dpcal
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2015
- Messages
- 389
- Reaction score
- 85
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
The article answers your question
If I missed statements by Trump in that article, please point them out.
The article answers your question
Dance puppet, dance.
Moderator's Warning: |
Knock it off, Vance, knock it off. |
don't forget his message about them Mexican rapists and drug dealers. Odd you left that out because it too helped his popularity.
If I missed statements by Trump in that article, please point them out.
The idea that America is going to endure the blood and moral outrage over the deportation of 11 million people, including young children of illegals born here who are constitutionally American citizens, is absurd. Even one of the most prominent immigration hawks, Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, dismissed this mass deportation as impossible on my radio show this week. But Donald Trump has proposed this, and loudly insisted he will do it. And the faction of the country that believes not in freedom but identity politics for white people adores it.
I doubt that. I don't think what Trump believes or says has anything to do with his popularity. It is his brash condemnation of the government establishment that appeals to republicans.
that's just it fmw, he shot up in the polls after insulting Mexicans. You can try to pass that off as a coincidence but don't forget, he shot up in the polls in 2012 when he questioned President Obama's BC. You don't have to agree that his "messages" have a racist tone but you have to acknowledge the possibility. And to me that perfectly explains why his insults of McCain and Kelly haven't really hurt him. That "angry white vote" is just so desperate for someone they think gets them. that's why the "pundits" predictions of his demise have yet to materialize.
Truthfully, I'm so tired of people blaming things on racism that I don't think of it and don't even accept it. If you understand Trump it seems to me he didn't insult Mexicans. He insulted the Mexican government for emptying some of their prison cells at the U.S. border. He could be wrong about that but it seems obvious that is what he was talking about. we've seen it before. You may recall the Mariel boat lift. He has even said he thinks the Mexican political leadership is smarter than ours.
People tend to color their analyses of things they read and hear to fit their own position. Trump doesn't seem like a racist to me. But he is not a politician either so he speaks from his experience and beliefs rather than to what people want to hear. That is refreshing to some and not to others. Personally none of it really matters to me. I just want to maintain gridlock. I want as little federal government as I can get. Slowing its growth is about all I can hope for.
that's just it fmw, he shot up in the polls after insulting Mexicans. You can try to pass that off as a coincidence but don't forget, he shot up in the polls in 2012 when he questioned President Obama's BC. You don't have to agree that his "messages" have a racist tone but you have to acknowledge the possibility. And to me that perfectly explains why his insults of McCain and Kelly haven't really hurt him. That "angry white vote" is just so desperate for someone they think gets them. that's why the "pundits" predictions of his demise have yet to materialize.
Trump shot up in the polls as he made it clear that illegal immigration has to stop and that those that are here illegally should be sent back to their own countries. It amazes me that he isn't supported by every low paid worker in this country, as if that occurred (which is highly unlikely at least in terms of sending all that are home), their wages would rise. In California, where 13.2% of K-12 students are children of illegal immigrants (although couldn't tell if some of these were "anchors"), 23% of K-12 students are English second language, I don't know why more parents with K-12 students where funding is short aren't flocking to Trump. But to suggest that's its because of some "racism" suggests a lack of a real argument.
Personally, not sure what to make of the guy yet. If he's serious about his illegal immigration position, and over the course of the election season he seems like he could function independently (as he's not going to be popular with Republican legislators) he might have my vote.
that sounds good except he didn't he drop off after insulting Megan Kelly and McCain. Any normal voter would rethink their position after those classless (and clueless) remarks But the "angry white voter" doesn't care about Kelly or McCain. If there is one group desperate to be pandered to, that's the group. that's why his polls hit 24 % and locked in at the number.
If you're unable to even consider the possibility that calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers is racist then you need to ask why you are at a debate forum. And don't forget, the last time he shot up in the polls he was questioning President Obama's BC. That narrative was racist in nature.
Look if the race card does it for you, its not my problem. There are 50+ million Hispanics in this country... Hispanics are your friends, relatives, colleagues unless maybe you live in some white separatist enclave. Its about the illegals... a strong majority want the illegal immigration to stop and at least send back the recent arrivals. That's what Trump has tapped into as its a given the democrats won't do it and its also clear the republicans are only going to move their lips about it.
Most Voters Want to Send Latest Illegal Immigrants Home ASAP - Rasmussen Reportsâ„¢
that sounds good except he didn't he drop off after insulting Megan Kelly and McCain. Any normal voter would rethink their position after those classless (and clueless) remarks But the "angry white voter" doesn't care about Kelly or McCain. If there is one group desperate to be pandered to, that's the group. that's why his polls hit 24 % and locked in at the number.
If you're unable to even consider the possibility that calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers is racist then you need to ask why you are at a debate forum. And don't forget, the last time he shot up in the polls he was questioning President Obama's BC. That narrative was racist in nature.
Mmmm, the problem I have with "its a given the democrats won't do it and its also clear the republicans are only going to move their lips about it" is you seem to acknowledge that republicans are only pandering to you about it. That's actually progress. Now do you have any idea why republicans only pander to you about illegal immigration? Of course they want your vote but why do they only pander?
I no longer care about the image the party is projecting.
I do not care about image, I care about results!!!
Image is PC. Screw image. We need results, without people voluntary bogging themselves down in fraidy-cat-land 'cause of all the idiotic PC drivel like the fearmongering link in the OP.
Because the republicans are like the democrats. They study the demographics, calculate how to swing the votes they need in key places so they can maximize the political powers... that's what determines what both parties do. All you have to do is look at all democrats lined up on one side of an issue and all republicans lined up on the other to understand it has nothing to do with conscience or commitment. I think its also a given that the republicans take for granted that those who oppose illegal immigration will end up voting for them anyway as it least they make sounds like they think about it. The best part about Trump is going to be watching the absolute chaos in the republican leadership and the other candidates... I can only hope for a Trump like to show up on the democratic side, but won't hold my breath on that one.
However in the debate, she was clearly running her personal agenda on Trump.
You and others may not "think Trump's popularity has anything to do with racism", but at least one guy writing on The Federalist web site thinks it does:
So, yeah. There are some on the right agreeing with the libs that Trump's popularity is based on racism. Comparing Trump and the Black Lives Matter movement is stretching similarities just a wee bit, one is a presidential candidate and the other is a disjointed movement, but still in both cases one can see stands centered on race. For Trump, it is the European-American and for BLM it is the African-American; in both instances they are groups which feel as if they are being ignored by the Establishment.
Are Republicans For Freedom or White Identity Politics?
Even the Federalist is concerned about the image the republican party is giving
I think they are just sick of main stream politics. I don't think it has anything to do with appropriateness for the job. It is just anger.
Camer☑n;1064951046 said:I for one, have always considered Republicans to play white southern identity politics. Not that Democrats are any better - they are not. Both sides pander like crazy to their respective coalitions, which unfortunately in this country are pretty cleanly divided according to specific racial, age, income and demographic criteria.
Yes, but anger at what?
IMO, it's anger that they're not getting their way which is indicative of a huge resentment of democracy
I agree with the anger for not getting their way. But I think calling it a resentment of democracy is a stretch. It is a resentment of what democracy has wrought.
IMO, that's a difference of no significance.
It is the difference between process and result.