imyoda
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 6, 2012
- Messages
- 5,731
- Reaction score
- 1,025
- Location
- Sarasota, Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
The evidence you quoted:
You complained about smearing Shrillary then you quoted that. Then you, ironically, smeared the source. I guess you have two standards. It even gave me a chuckle. That is pretty hypocritical. You NEVER refuted the accusation but you were quick to accuse someone of smearing just before you started smearing him. I think that is what they call "diversion".
Let's try to stay focused on the subject Mr. No-no ………the “so-called over top secret" emails/info"................
Rather than trying to make me the subject of your naïve belief in anything RW as slam-dunk facts……….
And since you decided to go on a toot-toot trip rather than citing the facts you claim exist……….
Let me help you……….
“………Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP). …………
“…………………Fox News is told that the recent IG letter was sent to the leadership of the House and Senate intelligence committees and leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and State Department inspector general…..
“………………..It is alarming that the intelligence community IG, working with Republicans in Congress, continues to selectively leak materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign….
Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News
Burr denies leaking IG letter on Clinton emails
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., told reporters that he had been in touch with Charles McCullough, the intelligence community's inspector general, earlier last year when he and Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the chairman of Foreign Relations Committee, asked him to determine whether Clinton's server and thumb-drive were secure. Clinton's camp has since accused McCullough of conspiring with Republicans to leak out his finding….
……... In McCullough's letter to Burr and Corker, he said Clinton had sent or received information classified above top secret. Fallon argues that the email McCullough was referring to was nothing more than a New York Times story about drones that had been forwarded to Clinton.
"I think most Americans, if they saw the actual emails, would agree that it is a fabrication to suggest the forwarding of a news article should be treated as a mishandling of classified information," Fallon argued”
Clinton blames GOP for classified email report | Washington Examiner
Clinton aide: Watchdog colluding with Republicans on emails | TheHill
“…..an article published in early November in which Politico quoted an anonymous source that undermined Inspector General Charles McCullough's public concerns about the emails…….
………. "This is fundamentally the same issue that's been going on since this summer," he said. "What's going on is we have an inter-agency dispute about what's classified and what's not. The State Department has attested these emails that were on Hillary Clinton's server were not classified at the time they were sent or received."
Report: Intelligence officials walk back claim Clinton emails were 'top secret' | Washington Examiner
Clinton: Email classification changes 'nothing' - POLITICO
…The Clinton campaign dismissed the finding by referring to "the same interagency dispute that has been playing out for months." In a statement, the campaign said the finding "does not change the fact that these emails were not classified at the time they were sent or received."
The campaign added: "It is alarming that the intelligence community IG, working with Republicans in Congress, continues to selectively leak materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The Justice Department's inquiry should be allowed to proceed without any further interference."
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics...ils-on-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret
And the over top secret information was in an email sent to Clinton about a New York Times article about drones………..REALLY NOW!
But you’ll never see that reported in Faux Noise and all the other RW slander sheets………… AND THEM THE FACTS FRIEND……………DEAL WITH IT
BTW
I just loved the "Shrillary" reference............ Was that a flight of inspiration?.................Or just a typo?