• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Benghazi Heckler Interrupts Hillary Clinton Speech: 'You Let Them Die'

code1211 said:
The statement is true.
Click to expand...

thank you for reassuring us that what you post is true. See how in your mind what you post doesn't need need to be backed up. Why why why do cons think what they want to believe is fact? you posted a vile and disgusting example of exactly what is wrong with conservative media and the ignorant conservative base. Again, even the republican report on Benghazi doesn't even mention that vile and disgusting lie.

thanks for proving me right though.
 
Last edited:
Vern said:
thank you for reassuring us that what you post is true. See how in your mind what you post doesn't need need to be backed up. Why why why do cons think what they want to believe is fact? you posted a vile and disgusting example of exactly what is wrong with conservative media and the ignorant conservative base. Again, even the republican report on Benghazi doesn't even mention that vile and disgusting lie.

thanks for proving me right though.
Click to expand...

So, to be clear, who's fault was it that the defenses were not enhanced when the 5 discreet requests were submitted?

Who's fault was it that the personnel were stationed in a war zone?

Whose fault was it that the war zone was utterly and completely left defenseless on the anniversary of 9/11 in spite of the fact that 40% of the world's military budget is spent unwisely by the USA?

Whose fault was it that military professionals who were ready to respond were told to stand down?

Are you saying that the Republicans who were nowhere near the decision making were the ones who made this so vile and reprehensibly, criminally incompetent and politically motivated?

Your completely idiotic interpretation of reality is an embarrassment to thinking people everywhere. You are not describable within the limits provided by the forum.
 
code1211 said:
So, to be clear, who's fault was it that the defenses were not enhanced when the 5 discreet requests were submitted?

Who's fault was it that the personnel were stationed in a war zone?

Whose fault was it that the war zone was utterly and completely left defenseless on the anniversary of 9/11 in spite of the fact that 40% of the world's military budget is spent unwisely by the USA?

Whose fault was it that military professionals who were ready to respond were told to stand down?

Are you saying that the Republicans who were nowhere near the decision making were the ones who made this so vile and reprehensibly, criminally incompetent and politically motivated?

Your completely idiotic interpretation of reality is an embarrassment to thinking people everywhere. You are not describable within the limits provided by the forum.
Click to expand...

that's the thing about surprise attacks. it's hard to react when you are stunned.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
that's the thing about surprise attacks. it's hard to react when you are stunned.
Click to expand...



And the non-reaction from the Obama puppets reinforces the validity of the saying that hope is not a plan.

When everything that is done or thought is always prefaced by whether or not it will impact the election results and poll numbers, the leader is only a politician.

Our leader is only a politician. A very good politician. Aa a president, he would make a good community organizer.
 
So is Hitlary still going with the "it doesn't matter" dodge or has she come up with an even more scumbaggy excuse?
 
Well.....When the left starts to remember the testimony from the hearings and that important part about Hillary not calling back to check on her people. After speaking with Hicks and being told what the hell was going on at the time.....might be the type of clue to show them just how much she really thinks about those underneath her.
 
Muhammed said:
So is Hitlary still going with the "it doesn't matter" dodge or has she come up with an even more scumbaggy excuse?
Click to expand...

She did better.....she got word to Soro's. He then made sure her action pak will now have money.

Do you think it will help her after people start talking about How she and Obama dropped the ball on the Anniversary of 911. Despite being warned by the Libyans, 3days earlier that it was to dangerous to conduct business in Benghazi. Now why do you think the Libyans would use that type of terminology with giving a warning one full day ahead of al-Zawahiri releasing his AQ warning?

Think she will like seeing Gigantic posters of Stevens body being dragged into the streets when she goes to run for the Presidency? Do you think she was hoping that the MS media would keep her protected?
 
head of joaquin said:
No, you probably tried to kill them. Think Pat Tillman.
Click to expand...

Oh cmon now.....no one can do as a good as a job as Democrats overseas now. Maybe that 58k from NAM will clue you in. When the Repubs can match such grandiosity. Then you can actually give them credit for at least trying to compare to such awesomeness.
 
Drake McHugh said:
Cry me a damn river. It happened and that bitch couldn't care less. That you care more about a moment of discomfort on her part than those that died because of her and Obama's sheer laziness speaks to your values,or lack of them.
Click to expand...

:yawn::yawn::sinking::sinking:
 
TheDemSocialist said:
9/11, Iraq War. Yea right...
Click to expand...



Care to expand on that?

In stark contrast to the Benghazi attack by enemies of America in a war zone with a very weak infant government to protect and various threats that are well documented, there was no prior notice for the original 9/11. I don't see the parallel. Perhaps you could explain it.

I see no connection to the Iraq war in this. The Iraq war was a mistake, as was Viet Nam, and both should be our guide in removing our tentacles from the foreign entanglements, but I don't see how this connects to the comment in any way whatsoever.
 
code1211 said:
Care to expand on that?
Click to expand...
Where were they trying to "save" them on 9/11? How bout the whole lies about WMDS, and Al-Qaeda connections with Saddam. I mean didnt real try that hard to "save them" now did they?
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]Benghazi Heckler Interrupts Hillary Clinton Speech: 'You Let Them Die' - YouTube

If you are a democrat and someone dies under you its directly your fault, but if you are a republican and someone dies under you its just the way of the world.
Click to expand...


oh please, this type of narrative requires us to simply ignore the vast amount of incidences involving republicans while Bush was Potus concerning things like the Iraq war.

Why even post something so fundamentally dishonest?
 
upsideguy said:
Yep, the Cons went political blood over 4 people dying at an outpost in an unstable Arab country, but no one even got fired for 3,000 + US citizens dying in New York and Washington.
Click to expand...

No, it was just viewed as a vast conspiracy orchestrated to initiate their NWO objectives ...
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]Benghazi Heckler Interrupts Hillary Clinton Speech: 'You Let Them Die' - YouTube

If you are a democrat and someone dies under you its directly your fault, but if you are a republican and someone dies under you its just the way of the world.
Click to expand...

Funny, Democrats and people like you have consistently blamed Bush for the deaths on 9/11 and the loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan - you have a pretty selective memory, or perhaps none at all.
 
code1211 said:
If you are a Republican and somebody dies under your watch, you probably tried to save them.
Click to expand...

Uh huh....:roll:

I have some swampland to sell you if you believe that.
 
Vern said:
Lets examine the "bush lied" aspect. Bush repeatedly claimed Iraq had WMDs.
Click to expand...

You realize that Saddam proliferated the idea that he had WMD's among his own inner circle to help maintain control and project power? I mean, if the very people closest to him and who had an active inner knowledge of the military thought such things existed then it's surely not unreasonable to assume that some intelligence reports would also reflect that.

Can you fault the Bush administration over Iraq on numerous fronts? Indeed, and you should, namely for their unwillingness to consider alternative theories and reports. Is there any actual proof that they actively lied and didn't believe there were WMD's on the ground? None that I am aware of. So yes, as you demonstrate above, the claimes are very similar in their need to ignore the complexity of both situations, and largely dependent on partisan interests
 
head of joaquin said:
Yeah, I wonder if there is a difference between Benghazi and starting two vanity wars that cost $3T and cost thousands of American lives.

I wonder . . .
Click to expand...

It's telling that you would consider Afghanistan to be a Bush "vanity war" - are you actually American or just one who hates his own country.

Was Obama's escalation of the war in Afghanistan a "vanity play" on his part? How many Americans have died in Afghanistan since Obama came to office?

Was Libya a "vanity war" for Obama? What were the American national interests in that backwater?

I'm a Canadian and I have more love for your great country than you ever will.
 
CanadaJohn said:
Funny, Democrats and people like you have consistently blamed Bush for the deaths on 9/11 and the loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan - you have a pretty selective memory, or perhaps none at all.
Click to expand...

To be completely fair, Bush chose to invade Iraq. So some of the responsibility rests with him. That's just Iraq though.

The fact that the CIA was on the ground in Benghazi tells me more about the reality of the situation than anything else. The Ambassador was involved in something the CIA was doing, and the government usually isn't in the business of swooping in to save people involved in covert ****. That's how that usually works regardless of party.
 
rocket88 said:
To be completely fair, Bush chose to invade Iraq. So some of the responsibility rests with him. That's just Iraq though.

The fact that the CIA was on the ground in Benghazi tells me more about the reality of the situation than anything else. The Ambassador was involved in something the CIA was doing, and the government usually isn't in the business of swooping in to save people involved in covert ****. That's how that usually works regardless of party.
Click to expand...

That may be true and valid - it may also be true that the Ambassador had zero knowledge of CIA activities in Libya or only passing knowledge of their involvement there. It is also true that if the CIA was conducting covert operations in Benghazi, the State Department should have known and should have better protected him. If nothing else, the former marines and seals who were his closest bodyguards should have been made aware of the eminent danger and been better prepared.
 
CanadaJohn said:
That may be true and valid - it may also be true that the Ambassador had zero knowledge of CIA activities in Libya or only passing knowledge of their involvement there. It is also true that if the CIA was conducting covert operations in Benghazi, the State Department should have known and should have better protected him. If nothing else, the former marines and seals who were his closest bodyguards should have been made aware of the eminent danger and been better prepared.
Click to expand...

Either way CJ.....lets just hope she keeps seeing the hecklers and the Pics. Gigantic posters of Stevens Body being dragged around. Everywhere she goes to speak. So she has the visual in knowing whats coming her way.
 
MMC said:
Either way CJ.....lets just hope she keeps seeing the hecklers and the Pics. Gigantic posters of Stevens Body being dragged around. Everywhere she goes to speak. So she has the visual in knowing whats coming her way.
Click to expand...

She's a Clinton and a liberal - it won't matter one iota to her - Clintons specifically and liberals in general have no shame and no ability to be embarrassed by reminders of their past.
 
code1211 said:
Whose fault was it that military professionals who were ready to respond were told to stand down?
.
Click to expand...

and thats why you and your posts have zero credibility. You not only refuse to back up anything you post and you not only ask questions as if its my duty to back up your delusions but you have once again tried to add credibilty to that vile and disgusting lie. No one was told to stand down and no one was left to die. But as a conservative, you have no problem with such a vile and disgusting lie because it serves your agenda and your emotional need to believe that agenda.

Just to be clear, will we be discussing the magic C130s you mentioned anymore?
 
Yea, think about how it started out, up to the election Faux was talking about Marine and army units in close proximity (turns out it was 2 guys, I think) and they would have just added to the death toll. There were jets that could have flown over and scared off the bad guys, drones and AC 130 that could of blown up the bad guys and on and on adn on. Turns out not a damn one of them were true, but the RWers insist on reapeating them to this day. Is that lies or delusion?
Vern said:
and thats why you and your posts have zero credibility. You not only refuse to back up anything you post and you not only ask questions as if its my duty to back up your delusions but you have once again tried to add credibilty to that vile and disgusting lie. No one was told to stand down and no one was left to die. But as a conservative, you have no problem with such a vile and disgusting lie because it serves your agenda and your emotional need to believe that agenda.

Just to be clear, will we be discussing the magic C130s you mentioned anymore?
Click to expand...
 
CanadaJohn said:
She's a Clinton and a liberal - it won't matter one iota to her - Clintons specifically and liberals in general have no shame and no ability to be embarrassed by reminders of their past.
Click to expand...

Dammit.....you mean I wont be able to use my new shiny bullhorn to yell out Test her Mentally. Lets get that Psychological Eval Hill-dog? What Medications did you say you were on? Don't even think about Playing a Jesse Jackson Jr. You Aint Bipolar.....Maybe a bit ODD. But not Bipolar.......You Lie! :lamo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom