• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tea Party PACs Reap Large Amounts Of Money, Barely Spend Any On Candidates

TeleKat

Banned
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
5,849
Reaction score
3,775
Location
Ask the NSA
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
When the Tea Party Patriots threw its support last month behind Matt Bevin, the underdog conservative challenger trying to unseat top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell, President Jenny Beth Martin vowed the group would be “putting our money where our mouth is.” So far, its super PAC has mustered just $56,000 worth of mailers in Kentucky on Bevin’s behalf — less than half the amount it has paid Martin in consulting fees since July. The Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, which blew through nearly $2 million on expenses such as fundraising, polling and consultants in the first three months of this year, is not alone in its meager spending on candidates. A Washington Post analysis found that some of the top national tea party groups engaged in this year’s midterm elections have put just a tiny fraction of their money directly into boosting the candidates they’ve endorsed. The practice is not unusual in the freewheeling world of big-money political groups, but it runs counter to the ethos of the tea party movement, which sprouted five years ago amid anger on the right over wasteful government spending. And it contrasts with the urgent appeals tea party groups have made to their base of small donors, many of whom repeatedly contribute after being promised that their money will help elect conservative politicians.

Out of the $37.5 million spent so far by the PACs of six major tea party organizations, less than $7 million has been devoted to directly helping candidates, according to the analysis, which was based on campaign finance data provided by the Sunlight Foundation. The dearth of election spending has left many favored tea party candidates exposed before a series of pivotal GOP primaries next month in North Carolina, Nebraska, Idaho and Kentucky. Roughly half of the money — nearly $18 million — has gone to pay for fundraising and direct mail, largely provided by Washington-area firms. Meanwhile, tea party leaders and their family members have been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in consulting fees, while their groups have doled out large sums for airfare, a retirement plan and even interior decorating. The lavish spending underscores how the protest movement has gone professional, with national groups transforming themselves into multimillion-dollar organizations run by activists collecting six-figure salaries.

Tea Party PACs reap money for midterms, but spend little on candidates - The Washington Post

Not surprising. Thoughts on this?
 
Funding for individual campaigns should only be considered when there is a tight race and a real chance. The rest of the money should go to general national PR efforts.

:shrug:
 
PACs are basically legalized grifting.
 
So we're complaining that they are being successful by embracing establishment political fundraising efforts?
 
So we're complaining that they are being successful by embracing establishment political fundraising efforts?

mmmm, you seemed to have missed the point. The article is not complaining about their success collecting money. Its pointing out how they spend it. Lets compare them to other PACs.

“Three well-known groups — the Tea Party Patriots, the Tea Party Express and the Madison Project — have spent 5 percent or less of their money directly on election-related activity during this election cycle. Two other prominent tea party groups, the Senate Conservatives Fund and FreedomWorks, have devoted about 40 percent of their money to direct candidate support such as ads and yard signs.”

Wow, they really suck compared to other conservative groups. mmmmm, how do they compare to the overall PAC spending

“On average, super PACs had spent 64 percent of their funds on directly helping candidates by roughly this stage in the 2012 election cycle, according to Federal Election Commission data.”

Does that help put into perspective the point of the article? Speaking of Tea Party scams


Pro-Troop Charity Misleads Donors While Lining Political Consultants’ Pockets

Pro-Troop Charity Misleads Donors While Lining Political Consultants’ Pockets - ProPublica

“For instance, it earned zero stars out of a potential four from the rating organization Charity Navigator.“
 

to just start off,likely the pac is holding off til last second,as the last weeks of an election are most critical,though wasting money itself is no surprise,all political fundraisers and pacs do it.


second your quote says the tea party sprang up 5 years ago,it actually sprang up 7 years ago,in protest to govt spending and bailouts under bush.
 
Back
Top Bottom