- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 10,350
- Reaction score
- 4,989
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I'm curious what Carson-Care is would look like.
I mean, he has called "Obamacare worse than slavery"
Wiki.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson#Healthcare
Let's see.
He's got Health Savings account, but No 'For-Profit insurance companies.'
He calls for a system "similar to Medicare and Medicaid."
"National Guidelines" for end of life care.. aka.. "Death Panels"
And bafflingly..
"recognize that any government proposals affecting the health of all citizens should be free market-based and should be so appealing that it would not be necessary to force citizens into the program.."
What does that mean?
"so appealing" means "Cheap for alot of care"..
that's just Not possible in the private/"Free market" realm. There isn't and won't be a Geico/Progressive battle among Medical Ins cos/Doctors.
The only 'irresistible' medical care IS Medicare/Medicaid.
IOW, After all the beating around the Bush, Carson-Care doesn't sound much different than Obamacare, except Carson-Care would be more GOVERNMENT run.
I mean, he has called "Obamacare worse than slavery"
Wiki.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson#Healthcare
[......]
During the National Prayer Breakfast, Carson said about the ACA: "Here's my solution. When a person is born, give him a birth certificate, an electronic medical record and a health savings account [HSA]".[75]
Criticism of health insurance companies
In a 2009 interview, Carson said that he found the "concept of For-profits for the insurance companies" absurd.
He continued, "The first thing we need to do is get rid of for-profit insurance companies.
We have a lack of policies and we Need to make the Government responsible for catastrophic health care.
We have to make the insurance companies responsible only for routine health care."[76][77]
In 2014, Carson wrote in support of expanded use of health savings accounts, plus a system "Similar to Medicare and Medicaid" to address "complex pre-existing or acquired maladies".[78]
More generally, his position is that, "we need to remove health care from the political arena and recognize that any government proposals affecting the health of all citizens should be free market-based and should be so appealing that it would not be necessary to force citizens into the program."[79]
End-of-life care
In 1992, Carson wrote that aging and technological advancement will eventually lead to many people surviving their 100th birthdays.[80] He questioned the merits of prolonging life, citing the fact that "up to half of the medical expenses incurred in the average American's life are incurred during the last six months of life". He discussed the "dignity of dying in comfort, at home, with an attendant if necessary". Carson also stated: "Decisions on who should be treated and who should not be treated would clearly require some National guidelines....If a patient insisted on having everything done, consideration of more aggressive treatment should be given."[80][77][81] In January 2015, Carson stated that his views have evolved since 1992.[82][83]
Let's see.
He's got Health Savings account, but No 'For-Profit insurance companies.'
He calls for a system "similar to Medicare and Medicaid."
"National Guidelines" for end of life care.. aka.. "Death Panels"
And bafflingly..
"recognize that any government proposals affecting the health of all citizens should be free market-based and should be so appealing that it would not be necessary to force citizens into the program.."
What does that mean?
"so appealing" means "Cheap for alot of care"..
that's just Not possible in the private/"Free market" realm. There isn't and won't be a Geico/Progressive battle among Medical Ins cos/Doctors.
The only 'irresistible' medical care IS Medicare/Medicaid.
IOW, After all the beating around the Bush, Carson-Care doesn't sound much different than Obamacare, except Carson-Care would be more GOVERNMENT run.
Last edited: