• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Notice a difference?

:lol: 3 YEARS LATER after she has been roasted over the coals time and time again for lying and deflecting. :lol:

Seriously, if that is the best you have for her it actually makes her look EVEN WORSE as it is just pandering because she wants to be President.

She is pure scum and this just further illustrates my point about partisan hacks that go to length to defend their ideological messiahs.

The link I posted, in which Hillary took responsibility for Benghazi, was from Oct. 2012.

You're just wrong. End of story. All your whining about "messiahs" and all that crap won't change that your entire premise is based on at best a factual error, and at worst a lie.
 
The link I posted, in which Hillary took responsibility for Benghazi, was from Oct. 2012.

You're just wrong. End of story. All your whining about "messiahs" and all that crap won't change that your entire premise is based on at best a factual error, and at worst a lie.

She does not take responsiblity on that link... They quote that one line and all it says is "I take responsibility" and it is the author of that article that infers it is about the actual attack failure from a second article in which she also does not actually take responsibility for the attack failure instead she takes responsilbity for the State Department and then mentions the security personal who are responsible for tactics, or soemthing like that.
 
Back
Top Bottom