• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ho hum, yet another Benghazi report shreds conservative lies

It is still amazing that the die hard Obama lovers still don't get it. The LIAR in CHIEF and his claim of blaming a video for the attacks is the biggest issue about Benghazi. Obama is nothing but a LIAR and an EPIC FAILURE.

Why on earth is that the "biggest issue"? As far as I'm concerned, it's the least consequential issue regarding the whole thing.

The breakdown in security is the biggest issue, and it should be for you too.
 
I support the President and the State Dept. not partisan witch hunts. There was no good reason for the $14 million they spent. The matter was already investigated and the findings have not changed. Do you support partisan boondoggles that waste taxpayer money?

I support oversight and investigations.... all of 'em....

something about government accountability just strikes my fancy.... I'm old fashioned that way.
I don't like the modern outlook of not wanting the government investigated.... to me, that is corrupt and unethical (and a hallmark of the Republocrat) mindset).

I also don't believe it cost 14 million dollars....no way in hell.
I'll bet a dollar to a donut it actually cost next to nothing in extra funds.
 
Imagine how incompetent your President and Hillary Clinton are VERN.

After terrorist had blown a 12 foot hole compound wall two weeks before, after every other Nation AND the Red Cross had bailed out, after repeated request for more security were ignored, your President, your head of the State Department didn't even think to have the needed assets offsite for a rescue just in case.

There wasn't even any contingency plans made just in case the Embassy came under attack.

Whatever kind of incompetent, idiotic administration does things like that ?

They left those people there to die

People like you should think twice about pulling that voting lever again VERN.

You were clearly never taught to take the right to vote seriously.

Now, its cost people their lives.

But, you don't want to talk about the other attacks and deaths at embassies under other president's tenure....

outrage.jpg
 
Why on earth is that the "biggest issue"? As far as I'm concerned, it's the least consequential issue regarding the whole thing.

The breakdown in security is the biggest issue, and it should be for you too.

I agree with this....

I expect El Presidente and his minions to spin and lie... the real issue, however, is how and why we had this security breakdown.
 
Imagine how incompetent your President and Hillary Clinton are VERN.

After terrorist had blown a 12 foot hole compound wall two weeks before, after every other Nation AND the Red Cross had bailed out, after repeated request for more security were ignored, your President, your head of the State Department didn't even think to have the needed assets offsite for a rescue just in case.

There wasn't even any contingency plans made just in case the Embassy came under attack.

Whatever kind of incompetent, idiotic administration does things like that ?

They left those people there to die

People like you should think twice about pulling that voting lever again VERN.

You were clearly never taught to take the right to vote seriously.

Now, its cost people their lives.

Nobody ever died under a Republican administration!
 
Yet they mounted the ONLY rescue mission in Benghazi? Why was that? The CIA is not HUD and had MOST of the personnel in Benghazi so of course they were responsible for the Security there. Robert's was not even in a US Embassy either.

They mounted a rescue mission because they were Americans trying to help other Americans on a purely ad hoc basis. They had no security responsibility whatsoever for either the Ambassador personally or for the State Dept. compound. Those are the exclusive purview of the State Dept.'s Bureau of Diplomatic Security.:peace
 
Why on earth is that the "biggest issue"? As far as I'm concerned, it's the least consequential issue regarding the whole thing.

The breakdown in security is the biggest issue, and it should be for you too.

Terrorist attacks have happened before and will happen many more times. But when a failed leader has to resort to blaming a video for an attack, that to me is a BIG issue. Never heard of any other President blaming a video on any attacks before.
 
Nobody ever died under a Republican administration!

How many Republicans BLAMED a video for three weeks? Need help with that? NONE.
 
Nobody. Cares. About. The. ****ing. Video.

Maybe you don't care. But what about the rest of America? I bet there are a lot of people who care about that falsehood. Maybe the families of the dead Americans? But then again Liberals have fallen for all Obama has told them. Pathetic.
 
Maybe you don't care. But what about the rest of America? I bet there are a lot of people who care about that falsehood. Maybe the families of the dead Americans? But then again Liberals have fallen for all Obama has told them. Pathetic.

Does the (often disputed) "fact" that the video had nothing to do with the attack make the people who died at Benghazi any less dead?

The video WAS responsible for numerous demonstrations throughout the Middle East at the same time.

It's funny how the same people who completely absolve Bush for the false intel that took us into war with Iraq pillory Obama for the false intel that the video may have had something to do with the attack.
 
Does the (often disputed) "fact" that the video had nothing to do with the attack make the people who died at Benghazi any less dead?

The video WAS responsible for numerous demonstrations throughout the Middle East at the same time.

It's funny how the same people who completely absolve Bush for the false intel that took us into war with Iraq pillory Obama for the false intel that the video may have had something to do with the attack.

Didn't take long for the Liberal Mantra of "Blame Bush" to come out when their Messiah is called out for being a LIAR. A little tip for you, BUSH IS NOT PRESIDENT NOW. History lesson over.
 
Didn't take long for the Liberal Mantra of "Blame Bush" to come out when their Messiah is called out for being a LIAR. A little tip for you, BUSH IS NOT PRESIDENT NOW. History lesson over.

I didn't blame Bush for anything, guy. Learn to read.

The problem isn't with Bush, it's with the people who happily forgave him for mis-steps that they are attempting to crucify Obama for. It's called hypocrisy, dear boy, and your side is soaking in it.

Christ, you can't even mention Bush's name on this forum -- in ANY context -- without some right-winger screeching about "BLAMING BUSH." It's like you guys are trying to completely scrub his very existence from memory.
 
I didn't blame Bush for anything, guy. Learn to read.

The problem isn't with Bush, it's with the people who happily forgave him for mis-steps that they are attempting to crucify Obama for. It's called hypocrisy, dear boy, and your side is soaking in it.

Christ, you can't even mention Bush's name on this forum -- in ANY context -- without some right-winger screeching about "BLAMING BUSH." It's like you guys are trying to completely scrub his very existence from memory.

Nice try at spinning. Saul Alinsky would be proud of you. Good Boy. Barry will be proud of you. Care to name which video Bush blamed for any attacks?
 
Nice try at spinning. Saul Alinsky would be proud of you. Good Boy. Barry will be proud of you.

Alinsky! Everybody drink!

Not a single refutation or challenge to anything I posted. Just more twaddle.

I really wish I understood the far right's obsession with Saul Alinsky and your desperate attempts to tie him to anyone you disagree with, especially since the far right follows the "Alinsky playbook" step by step.
 
Alinsky! Everybody drink!

Not a single refutation or challenge to anything I posted. Just more twaddle.

Oh, I see. YOUR opinion is the only one that matters. The CHALLENGE was "which video did any Republicans blame any attack on"? Your turn, or spin it.
 
Oh, I see. YOUR opinion is the only one that matters. The CHALLENGE was "which video did any Republicans blame any attack on"? Your turn, or spin it.

So because no Republican administration (there's been only one since YouTube was invented) claimed a YouTube video was the impetus for a terrorist attack, that means ... what, exactly?

A Republican president certainly claimed that Al Qaeda "hates us for our freedoms," which is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
 
So because no Republican administration (there's been only one since YouTube was invented) claimed a YouTube video was the impetus for a terrorist attack, that means ... what, exactly?

A Republican president certainly claimed that Al Qaeda "hates us for our freedoms," which is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

Who said anything about a YouTube video but you? There have been videos for many decades, why does it have to be YouTube? You are struggling very hard now, but once again, nice try with the spin.
 
Who said anything about a YouTube video but you? There have been videos for many decades, why does it have to be YouTube? You are struggling very hard now, but once again, nice try with the spin.

What on earth is your point? Just make it already and stop wasting everyone's time.
 
What on earth is your point? Just make it already and stop wasting everyone's time.

I love when you Liberals get angry when shot down. Still waiting for YOUR twaddle on "which Republican EVER blamed a video for any attacks"?
 
I love when you Liberals get angry when shot down. Still waiting for YOUR twaddle on "which Republican EVER blamed a video for any attacks"?

What on earth is your point? Just make it already and stop wasting everyone's time.
 
What on earth is your point? Just make it already and stop wasting everyone's time.

ROTFLMMFAO. I have NEVER seen anyone struggle as much as you are?
 
ROTFLMMFAO. I have NEVER seen anyone struggle as much as you are?

Has a Republican president claimed a video was the impetus for a terrorist attack? No, not that I can think of. Which proves ... nothing. Congratulations.

Now, I'll ask a THIRD time, since apparently the first two didn't sink in: WHAT IS YOUR ****ING POINT? I won't bother asking a fourth time.
 
Has a Republican president claimed a video was the impetus for a terrorist attack? No, not that I can think of. Which proves ... nothing. Congratulations.

Now, I'll ask a THIRD time, since apparently the first two didn't sink in: WHAT IS YOUR ****ING POINT? I won't bother asking a fourth time.

My point was made in Post #57. Get with the times, maybe you won't have to struggle so much next time.
 
My point was made in Post #57. Get with the times, maybe you won't have to struggle so much next time.

This is post 57:

Terrorist attacks have happened before and will happen many more times. But when a failed leader has to resort to blaming a video for an attack, that to me is a BIG issue. Never heard of any other President blaming a video on any attacks before.

Fine, to you, it's a big issue. To me, it's the most inconsequential part of the whole fiasco. Moving on.
 
Back
Top Bottom