• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as racist

ModerationNow!

You should hate the "news" media more
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
2,963
Reaction score
1,490
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
You may remember several years ago when you'd turn on CNN or any other MSM news outlet and you'd see guests as well as the journalists claiming that the term "alien" is offensive and insulting to illegal immigrants. They used that excuse to change the terminology, and from then they began referring to them as "illegal Immigrants". But it wasnt long before they began having other liberals guests on who would now make the claim that the term "illegal" was condescending, offensive, etc. From there, the new terminology that you'd see in the MSM was "undocumented immigrants".

But that wasnt good enough, because then they changed it again, and starting about 2-4 years ago, most MSM outlets and left wing sources dropped any reference that sneaking over the borders is 'illegal', and instead they began referring to them simply as "immigrants". Not much happens on the left that isnt planned and calculated. This was designed to advance the average independent American's support for illegal immigrants to receive some form of deferred amnesty, or better yet, instant amnesty through one of the so called "Dreamer bills". That term was obviously chosen to make illegal immigration seem more acceptable to the average American, and to vilify or intimidate any opposition so they would be more likely to stop opposing illegal immigration, effective border security, amnesty, etc. Its all about packaging and marketing!


But now they have found a new way to spin their own ever-changing terminology for illegal immigration. They are now referring to those who oppose illegal immigration or amnesty as "anti-immigrant" To call someone anti-immigrant is to falsely create the perception that these people are simply against immigration of any kind. That is to say that anyone who is anti-immigrant doesnt want ANY immigration even if its done in an orderly, legal manner. Of course that makes the left's opposition look radical and nationalistic, but mostly it makes them look racist! So we are back to the common liberal strategy of destroying the credibility of your opposition by deceptively turning entire races of people against them! Its also a form of fear mongering, because they can(and will) convince Latinos to vote for dems because the wonderful democrats will protect them from the racist conservatives and republicans!

So, why exactly have those in the democratic party and those with power and influence from the left been so staunchly in favor of amnesty, less border security, instant driver's licenses, social services entitlements for illegals, sanctuary cities, etc? Its very simple. Among the legal, American Latino community, the democrats enjoy roughly a 70% voter advantage. But as soon as the unknown millions of illegals are granted voting rights, they know that the vast majority will vote democrat! The dems have "given" them the most free(taxpayer funded) stuff. The dems have ignored federal immigration law and refused in many places to deport any illegal, even convicted felons( many sanctuary cities). They even try to grant voting rights to illegals in some areas, so that they can take advantage of that monolithic voting block immediately! You know the term "follow the money"? Here its "follow the votes".


It amazes me that at least some people who support democrats(like me 12 years ago) dont see through this and demand a stop to the racial politicking the democratic party lowers itself to. This stuff is bad for everyone in this country!
 
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

You may remember several years ago when you'd turn on CNN or any other MSM news outlet and you'd see guests as well as the journalists claiming that the term "alien" is offensive and insulting to illegal immigrants. They used that excuse to change the terminology, and from then they began referring to them as "illegal Immigrants". But it wasnt long before they began having other liberals guests on who would now make the claim that the term "illegal" was condescending, offensive, etc. From there, the new terminology that you'd see in the MSM was "undocumented immigrants".

But that wasnt good enough, because then they changed it again, and starting about 2-4 years ago, most MSM outlets and left wing sources dropped any reference that sneaking over the borders is 'illegal', and instead they began referring to them simply as "immigrants". Not much happens on the left that isnt planned and calculated. This was designed to advance the average independent American's support for illegal immigrants to receive some form of deferred amnesty, or better yet, instant amnesty through one of the so called "Dreamer bills". That term was obviously chosen to make illegal immigration seem more acceptable to the average American, and to vilify or intimidate any opposition so they would be more likely to stop opposing illegal immigration, effective border security, amnesty, etc. Its all about packaging and marketing!


But now they have found a new way to spin their own ever-changing terminology for illegal immigration. They are now referring to those who oppose illegal immigration or amnesty as "anti-immigrant" To call someone anti-immigrant is to falsely create the perception that these people are simply against immigration of any kind. That is to say that anyone who is anti-immigrant doesnt want ANY immigration even if its done in an orderly, legal manner. Of course that makes the left's opposition look radical and nationalistic, but mostly it makes them look racist! So we are back to the common liberal strategy of destroying the credibility of your opposition by deceptively turning entire races of people against them! Its also a form of fear mongering, because they can(and will) convince Latinos to vote for dems because the wonderful democrats will protect them from the racist conservatives and republicans!

So, why exactly have those in the democratic party and those with power and influence from the left been so staunchly in favor of amnesty, less border security, instant driver's licenses, social services entitlements for illegals, sanctuary cities, etc? Its very simple. Among the legal, American Latino community, the democrats enjoy roughly a 70% voter advantage. But as soon as the unknown millions of illegals are granted voting rights, they know that the vast majority will vote democrat! The dems have "given" them the most free(taxpayer funded) stuff. The dems have ignored federal immigration law and refused in many places to deport any illegal, even convicted felons( many sanctuary cities). They even try to grant voting rights to illegals in some areas, so that they can take advantage of that monolithic voting block immediately! You know the term "follow the money"? Here its "follow the votes".


It amazes me that at least some people who support democrats(like me 12 years ago) dont see through this and demand a stop to the racial politicking the democratic party lowers itself to. This stuff is bad for everyone in this country!

By the same logic a drug dealer is an "undocumented pharmacist".

Just look at the Hobby Lobby decision. Initially the suit was brought because the Obamacare mandate was a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court found in their favor, and now the low information voters on this site and others are calling it "discrimination against women".

The same people who are for marijuana legalization are against tobacco smokers, and are trying to get vaping regulated because "nobody knows what it does". We know what marijuana does, but that doesn't stop them. It makes you wonder when this dishonesty and hypocrisy will stop. Dinesh D'Souza says it will stop when we stop it. Speak the truth to lies. Speak the truth to power. Speak it all the time. Speak it every time. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, drag it all out into the light.
 
Last edited:
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

You may remember several years ago when you'd turn on CNN or any other MSM news outlet and you'd see guests as well as the journalists claiming that the term "alien" is offensive and insulting to illegal immigrants. They used that excuse to change the terminology, and from then they began referring to them as "illegal Immigrants". But it wasnt long before they began having other liberals guests on who would now make the claim that the term "illegal" was condescending, offensive, etc. From there, the new terminology that you'd see in the MSM was "undocumented immigrants".

But that wasnt good enough, because then they changed it again, and starting about 2-4 years ago, most MSM outlets and left wing sources dropped any reference that sneaking over the borders is 'illegal', and instead they began referring to them simply as "immigrants". Not much happens on the left that isnt planned and calculated. This was designed to advance the average independent American's support for illegal immigrants to receive some form of deferred amnesty, or better yet, instant amnesty through one of the so called "Dreamer bills". That term was obviously chosen to make illegal immigration seem more acceptable to the average American, and to vilify or intimidate any opposition so they would be more likely to stop opposing illegal immigration, effective border security, amnesty, etc. Its all about packaging and marketing!


But now they have found a new way to spin their own ever-changing terminology for illegal immigration. They are now referring to those who oppose illegal immigration or amnesty as "anti-immigrant" To call someone anti-immigrant is to falsely create the perception that these people are simply against immigration of any kind. That is to say that anyone who is anti-immigrant doesnt want ANY immigration even if its done in an orderly, legal manner. Of course that makes the left's opposition look radical and nationalistic, but mostly it makes them look racist! So we are back to the common liberal strategy of destroying the credibility of your opposition by deceptively turning entire races of people against them! Its also a form of fear mongering, because they can(and will) convince Latinos to vote for dems because the wonderful democrats will protect them from the racist conservatives and republicans!

So, why exactly have those in the democratic party and those with power and influence from the left been so staunchly in favor of amnesty, less border security, instant driver's licenses, social services entitlements for illegals, sanctuary cities, etc? Its very simple. Among the legal, American Latino community, the democrats enjoy roughly a 70% voter advantage. But as soon as the unknown millions of illegals are granted voting rights, they know that the vast majority will vote democrat! The dems have "given" them the most free(taxpayer funded) stuff. The dems have ignored federal immigration law and refused in many places to deport any illegal, even convicted felons( many sanctuary cities). They even try to grant voting rights to illegals in some areas, so that they can take advantage of that monolithic voting block immediately! You know the term "follow the money"? Here its "follow the votes".


It amazes me that at least some people who support democrats(like me 12 years ago) dont see through this and demand a stop to the racial politicking the democratic party lowers itself to. This stuff is bad for everyone in this country!

It is basically an attempt at a bloodless coup by the democrat party. They do not believe in sharing entrenched power. Their continuous re-invention of terms to describe illegal aliens is not fooling the entire population, however unfortunately it is intimidating the republicans in congress. Before Eric Cantor lost his primary, the republicans with support of 144 house reps were prepared to let a comprehensive immigration bill with instant amnesty and only a false promise of border security come to a floor vote. They knew it would pass with mostly democrat votes and republicans would get to vote against it for appearance sake...while mollifying their big donors in the US Chamber of Commerce. After Cantor lost his primary, the republicans supporting amnesty freaked out. The number of republican reps supporting amnesty dropped to half...effectively killing the immigration bill for this year. That is how close the republicans came to committing political suicide.
 
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

Actually a drug dealer is just low life scum.
Hey now, you don't want to be racist (prejudice ) against drug dealers. They have feelings to you know, and they are just poor people trying to make a better life for themselves. Sure some of them might be gangsters, but they need our help.
 
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

Hey now, you don't want to be racist (prejudice ) against drug dealers. They have feelings to you know, and they are just poor people trying to make a better life for themselves. Sure some of them might be gangsters, but they need our help.

my weed dealer is a very old white dude( 70-something)...a former Marine, a retired physics professor at major university.. 2 PHd's... and soooo not poor.
his wife acts like some Indian shaman or something.. she likes her hallucinogens (acid and 'shrooms, peyote ,when she can find it)... she's a lil flighty.
 
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

You may remember several years ago when you'd turn on CNN or any other MSM news outlet and you'd see guests as well as the journalists claiming that the term "alien" is offensive and insulting to illegal immigrants. They used that excuse to change the terminology, and from then they began referring to them as "illegal Immigrants". But it wasnt long before they began having other liberals guests on who would now make the claim that the term "illegal" was condescending, offensive, etc. From there, the new terminology that you'd see in the MSM was "undocumented immigrants".

But that wasnt good enough, because then they changed it again, and starting about 2-4 years ago, most MSM outlets and left wing sources dropped any reference that sneaking over the borders is 'illegal', and instead they began referring to them simply as "immigrants". Not much happens on the left that isnt planned and calculated. This was designed to advance the average independent American's support for illegal immigrants to receive some form of deferred amnesty, or better yet, instant amnesty through one of the so called "Dreamer bills". That term was obviously chosen to make illegal immigration seem more acceptable to the average American, and to vilify or intimidate any opposition so they would be more likely to stop opposing illegal immigration, effective border security, amnesty, etc. Its all about packaging and marketing!


But now they have found a new way to spin their own ever-changing terminology for illegal immigration. They are now referring to those who oppose illegal immigration or amnesty as "anti-immigrant" To call someone anti-immigrant is to falsely create the perception that these people are simply against immigration of any kind. That is to say that anyone who is anti-immigrant doesnt want ANY immigration even if its done in an orderly, legal manner. Of course that makes the left's opposition look radical and nationalistic, but mostly it makes them look racist! So we are back to the common liberal strategy of destroying the credibility of your opposition by deceptively turning entire races of people against them! Its also a form of fear mongering, because they can(and will) convince Latinos to vote for dems because the wonderful democrats will protect them from the racist conservatives and republicans!

So, why exactly have those in the democratic party and those with power and influence from the left been so staunchly in favor of amnesty, less border security, instant driver's licenses, social services entitlements for illegals, sanctuary cities, etc? Its very simple. Among the legal, American Latino community, the democrats enjoy roughly a 70% voter advantage. But as soon as the unknown millions of illegals are granted voting rights, they know that the vast majority will vote democrat! The dems have "given" them the most free(taxpayer funded) stuff. The dems have ignored federal immigration law and refused in many places to deport any illegal, even convicted felons( many sanctuary cities). They even try to grant voting rights to illegals in some areas, so that they can take advantage of that monolithic voting block immediately! You know the term "follow the money"? Here its "follow the votes".


It amazes me that at least some people who support democrats(like me 12 years ago) dont see through this and demand a stop to the racial politicking the democratic party lowers itself to. This stuff is bad for everyone in this country!


This is just the latest examples of our "liberal" authoritarian speech police picking and choosing what language is acceptable or hateful based on how it benefits them.

They still pretend that there's no difference between immigration and illegal immigration. Recently they are trying to use the term migrant-but these undocumented democrats are here to stay.

George Orwell nailed it.
 
Re: Deceptive 'terminology' used to portray those against illegal immigration as raci

my weed dealer is a very old white dude( 70-something)...a former Marine, a retired physics professor at major university.. 2 PHd's... and soooo not poor.
his wife acts like some Indian shaman or something.. she likes her hallucinogens (acid and 'shrooms, peyote ,when she can find it)... she's a lil flighty.

In a way that makes it worse. If that guy has 2 Phd's and worked as a physics professor til retirement, and isnt poor at all, then why the hell is he selling drugs? I could more willingly accept a poor person selling weed for extra money, but a rich guy, not so much....
 
Back
Top Bottom