- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 32,486
- Reaction score
- 22,732
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
you keep bringing up kansas city,but not kansas as a whole.everyone i have met from the state claims it is mostly farmland and empty prairies.i wuld definately not call it a well funded state.
further median household income o kansas city is kansas and missouri vs texas is subject to cost of living to determine quality of life,as it is with any comparison anywhere in the country.
I bring up KC because the KC metro is the only major city in the state. The bulk of Kansans live near KC or Wichita. The cost of living in KC is actually a little lower than Houston and the overall quality of life is a lot better than Houston - unless you hate the cold (my wife is from Houston). Here we have a beautiful city, museums (one of the best art museums in the world), shopping, tons of local restaurants, pro-sports, not near the traffic, a very diverse economy with a thriving tech sector, and easy access down to the Ozarks with its national forests, mountains and clear lakes. My wife has at most a 5 minute commute to work, I have at most a 10 minute commute.
Moreover, the whole state isn't all farmland and empty prairies. Sure central and western Kansas is (just like much of Texas is for that matter), but eastern Kansas is a lot of green rolling hills and woodlands.
I know Texans have this notion that the good life is only in Texas but its actually in a lot of places. For example, if you want to see a city that truly has its **** together and a overall quality of life that beats just about anywhere else, look no further than the Twin Cities, and they don't have a drop of oil up there. We had a good thing going here on the Kansas side until Brownback gutted the state's revenue and blew up the budget.