• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"My friend, make no mistake, Barack Obama is Enemy Number One!"

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Just how badly do they want to win...and, who even believes this nonsense?

Hewitt Award Nominee « The Dish


From a campaign letter written by Congressman Robert Pittenger, Chairman of the Congressional Taskforce on Terrorism & Unconventional Warfare:
You see, I am already on the front lines, taking seriously my oath of office: to defend the U.S. Constitution — and you and your fellow Americans — against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And for that I am being attacked from all sides, including from my fellow Republicans.

My friend, make no mistake, Barack Obama is Enemy Number One!

enemy-1.jpg


Isn't this a wee bit over the top?
 
Just another right wing loon in a long line of right wing loons.
 
Just another right wing loon in a long line of right wing loons.

There is no partisanship in Loon-i-ville.... They are spread throughout the political gamut... A Loon .. is a Loon .. is a Loon

:screwy :monkey

:cheers:

Thom Paine
 
There is no partisanship in Loon-i-ville.... They are spread throughout the political gamut... A Loon .. is a Loon .. is a Loon

:screwy :monkey

:cheers:

Thom Paine

Yeah. The major difference is that lefty loons are generally harmless, whereas right wing loons actually pose a threat. Especially if you are gay, a minority, or a woman.
 
Yeah. The major difference is that lefty loons are generally harmless, whereas right wing loons actually pose a threat. Especially if you are gay, a minority, or a woman.

:roll: Apparently the Loon-i-ville residents assn is having a 'group hug :2grouphug support session' for all who qualify. Applications are encouraged.

:inandout:

Thom Paine
 
Just how badly do they want to win...and, who even believes this nonsense?

Hewitt Award Nominee « The Dish


From a campaign letter written by Congressman Robert Pittenger, Chairman of the Congressional Taskforce on Terrorism & Unconventional Warfare:


enemy-1.jpg


Isn't this a wee bit over the top?

The truth hurts does it not? He is the biggest threat to freedom we have today.
 
Yeah. The major difference is that lefty loons are generally harmless, whereas right wing loons actually pose a threat. Especially if you are gay, a minority, or a woman.
Right. Ted Kaczinski was a left wing loon. So are dangerous environmental leftist loons like Earth First and others who burn down new construction and vandalize property. But how are right wing loons dangerous to women?
 
Right. Ted Kaczinski was a left wing loon. So are dangerous environmental leftist loons like Earth First and others who burn down new construction and vandalize property. But how are right wing loons dangerous to women?

If the female has a high-risk pregnancy she wants to terminate...
 
whereas right wing loons actually pose a threat. Especially if you are gay, a minority, or a woman.


or an American debt holder or an American. How many times have they tried to sabotage the economy?
 
Right. Ted Kaczinski was a left wing loon. So are dangerous environmental leftist loons like Earth First and others who burn down new construction and vandalize property. But how are right wing loons dangerous to women?

Obviously not a serious question.

However, just in case it was, here's one example:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/03/steve-king-arizona-anti-gay-bill_n_4892343.html

Oh, and here's another:

http://on.aol.com/video/lawmaker-apologizes-for-rape--abortion-remarks-518140536

And these are just from today.

But if you want to compare loony bombers, I'll match your left wing Kaczinski with the right wing nut Timothy McVeigh. Wanna compare death tolls?
 
Last edited:
or an American debt holder or an American. How many times have they tried to sabotage the economy?

Don't you know, success in the American economy is not nearly as important as ensuring failure for Barack Obama? It's how they roll.
 
Obviously not a serious question.

However, just in case it was, here's one example:

Steve King: The Problem Is Homosexuality Is 'Self-Professed,' Can't Be 'Independently Verified'

Oh, and here's another:

Lawmaker Apologizes For Rape, Abortion Remarks - AOL On

And these are just from today.

But if you want to compare loony bombers, I'll match your left wing Kaczinski with the right wing nut Timothy McVeigh. Wanna compare death tolls?
Stupid remarks don't constitute a "danger" to women. Try harder.
 
Don't you know, success in the American economy is not nearly as important as ensuring failure for Barack Obama? It's how they roll.
Do either one of you have evidence of this supposed "sabotage" or are you just engaged in a political circle jerk.
 
It's treason. No other word for it.
 
Stupid remarks don't constitute a "danger" to women. Try harder.

When the stupid remarks constitute the right wing philosophy on homosexuality and the rights of women to health care, and express a 'so what' attitude about rape and birth control, they do. And that's just two examples among many that I could have linked.

You guys on the Far Right are nuts. I know it and so do a majority of women, minorities, and homosexuals. That's why the Right loses that vote in Presidential election after Presidential election. And it's why your poster boy Rand Paul will lose the next election if we are lucky enough to have the Republicans nominate him. We'll just haul out his 'lets repeal the Civil Rights Act' quote.

You do have the old white guy/Ted Nugent vote locked up, however. Rejoice in that.

No more discussion on wing nut bombers from you? Kaczinski versus McVeigh? Ask the people in Oklahoma City who the biggest thread was.
 
Barack Obama is many things, some good some bad, but one thing he is not--public enemy #1.
 
When the stupid remarks constitute the right wing philosophy on homosexuality and the rights of women to health care, and express a 'so what' attitude about rape and birth control, they do. And that's just two examples among many that I could have linked.
Except that is just you lying. Those remarks do not represent the right wing philosophy, they represent the unfiltered musings of morons. You, lacking the ability to actually debate issues on the merit, just find it easier to smear. But that is just how you liberals operate so no one is surprised by the tactic.

You guys on the Far Right are nuts. I know it and so do a majority of women, minorities, and homosexuals. That's why the Right loses that vote in Presidential election after Presidential election. And it's why your poster boy Rand Paul will lose the next election if we are lucky enough to have the Republicans nominate him. We'll just haul out his 'lets repeal the Civil Rights Act' quote.
The error Rand Paul made was trying to make an argument based upon principle to a liberal. He should know that sort of thing isn't possible. Liberals don't think in terms of principle or rational thought, they react based upon emotion. So any attempt to reach you guys on a rational level is somewhat pointless.
 
Right. Ted Kaczinski was a left wing loon. So are dangerous environmental leftist loons like Earth First and others who burn down new construction and vandalize property. But how are right wing loons dangerous to women?

Where is ol Ted these days?
 
Stupid remarks don't constitute a "danger" to women. Try harder.

How about "the state" requiring a transvaginal sonogram in order to have a lawful abortion.

Imagine "the state" requiring a potential gun purchaser to have an psychological exam prior to be allowed to purchase a firearm...
 
How about "the state" requiring a transvaginal sonogram in order to have a lawful abortion.

Imagine "the state" requiring a potential gun purchaser to have an psychological exam prior to be allowed to purchase a firearm...
Is a transvaginal sonogram 'dangerous?'

And I do love the sudden leftist opposition to the government 'requiring' people to do things. lol Good one.
 
Is a transvaginal sonogram 'dangerous?'

And I do love the sudden leftist opposition to the government 'requiring' people to do things. lol Good one.


Forcing my wife to be raped by someone with a wonder wand.....is very dangerous for the person doing so.
 
Is a transvaginal sonogram 'dangerous?'

And I do love the sudden leftist opposition to the government 'requiring' people to do things. lol Good one.


All of a sudden...where have you been?

"Do things"...what the hell does that mean?

Which medical procedure on your body does the left advocate and require by law for Americans to have done in order to excercise a right? I'll make it even easier for you, name any medical procedure advocated by the left and required by law.

I would draw some comparison between "liberals' and "Libertarians" but libertarians don't legislate...they hypothesize. Libertairans live in the realm of "what ifs" and "would be nice".
 
All of a sudden...where have you been?

"Do things"...what the hell does that mean?

Which medical procedure on your body does the left advocate and require by law for Americans to have done in order to excercise a right? I'll make it even easier for you, name any medical procedure advocated by the left and required by law.

I would draw some comparison between "liberals' and "Libertarians" but libertarians don't legislate...they hypothesize. Libertairans live in the realm of "what ifs" and "would be nice".
Are you so out of touch with your own ideology that you are unaware that the great state you idolize has a virtually limitless list of things individuals are 'required' to do? Suddenly you have found one requirement you don't like and you go haywire. Pretty sad.
 
Back
Top Bottom