• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why do the godless disproportunately influence USA government and education?

iangb said:
Well, until you do, I guess i will just be content that your position has a great big hole in it. Defend it if you can, but so far every sign is that you can't. Don't expect another response if your avoidance continues
Click to expand...

Evolution is FULL of holes.
Well,

We agree to disagree. Civilized people do that.
 
yobarnacle said:
The motives I explained are my motives.
Assigning so called "apparent" and dishonest motives to me, is projection on your part.
You realize you can't read minds, I hope.
News bulletin. Most people don't think like you.
That's why humans invented communication.
It's supposed to result in mutual understanding, but breaksdown if you mistrust their stated position or assume they are lying.
Because projecting your own personality and thoughts on other people, is as dysfunctional as assuming you read minds.
Communication is useless or impossible if you spin or reinterpret what other's say.
If it's useless, why should I bother to try to talk with you?
Click to expand...
I'm making an assumption/guess based on observed data (aka seeing you post).
I made no claims as to your honesty or lack thereof.

From viewing your posting style, it appears that the following takes place:
Someone engages you in discussion.
You disagree.
They present supporting evidence.
You call their evidence flawed and unacceptable.
They point out why their evidence is correct.
You call their evidence flawed and unacceptable.
They get upset with you.
You ignore them.

At no point do I recall seeing you actually address someone's evidence or point, beyond presenting a false/flawed counterpoint you insist is valid in the face of all opposing argument.
 
That is a true reflection of his M.O. "style" is rather an understatement in the circumstances.
 
Manc Skipper said:
That is a true reflection of his M.O. "style" is rather an understatement in the circumstances.
Click to expand...
The "Saints" is an American football team. Is also the correct name for Christians.
 

Attachments

  • Saint's FacePalm.jpg
    Saint's FacePalm.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 9
The Mark said:
Please explain.
Click to expand...

Nah! Anything I say, you'll try to spin.
So figure it out, post your "conclusion", and I'll spin YOUR words for a change.
Sauce for the goose....
You both expressed a liking for roughhouse debate, I'll play.
 
Last edited:
yobarnacle said:
Nah! Anything I say, you'll try to spin.
So figure it out, post your "conclusion", and I'll spin YOUR words for a change.
Sauce for the goose....
You both expressed a liking for roughhouse debate, I'll play.
Click to expand...
Spin?

Where?
 
The Mark said:
Spin?

Where?
Click to expand...

Coy does not work, not for ladyboys or real females either.
You have to act smarter, not "cuter".
Boring.
And I'm hetero and monogamous.
Grow a pair, why don't you.
 
yobarnacle said:
Coy does not work, not for ladyboys or real females either.
You have to act smarter, not "cuter".
Boring.
And I'm hetero and monogamous.
Grow a pair, why don't you.
Click to expand...
That was a serious question.
 
What the hell influence is OP babbling about? As far as i know, there isn't even a single admitted atheist in congress now. If 1 in 5 voters are atheist, there should be dozens in office, but that's just how paranoid the other 4 in 5 are and how deep their persecution complex runs.

The only reason this isn't a complete theocracy is the founders' collective wisdom to at least try to separate church and state.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom