• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs

The evidence you quoted:


You complained about smearing Shrillary then you quoted that. Then you, ironically, smeared the source. I guess you have two standards. It even gave me a chuckle. That is pretty hypocritical. You NEVER refuted the accusation but you were quick to accuse someone of smearing just before you started smearing him. I think that is what they call "diversion".

Let's try to stay focused on the subject Mr. No-no ………the “so-called over top secret" emails/info"................
Rather than trying to make me the subject of your naïve belief in anything RW as slam-dunk facts……….

And since you decided to go on a toot-toot trip rather than citing the facts you claim exist……….

Let me help you……….

“………Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP). …………

“…………………Fox News is told that the recent IG letter was sent to the leadership of the House and Senate intelligence committees and leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and State Department inspector general…..

“………………..It is alarming that the intelligence community IG, working with Republicans in Congress, continues to selectively leak materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign….
Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs | Fox News


Burr denies leaking IG letter on Clinton emails
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., told reporters that he had been in touch with Charles McCullough, the intelligence community's inspector general, earlier last year when he and Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the chairman of Foreign Relations Committee, asked him to determine whether Clinton's server and thumb-drive were secure. Clinton's camp has since accused McCullough of conspiring with Republicans to leak out his finding….
……... In McCullough's letter to Burr and Corker, he said Clinton had sent or received information classified above top secret. Fallon argues that the email McCullough was referring to was nothing more than a New York Times story about drones that had been forwarded to Clinton.
"I think most Americans, if they saw the actual emails, would agree that it is a fabrication to suggest the forwarding of a news article should be treated as a mishandling of classified information," Fallon argued”
Clinton blames GOP for classified email report | Washington Examiner
Clinton aide: Watchdog colluding with Republicans on emails | TheHill

“…..an article published in early November in which Politico quoted an anonymous source that undermined Inspector General Charles McCullough's public concerns about the emails…….
………. "This is fundamentally the same issue that's been going on since this summer," he said. "What's going on is we have an inter-agency dispute about what's classified and what's not. The State Department has attested these emails that were on Hillary Clinton's server were not classified at the time they were sent or received."
Report: Intelligence officials walk back claim Clinton emails were 'top secret' | Washington Examiner
Clinton: Email classification changes 'nothing' - POLITICO

…The Clinton campaign dismissed the finding by referring to "the same interagency dispute that has been playing out for months." In a statement, the campaign said the finding "does not change the fact that these emails were not classified at the time they were sent or received."

The campaign added: "It is alarming that the intelligence community IG, working with Republicans in Congress, continues to selectively leak materials in order to resurface the same allegations and try to hurt Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The Justice Department's inquiry should be allowed to proceed without any further interference."
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics...ils-on-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret

And the over top secret information was in an email sent to Clinton about a New York Times article about drones………..REALLY NOW!
But you’ll never see that reported in Faux Noise and all the other RW slander sheets………… AND THEM THE FACTS FRIEND……………DEAL WITH IT


BTW

I just loved the "Shrillary" reference............ Was that a flight of inspiration?.................Or just a typo?
 
Yeah, nobody else is in that little world of yours.

Clinton is not being investigated for people sending her emails. The people in the little world are the ones who are waiting for charges to be filed against her and then will mindlessly claim she didn't get charged because of (put false conservative narrative here). The story from the state dept is they were not classified when they were sent to her. I have no reason to assume that has changed. The fox link doesn't say that has changed. It clearly wants you to infer they were classified but they don't come out and say it. Fox is not subtle. Just look at the vile and disgusting stand down lies. That started with Fox.

Fyi, see how you're posting about me and I'm posting about the thread topic. don't feel bad, most cons do it.
 
For those interested in the HRC email thingy………WikiLeaks has posted a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State…………

Now her detractors can read “to their hearts content” all of her “criminal” activity and have a web citation to show/prove just where she broke the law and therefore deserves to be put in jail….

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/
 
For those interested in the HRC email thingy………WikiLeaks has posted a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State…………

Now her detractors can read “to their hearts content” all of her “criminal” activity and have a web citation to show/prove just where she broke the law and therefore deserves to be put in jail….

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

:roll:

How on earth could Wiki leaks possibly post all of her Emails ?

Thousands were deleted. And wiki leaks got a hold of the 22 Emails that Obama refused to release ?

Remember the ones that were so classified he couldnt make them public ? Those are in that Wiki leaks post ?

Just in case you forgot about Obama's WH refusing to release 22 of her Emails here's a reminder

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/3...oo-classified-to-be-made-public.html?referer=
 
For those interested in the HRC email thingy………WikiLeaks has posted a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State…………

Now her detractors can read “to their hearts content” all of her “criminal” activity and have a web citation to show/prove just where she broke the law and therefore deserves to be put in jail….

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

You can get these emails in several places. I can think of two right off the top of my head. One would be the State Department web site and the other is Judicial Watch. Then there is Vice and I think McClatchy DC has them on their site. You are lagging behind here. In advance, no, I won't link them here. I used google to find them months ago. What I want to read are the ones that the FBI is pulling off the server that were deleted. I am afraid we will have to wait for those. There is also another batch due out later this year. The State Department found some they "forgot" about and still need to process.
 
Hey, whaddaya know? Y'all mighta finally got her...but of course we still have to see how it all pans out, and get all sides of the story (which, of course, has never been high on the DP conservatives' list of priorities).

That said, that's not really a problem - because if she goes away, Bernie still beats any GOP candidate out there.

We have her side of the story, she wiped the server with a cloth. She's a lying piece of ****.
 
:roll:

How on earth could Wiki leaks possibly post all of her Emails ?

Thousands were deleted. And wiki leaks got a hold of the 22 Emails that Obama refused to release ?

Remember the ones that were so classified he couldnt make them public ? Those are in that Wiki leaks post ?

Just in case you forgot about Obama's WH refusing to release 22 of her Emails here's a reminder

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/3...oo-classified-to-be-made-public.html?referer=

I am not too into that email thing so many people are upset about..............It's a waste of time IMHO waste time with something will never go anywhere............just like Ben-gone-zi....

All I posted was a link to a searchable web site of all her emails released under court order...............expect for 22 deem as "Top Secret"...........

Just was trying to be helpful............
 
You can get these emails in several places. I can think of two right off the top of my head. One would be the State Department web site and the other is Judicial Watch. Then there is Vice and I think McClatchy DC has them on their site. You are lagging behind here. In advance, no, I won't link them here. I used google to find them months ago. What I want to read are the ones that the FBI is pulling off the server that were deleted. I am afraid we will have to wait for those. There is also another batch due out later this year. The State Department found some they "forgot" about and still need to process.

Yes you are correct...........But I believe the Wiki one is different because it is searchable............could be wrong............just trying to be helpful for the folks who are into that kinda waste of good time
 
I am not too into that email thing so many people are upset about..............It's a waste of time IMHO waste time with something will never go anywhere............just like Ben-gone-zi....

All I posted was a link to a searchable web site of all her emails released under court order...............expect for 22 deem as "Top Secret"...........

Just was trying to be helpful............

Lol !! Oh so now " you're not into the whole Email thing ". Suuuure you're not.

And you weren't helpful at all. How is it helpful to spread misinformation and debunked talking points ?

That would be helpful only to Hilary supporters and that's if people were stupid enough to believe that Wiki actually had access to ALL of her Emails

Whats next ? You going to tell is she set up the server so she would only have to use one device ?

Or are you not into the whole server issue ?
 
Lol !! Oh so now " you're not into the whole Email thing ". Suuuure you're not.

And you weren't helpful at all. How is it helpful to spread misinformation and debunked talking points ?

That would be helpful only to Hilary supporters and that's if people were stupid enough to believe that Wiki actually had access to ALL of her Emails

Whats next ? You going to tell is she set up the server so she would only have to use one device ?

Or are you not into the whole server issue ?


Sorry you found the post of web site disappointing .........

But truly............I could care less about her dam emails...............just a bunch of twaddle IMHO
 
Sorry you found the post of web site disappointing .........

But truly............I could care less about her dam emails...............just a bunch of twaddle IMHO

Tell us then exactly what you do care about and why anyone would support Hillary for the highest office in the land if she cannot be trusted with a lower level position?
 
Tell us then exactly what you do care about and why anyone would support Hillary for the highest office in the land if she cannot be trusted with a lower level position?


What I care for?

Not too much of what so many folks seem to get their "bowls in a up roar"........


And as far as HRC is concerned.......... once again, I could care less.......

Sorry..........
 
Back
Top Bottom