 minutes.
 
Crovax said:
And how exactly will Trump? Building that wall, which apparently Mexico will pay for? How does that stop the majority of illegal immigrants who come in on visas (which Trump now once again supports) and overstay them?
Click to expand...
Seems there isn't much support from any political candidate to send undocumenteds back to Mexico. For example, Cruz and Rubio won't. They're 'hamstrung' by the law. What I mean by hamstrung is legal precedents have been established that run counterintuitive to the deportation of undocumenteds and counterintuitive to The Constitution. For example, the 'anyone born in the US is automatically a US citizen' edict from the judiciary that is - a derivative?? - of the 14th amendment.

Trump (with the aid of Sessions) has realized one way to deport undocumenteds is to have the 'anyone born on American soil is an American citizen' edict declared unconstitutional. Prepare for a long battle on this. Prepare that law and ideology is not on the side of those who wish to deport undocumenteds.

The US could also defund undocumenteds. Give them an incentive to leave on their own.

Ask Ted his plan to deport undocumenteds already living in the US. He stutters then shifts topics.
 
Last edited:
cabse5 said:
Seems there isn't much support from any political candidate to send undocumenteds back to Mexico. For example, Cruz and Rubio won't. They're 'hamstrung' by the law. What I mean by hamstrung is legal precedents have been established that run counterintuitive to the deportation of undocumenteds and counterintuitive to The Constitution. For example, the 'anyone born in the US is automatically a US citizen' edict from the judiciary that is - a derivative?? - of the 14th amendment.

Trump (with the aid of Sessions) has realized one way to deport undocumenteds is to have the 'anyone born on American soil is an American citizen' edict declared unconstitutional. Prepare for a long battle on this. Prepare that law and ideology is not on the side of those who wish to deport undocumenteds.

The US could also defund undocumenteds. Give them an incentive to leave on their own.

Ask Ted his plan to deport undocumenteds already living in the US. He stutters then shifts topics.
Click to expand...

That was Mitt Romney's plan in 2012.

Lets see what Trump said about that: “He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal,” Trump says. “It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,” Trump notes. “He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.”

Guess you dont know Trump as well as you thought, but dat wall tho
 
And speaking of Limbaugh, do you suppose that if he endorses one of the candidates, his endorsement will be valuable?

I guess I should define "valuable" here: An endorsement gains votes.
 
Crovax said:
That was Mitt Romney's plan in 2012.

Lets see what Trump said about that: “He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal,” Trump says. “It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,” Trump notes. “He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.”

Guess you dont know Trump as well as you thought, but dat wall tho
Click to expand...
I don't remember which debate and the circumstances in which he said it, but I know Trump on more than one occasion has rebutted a statement that deporting would be impossible and illegal to accomplish - O'Reilly interview I do remember -. Trump's response was, "I have 'people' who would disagree with you." By people he means Sessions.
 
Last edited:
Crovax said:
That was Mitt Romney's plan in 2012.

Lets see what Trump said about that: “He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal,” Trump says. “It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,” Trump notes. “He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.”

Guess you dont know Trump as well as you thought, but dat wall tho
Click to expand...
Your view of Trump's flip-flopping is not a flip-flop. Trump is currently greatly concerned with the federal debt. I'm not sure how he felt about debt when he made those disparaging comments about deporting undocumenteds...

Studies have shown the US spends over 110 billion dollars a year on undocumenteds. The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers (2013)

Trump thinks, 'how about reining in those costs to help in lowering the debt?'
 
disneydude said:
I have MANY problems with Hillary. Her and Bill have always been was to moderate for my tastes and way to tied to corporate America. She is also a war-hawk like most of the Republicans. The only reason I support her is because I think nominating Sanders would be the only way to give the Presidency to the Republicans.

Are all Republicans right-wingers? No. I wouldn't call Kasich a right-winger....not was Jeb a right-winger. So you can stop with your knee-jerk reactionism.

As for Levin.....he IS an idiot. He is a shockjock right-wing radio host who displays outrageous behavior simply to appease his foaming at the mouth/drooling listeners. He is probably the most annoying on the air right now. I can't stand to listen to his whiney voice for more than 5 minutes.
Click to expand...

See, a post like that gets you no respect at all. Name calling, generalizations, zero facts to back up anything you say.

I can say both HRC and BS are left wing lunatics, because I also back it up with the facts that they want government mandated healthcare, they would love to eliminate the second amendment, and have no problem at all taking our liberties to make the government more powerful.

Then your little rant about Levin is just factually incorrect, while long on name calling and short on facts, as usual. And all that after 5 entire minutes of listening to him. Very convincing!
 
cpwill said:
No, Sessions backed Trump because it looked like Cruz was failing, and Sessions got suckered.
Click to expand...
That's right. Nobody of any intelligence could ever voluntarily support Trump. Go ahead and keep telling yourself that. It's a sick sad world you have in your head if that's what you think about your fellow Americans.
 
Anthony60 said:
See, a post like that gets you no respect at all. Name calling, generalizations, zero facts to back up anything you say.

I can say both HRC and BS are left wing lunatics, because I also back it up with the facts that they want government mandated healthcare, they would love to eliminate the second amendment, and have no problem at all taking our liberties to make the government more powerful.

Then your little rant about Levin is just factually incorrect, while long on name calling and short on facts, as usual. And all that after 5 entire minutes of listening to him. Very convincing!
Click to expand...

You don't have to listen to more than 5 minutes of an idiot to know that he is an idiot. In fact....I would go as far as to say that anyone who would spend more than five minutes listening to an idiot is probably a bigger idiot than the broadcaster. Whenever I have had the misfortune of coming across Levin on the airwaves, it become abundantly clear within a couple of minutes that he is so full of ****....all he is doing is spouting the same propaganda over and over. Sorry. There are some conservative broadcasters that have a little bit of credibility , Michael Medved for one. Levin, sadly isn't one of them.
 
reinoe said:
That's right. Nobody of any intelligence could ever voluntarily support Trump. Go ahead and keep telling yourself that. It's a sick sad world you have in your head if that's what you think about your fellow Americans.
Click to expand...
LOL Trump betrayed Sessions ON STAGE, and then all but admitted he's intended to do so all along. Yeah, Sessions got suckered.
 
cpwill said:
Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is a well thought out and thoroughly argued, reasoned, and sourced response. Congratulations, countryboy, you managed to make a scatological reference. :roll:
Click to expand...

Brevity, is the soul of wit. Don't you know? By the way, however scatological the reference bull**** is, it is still quite accurate and apropos.
 
PirateMk1 said:
Brevity, is the soul of wit. Don't you know? By the way, however scatological the reference bull**** is, it is still quite accurate and apropos.
Click to expand...
Wit requires thought. Simply responding "bull****" is mindless.
 
disneydude said:
You don't have to listen to more than 5 minutes of an idiot to know that he is an idiot. In fact....I would go as far as to say that anyone who would spend more than five minutes listening to an idiot is probably a bigger idiot than the broadcaster. Whenever I have had the misfortune of coming across Levin on the airwaves, it become abundantly clear within a couple of minutes that he is so full of ****....all he is doing is spouting the same propaganda over and over. Sorry. There are some conservative broadcasters that have a little bit of credibility , Michael Medved for one. Levin, sadly isn't one of them.
Click to expand...

Michael Medved?? He strikes me as a pompous ass whenever I listen to him.
 
cpwill said:
Wit requires thought. Simply responding "bull****" is mindless.
Click to expand...

No its not mindless. Its accurate, to the point, and succinct. Especially in response to the quip the "establishment" equates to merely "not my preferred candidate." Please. Most people know better.
 
PirateMk1 said:
No its not mindless. Its accurate, to the point, and succinct. Especially in response to the quip the "establishment" equates to merely "not my preferred candidate." Please. Most people know better.
Click to expand...
Half the populace had a below average IQ. They are more likely to be unable to offer reasoned argument, and so rely on outbursts such as "bull****!"

Establishment has come to mean nothing. There is no such unified force.
 
cpwill said:
Half the populace had a below average IQ. They are more likely to be unable to offer reasoned argument, and so rely on outbursts such as "bull****!"

Establishment has come to mean nothing. There is no such unified force.
Click to expand...

No half the population doesn't have below average IQ that's a misnomer. Most of the population has the average mean IQ. Hence they more than likely explain, if they so choose, why the "establishment" is in fact more than nothing. They could also explain why they should be run out of town strapped to high powered rockets. Most people can point out who they believe the major players of the establishment cabal to be. The players named tend to be pretty darn consistent. The Bushes, Gram, McConnell ect. You are essentially claiming the establishment is a figment of peoples imaginations. At least that's how it comes across. Bull****? Indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom