What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed.....

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

danielpalos said:

Diversion is called, fallacy. What does Regulation have to do with a global and exorbitantly expensive, War on Terror?

Click to expand...

Which you seem to know well.....which is why you always deflect off any answers already given and questions given to you even with known answers already. That's Known and not in any dispute......and again that's despite you not agreeing with the Rest of the Planet.

Which is why they all put out their Answers. Leaving your understanding out of the loop. Since they didn't consider the point you make to be integral to this issue.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

ecofarm said:

I'm talking about war on a humanitarian profit basis.

Click to expand...

Our federal Congress is Only delegate the general powers to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

We should be solving our social dilemmas through a welfare-State economic paradigm and not a warfare-State economic paradigm.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

MMC said:

Which you seem to know well.....which is why you always deflect off any answers already given and questions given to you even with known answers already. That's Known and not in any dispute......and again that's despite you not agreeing with the Rest of the Planet.

Which is why they all put out their Answers. Leaving your understanding out of the loop. Since they didn't consider the point you make to be integral to this issue.

Click to expand...

What does Regulation have to do with a global and exorbitantly expensive, War on Terror? Are you claiming we are merely wasting the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

danielpalos said:

What does Regulation have to do with a global and exorbitantly expensive, War on Terror? Are you claiming we are merely wasting the (other) Peoples' tax monies.

Click to expand...

Nah, I meant I was Regulating the Thread. So that it doesn't head off back to when Socrates was discovering a thought.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

MMC said:

Nah, I meant I was Regulating the Thread. So that it doesn't head off back to when Socrates was discovering a thought.

Click to expand...

Ok. What excuse doe the right have for not being more fiscally responsible regarding our War on Terror, so that we may win eventually, even if only through attrition?

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

danielpalos said:

Ok. What excuse doe the right have for not being more fiscally responsible regarding our War on Terror, so that we may win eventually, even if only through attrition?

Click to expand...

What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesn't want the Truth to be Revealed <<<<< Title of the thread. You can see how Your question is Non Uncle Sequester like. :lol:


If you want to start a thread on that I am sure you will be able to get some interested in that.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

MMC said:

What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesn't want the Truth to be Revealed <<<<< Title of the thread. You can see how Your question is Non Uncle Sequester like. :lol:


If you want to start a thread on that I am sure you will be able to get some interested in that.

Click to expand...

Yes, being more fiscally responsible regarding our War on Terror may have lead to different decisions being made at any critical time.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

ecofarm said:

Saddam intentionally perpetuated a fake WMD program because he feared the Iranians more than he feared the UN (who had failed to act on 16 unscr violations).

Click to expand...

The U.N. took all Saddams WMD's while Clinton was Pres. There were plenty of people who knew that. Cheney's "informants" just told him what he wanted to hear...that we had a reason to invade Iraq. He also squashed all info that contradicted that lie. It was truly a sad day for America when we sent 200,000 of our men and women to become targets for Alqaeda's and Irans IED's. I'm sorry but the CIA screwup in Benghazi was nothing compared to the WMD "slamdunk".

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

MMC said:

Okay.....as the title Asks. What do you think is the Main reason or reasons that Obama and his Team do not want the truth to come out over Benghazi and the Attack with US Consulate/Annex? As well as what took place with the Attack and Death of a US Ambassador and other Americans Which would include those who were wounded and have not testified.

1. Do you think it is over Incompetence, Mismanagement, and not knowing what was going on inside Benghazi?

2. Do you think it is over the Politicization of an Election in order to get Obama Elected?

3. Do you think it was over the Anniversary of 911?

4. Do you think it was over revenge due to what was done to Gadhafi.

5. Do you think it was over an Arms deal that had to be kept secret due to Obama telling The UN and the World that the US would Not Arm the Syrian Rebels with Weapons. Which at first.....he stated no specificity as to what type of weapons light heavy or any other description. Other than No weapons and due to not knowing all those involved with the Syrian Rebels?


Or do you think it is due to some other reason and if so. Explain.....and yes some of these reasons there could be more than just one reason. Please define a reason/s or one of your own. What say ye?

Click to expand...

Maybe he doesn't want it to come out that Benghazi was the result of attempting to arm alqueada with ground to air missiles and the ambassadors and all did not want to play ball and were killed for it?

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

Unitedwestand13 said:

The attack on Benghazi occurred at the same time as multiple protests were going on. Benghazi was just one large fire in a sea of flames.

Click to expand...

And what, in your little world, does that have to do with openness and honesty in the White House?

That, sir, is the topic here, and the content of my posts, not the invented details of an imagination in free fall trying to defend a dishonest incompetent politician.

If your point, combines with the absurd comment about unlimited budgets etc., is that the United States is bankrupt and cannot afford to secure its embassies, please feel free to start a thread, I would love to see your evidence.

If your point is that cost prevented the United States from doing what every other western nation was doing, putting foreign missions on high alert, then too, I would like to see the evidence.

In any event, you are sending a strong message to terrorists; that if they create a whole lot of demonstrations on one day they can kill a lot of Americans and get away with it while Obama and his minions lie and hide the truth., While Obama's thin skin may not be troubled by this, they can kill at will.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

danielpalos said:

I would like to start where there were any direct orders to hold that understaffed diplomatic mission, at Any cost.

Click to expand...

And that straw man is relevant how?

Nice try, but for one of many who has been sneering, laughing at, and deflecting, and shouting "old news" about this, asking questions and expecting answers at this point is absurdly grotesque. While the White House, caught in lie after lie, a serial lie of "old news" for months and every new news item on this dismissed as partisan slander, yyou are in no position to ask anything.

How about you answer this....how was it that that mission was NOT on high alert when every other foreign mission of every other NATO country had been placed on alert for the anniversary of that attack American has been waging war over? How is it that Stephens was even there when Canada, little ****ed up Canada you Democrats love to ridicule had REMOVED its staff from its Embassies in Iran and Libya?

Optics.

Please, I will debate anyone, point to point, but straw men at this point are really desperate and stupid. Let us enjoy an exchange of views as to how the American President is the first in over 30 years to lose a serving ambassador and not even try to bring those responsible to justice....I have no time for an argument over invented details designed to deflect and distract.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

Fearandloathing said:

And that straw man is relevant how?

Nice try, but for one of many who has been sneering, laughing at, and deflecting, and shouting "old news" about this, asking questions and expecting answers at this point is absurdly grotesque. While the White House, caught in lie after lie, a serial lie of "old news" for months and every new news item on this dismissed as partisan slander, yyou are in no position to ask anything.

How about you answer this....how was it that that mission was NOT on high alert when every other foreign mission of every other NATO country had been placed on alert for the anniversary of that attack American has been waging war over? How is it that Stephens was even there when Canada, little ****ed up Canada you Democrats love to ridicule had REMOVED its staff from its Embassies in Iran and Libya?

Optics.

Please, I will debate anyone, point to point, but straw men at this point are really desperate and stupid. Let us enjoy an exchange of views as to how the American President is the first in over 30 years to lose a serving ambassador and not even try to bring those responsible to justice....I have no time for an argument over invented details designed to deflect and distract.

Click to expand...

It isn't a straw man argument, but a legitimate military concern. Or do you believe we should send our military, whilly nilly, to any conflict regardless of the circumstances and priorities involved.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

iguanaman said:

The U.N. took all Saddams WMD's while Clinton was Pres. There were plenty of people who knew that.

Click to expand...

Saddam as faking a WMD program. Deal with it.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

Ben who?
America doesn't care.
If this your big attack on Hillary in the next election cycle and this is all you have ...
She is a shoe in.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

Buck Ewer said:

Ben who?
America doesn't care.
If this your big attack on Hillary in the next election cycle and this is all you have ...
She is a shoe in.

Click to expand...

Pun intended?

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

danielpalos said:

It isn't a straw man argument, but a legitimate military concern. Or do you believe we should send our military, whilly nilly, to any conflict regardless of the circumstances and priorities involved.

Click to expand...

If there were any more straw men in this thread they would be remaking Wizard of OZ.

Clearly you have no intention of dealing with the topic, ignore and stonewall legitimate questions as has been the case with the lame Obama apologists since he voted "present".

Have a nice imaginary life, please feel free wasting your time responding, but you are as absent a moral compass as the sleaze bags running the country.

Re: What is the Reason for Benghazi that Obama Doesnt want the Truth to be Revealed..

Buck Ewer said:

Ben who?
America doesn't care.
If this your big attack on Hillary in the next election cycle and this is all you have ...
She is a shoe in.

Click to expand...

:Oopsie......Oh look, you must be in that Miniscule portion. Playing Marvin Gaye and asking Whats Goin On?


Sixty-eight percent (68%) of voters were following the Benghazi story at least somewhat closely in April, including 38% who were following very closely. Seventy-three percent (73%) are following it now, with 39% who are following very closely.

Eighty-two percent (82%) believe it is at least somewhat important to find out exactly what happened in the events surrounding the ambassador’s murder, up slightly from 78% in the previous survey. The new finding includes 55% who think it is Very Important. Only 15% say it’s not very or not at all important.

Sixty-one percent (61%) believe the murder was a terrorist act. Just seven percent (7%) disagree, while 32% are not sure. Only 38% think it is even somewhat likely that the murderers of the ambassador will be caught and punished, with 11% who say it is very likely. These views, too, are virtually unchanged.

Republicans remain much more interested in the Benghazi story than Democrats and voters not affiliated with either major party. GOP voters are twice as likely as Democrats – 53% to 27% – to be following it very closely.

Fifty-two percent (52%) of Democrats think the Obama administration has done a good or excellent job explaining what happened in Libya. But just eight percent (8%) of Republicans and 27% of unaffiliated voters agree.

Perhaps in part this is because only 39% of voters in the president’s party share the view of 78% of Republicans and 61% of unaffiliateds that the ambassador’s murder was a terrorist act.....snip~

NCPoliticalNews.com | Poll: Voter Views of Benghazi Are Unchanged After House Hearings

http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-po...hazi-hearing-puts-democrats-tough-spot-2.html


And, I'll bet you actual thought this is All that would be used to destroy your Precious Hill-Dog.....but then, we can see just how tuned in you are with things. :lamo