Moot
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 40,549
- Reaction score
- 15,452
- Location
- Utah
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
First you were all, this is a wet dream of the supposedly "not credible" editor. Making you the first regular administration defender to try and deflect the topic along more agreeable lines to administration defenders. Turns out you did not know what you were talking about when it came to the credibility of Ron Fournier. Much less the regular use of anonymous sources in political reporting. Which is why watching a poster who is clueless about all of that then offer a link to "the differences between news and op/ed" is priceless self p'wnage. But yeah, let's all give ourselves a lobotomy with a rusty tin can lid and then declare that any reporting about dissent and dissatisfaction from within the DNC and administration must not be true, it is all a "wet dream" of a not credible editor and the GOP. Then you never have to address the bad news you have managed to not address up to now. One wonders what you and other administration flak vest will do with yourself as stories and reports of this nature continue to come in as they have for what? The last nine to ten months now? What will the excuse/deflection plan be next month?
:dramallama:
The OP is still just an opinion.