• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Only in America...

jimbo said:
Number 4. Only in America could citizens need to attend classes, undergo background checks, provide proof of citizenship, pay hefty fees, to exercise 1 right, and have other citizens insist that people should need no proof, classes, or fees to exercse another.
Click to expand...

Now that's a good one. I am pro-Second Amendment.
 
Sabanist said:
It only appears that i failed to someone who blindfolds themselves with liberal rhetoric and delusion.
Click to expand...

Cares to highlight the part that gives evidence of what is being said in the original post?
 
Hari Seldon said:
No its pretty much the usual conservative crap not backed up by much if any facts.
Click to expand...

You have trouble reading i suppose. I searched for two seconds and confirmed the first two claims. Take your blinders off and see.
 
Again, 30 seconds of reading

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner

During his confirmation, it was disclosed that Geithner had not paid $35,000 in Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes from 2001 through 2004 while working for the International Monetary Fund.

Libs are like (where??!!, prove it??!!!, while it stares them in the face
 
Luftwaffe said:
Obama is half white why the hell do people call him black.

Have you guys NOT seen his mother by any chance?
Click to expand...

Ask the dude himself...

The president, who was born in Hawaii and raised there and in Indonesia, had more than a dozen options in responding to Question 9, about race. He chose “Black, African Am., or Negro.” (The anachronistic “Negro” was retained on the 2010 form because the Census Bureau believes that some older blacks still refer to themselves that way.)

Mr. Obama could have checked white, checked both black and white, or checked the last category on the form, “some other race,” which he would then have been asked to identify in writing.
Click to expand...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/us/politics/03census.html?_r=2&
 
8. Takes some math and research, so i get that libs cant figure it out.

20 pct of the fed workforce black: Ehh, not just federal. But state and local too. http://www.dol.gov/_sec/media/reports/blacklaborforce/

I think i need not post that potus and ag are black.

31 pct of tanf recipients are black
31 pct are white. Blacks represent 14 pct of the population, 68 pct white.

2.4 million adults living in tanf house holds.

.31 x 2.4 million= 744k

235 million adults in us.

32.9 million blacks
159.8 million white

744k/32.9m= 2.3 pct
744k/ 159.8m= .5 pct

2.3 pct /.5 pct = 4.6

Blacks are on tanf 5 times the rate of whites

I can do the math for the other entitlements but im pretty sure they will all be consistent
 
Sabanist said:
You have trouble reading i suppose. I searched for two seconds and confirmed the first two claims. Take your blinders off and see.
Click to expand...

Care to show me where they talked about greed at the fundraiser? I agree he had a fundraiser for $35,000. All politicians raise money. Show me what was said since that seems to be the conmen objection.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Care to show me where they talked about greed at the fundraiser? I agree he had a fundraiser for $35,000. All politicians raise money. Show me what was said since that seems to be the conmen objection.
Click to expand...

While i dont have the content of that particular liberal circle jerk do you concede that greed and income equality are common sources of rhetoric? If you dont then i cant help you, you are truly blind and deaf
 
You know what, screw this. Im tired of proving the libs stupid with all these links. How bout libs try to prove they are not happening.
 
Btw, here is yet another 35k pp fundraiser for obama, surely they discuss greed at a few of them

Teehee!!!
 
Sabanist said:
While i dont have the content of that particular liberal circle jerk do you concede that greed and income equality are common sources of rhetoric? If you dont then i cant help you, you are truly blind and deaf
Click to expand...

Exactly. You have a bunch of bull designed to inflame the right wing base into apoplexy. Seems to have worked. Now that we have show #1 is complete nonsense (I guess only repugs get to fund raise) lets go on to #2. Any possibility you can show me where a claim is made that the GOVERNMENT is racist? The link you posted about the Democratic Underground led me to their forum which had a post about Muslims and about how they think every 9/11 people give them dirty looks and think they are responsible even if they are law abiding US citizens.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Exactly. You have a bunch of bull designed to inflame the right wing base into apoplexy. Seems to have worked. Now that we have show #1 is complete nonsense (I guess only repugs get to fund raise) lets go on to #2. Any possibility you can show me where a claim is made that the GOVERNMENT is racist? The link you posted about the Democratic Underground led me to their forum which had a post about Muslims and about how they think every 9/11 people give them dirty looks and think they are responsible even if they are law abiding US citizens.
Click to expand...

Stop. Just stop. 1 is not nonsense. Only in your mind. You can play dumb if you like, but you know its true.
 
Sabanist said:
Stop. Just stop. 1 is not nonsense. Only in your mind. You can play dumb if you like, but you know its true.
Click to expand...

Sure it is. Obama has his rich supporters, many of whom are in the financial industry. If I was paying $35,000 a plate to talk to him at a fundraiser I would probably talk to him about how he could streamline or remove regulation or steer government funds my way for whatever industry I represented. However since you have no idea what was said at the dinner it sure is complete garbage. Try and come up with your own opinions with just a little bit of support rather than post some BS you received in an email.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Sure it is. Obama has his rich supporters, many of whom are in the financial industry. If I was paying $35,000 a plate to talk to him at a fundraiser I would probably talk to him about how he could streamline or remove regulation or steer government funds my way for whatever industry I represented. However since you have no idea what was said at the dinner it sure is complete garbage. Try and come up with your own opinions with just a little bit of support rather than post some BS you received in an email.
Click to expand...

Fine, dont ever comment on things you arent there to witness, umkay?
 
Sabanist said:
Fine, dont ever comment on things you arent there to witness, umkay?
Click to expand...

Man are you dense. Comment all you like just try not to make stuff up. If the email had simply derided Obama for $35,000 a plate dinner you would have had something. Except it wouldn't have been as sexy or infuriating as adding that they talked about greed during the dinner. The email is Hollywood, a little bit of truth with a lot of embellishment and artistic improvisation.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Man are you dense. Comment all you like just try not to make stuff up. If the email had simply derided Obama for $35,000 a plate dinner you would have had something. Except it wouldn't have been as sexy or infuriating as adding that they talked about greed during the dinner. The email is Hollywood, a little bit of truth with a lot of embellishment and artistic improvisation.
Click to expand...

Are you really going to argue that obama has never discussed income equality or greed at one of these pricey crcle jerks? Really? Even though he has discussed it in public? You dont think he really bangs on it in a private setting? You cant be that dumb
 
Sabanist said:
Are you really going to argue that obama has never discussed income equality or greed at one of these pricey crcle jerks? Really? Even though he has discussed it in public? You dont think he really bangs on it in a private setting? You cant be that dumb
Click to expand...

So what #10 really should have said was:

Number 10 Only in America could politicians probably talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 per plate Obama campaign fund-raising event.

Doesn't have the same bite now does it. How about that GOVERNMENT racism?
 
Sabanist said:
Again, 30 seconds of reading

Timothy Geithner - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

During his confirmation, it was disclosed that Geithner had not paid $35,000 in Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes from 2001 through 2004 while working for the International Monetary Fund.

Libs are like (where??!!, prove it??!!!, while it stares them in the face
Click to expand...


Sabanist said:
Oh look what i found, i sure looked hard for it

Charles B. Rangel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...

If this is directed at me which of the list does these prove?
 
Sabanist said:
While i dont have the content of that particular liberal circle jerk do you concede that greed and income equality are common sources of rhetoric? If you dont then i cant help you, you are truly blind and deaf
Click to expand...

YES, I will agree with this.
 
Sabanist said:
You know what, screw this. Im tired of proving the libs stupid with all these links. How bout libs try to prove they are not happening.
Click to expand...

That's not the way it works. You cant prove a negative. The person making the accusation needs to provide the proof.
 
Sabanist said:
Stop. Just stop. 1 is not nonsense. Only in your mind. You can play dumb if you like, but you know its true.
Click to expand...

Even if they did, raising money at a fundraiser to fund a person to help the poor is not a bad thing to do.
 
Amandi said:
That's not the way it works. You cant prove a negative. The person making the accusation needs to provide the proof.
Click to expand...

But its a lot easier to post the contents of an email that was forwarded to you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom