![]() |
|
|
|
#531 |
|
Side effects include...
Mod Team Member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: Today 01:01 AM
Location: Ullinois
Posts: 34,004
Thanks: 9,603
Thanked 7,022 Times in 4,809 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
|
|
__________________
☠☠☠☠☠ I am a Tiki Bar Tarte, you wanna mount Le Penseur Bronze ![]() |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to independent_thinker2002 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#532 |
|
Beilski Partisan
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Last Seen: Today 03:43 AM
Location: The belly of Leviathan
Posts: 4,310
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 1,501 Times in 999 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
|
|
__________________
Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.- H. L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#533 |
|
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
|
|
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#534 |
|
King of Videos
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Last Seen: 03-11-10 11:23 AM
Location: Mount Vernon, WA
Posts: 2,813
Thanks: 464
Thanked 402 Times in 298 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
|
Re: Paul in 2012?
I didn't know that. I thought it was more. I wonder exactly what it is in though. (How much of a percentage of ports and shipping needed for California?) and what the percent would be in correlation to business needs instead of general and overall holdings. I'm not sure what the Chinese invest in America. How strategically effective is their investment and control through investment.
|
|
__________________
America. God is wearing black. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#535 |
|
Beilski Partisan
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Last Seen: Today 03:43 AM
Location: The belly of Leviathan
Posts: 4,310
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 1,501 Times in 999 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
Maybe it isn't such a bad idea then. If they dispose of it in a slow way, I don't mind them having less leverage on us in that respect.
|
|
__________________
Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.- H. L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#536 | |
|
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
Quote:
When the Chinese government buys US public debt, they're not "investing" in any particular type of industry. They're buying US Treasury securities. |
|
|
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#537 | ||
|
Capitalist Fat-Cat
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:19 AM
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,020
Thanks: 7,645
Thanked 4,074 Times in 2,300 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
Quote:
Quote:
I just wanted him in the White House because he will actually bring a strong fiscally conservative influence along with a socially liberal outlook. He would provide a much needed balance to Washington and push us in the right direction, that's all. Furthermore, I would trust libertarians to keep a watchful eye on Dr. Paul were he to get elected far more than I trust these Obamaphiles to do anything. Every time Obama is caught in a bald-faced lie all I hear from them is... *CRICKET* *CRICKET* THAT is scary. That's how governments become tyrannical. You wouldn't see any of that nonsense coming from the likes of me, and I'm quite certain that the other libertarian-leaning posters feel the same way. I would put Dr. Paul on blast so fast it would make your head spin. Hell, I'd be the first one to post the article... |
||
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ethereal For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
#538 |
|
Budtender
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 12:49 PM
Location: Evansville Indiana
Posts: 4,133
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 788 Times in 569 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
FRB: H.3 Release--Aggregate Reserves of Depository Institutions--February 12, 2009
U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve compare with: U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve Or any other years of your choice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE , TCMNOMY30 1977, 7.75 1978, 8.49 1979, 9.28 1980, 11.27 1981, 13.45 1982, 12.76 > 10% unemployment 1983, 11.18 1984, 12.41 1985, 10.79 1986, 7.78 1987, 8.59 1988, 8.96 1989, 8.45 1990, 8.61 1991, 8.14 > 7.3% unemployment 1992, 7.67 1993, 6.59 1994, 7.37 1995, 6.88 1996, 6.71 1997, 6.61 1998, 5.58 1999, 5.87 2000, 5.94 > 3.8% unemployment 2001, 5.49 2002, 5.43 2003, ND 2004, ND 2005, ND 2006, 4.91 2007, 4.84 2008, 4.28 > 7.2% unemployment while yield lows hit 2.8% Source ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 month treasury: 09/16/2008, 0.84 09/17/2008, 0.03 09/18/2008, 0.23 09/19/2008, 0.99 09/22/2008, 1.28 09/23/2008, 0.80 09/24/2008, 0.49 09/25/2008, 0.76 09/26/2008, 0.87 09/29/2008, 0.94 09/30/2008, 0.92 10/01/2008, 0.85 10/02/2008, 0.63 10/03/2008, 0.51 10/06/2008, 0.54 10/07/2008, 0.82 10/08/2008, 0.68 10/09/2008, 0.60 10/10/2008, 0.25 10/13/2008, ND 10/14/2008, 0.34 10/15/2008, 0.22 10/16/2008, 0.46 10/17/2008, 0.83 10/20/2008, 1.24 10/21/2008, 1.10 10/22/2008, 1.05 10/23/2008, 0.98 10/24/2008, 0.89 10/27/2008, 0.84 10/28/2008, 0.77 10/29/2008, 0.62 10/30/2008, 0.41 10/31/2008, 0.46 11/03/2008, 0.49 11/04/2008, 0.48 11/05/2008, 0.40 11/06/2008, 0.32 11/07/2008, 0.31 11/10/2008, 0.29 11/11/2008, ND 11/12/2008, 0.18 11/13/2008, 0.22 11/14/2008, 0.15 11/17/2008, 0.12 11/18/2008, 0.12 11/19/2008, 0.07 11/20/2008, 0.03 11/21/2008, 0.02 11/24/2008, 0.13 11/25/2008, 0.10 11/26/2008, 0.05 11/27/2008, ND 11/28/2008, 0.01 12/01/2008, 0.07 12/02/2008, 0.06 12/03/2008, 0.02 12/04/2008, 0.02 12/05/2008, 0.02 12/08/2008, 0.03 12/09/2008, 0.03 12/10/2008, 0.00 > actually negative 12/11/2008, 0.01 12/12/2008, 0.02 12/15/2008, 0.03 12/16/2008, 0.04 12/17/2008, 0.05 12/18/2008, 0.00 > no.2 low 12/19/2008, 0.02 12/22/2008, 0.01 12/23/2008, 0.02 12/24/2008, 0.00 12/25/2008, ND 12/26/2008, 0.03 12/29/2008, 0.06 12/30/2008, 0.10 12/31/2008, 0.11 01/01/2009, ND 01/02/2009, 0.08 01/05/2009, 0.14 01/06/2009, 0.14 01/07/2009, 0.11 01/08/2009, 0.09 01/09/2009, 0.07 01/12/2009, 0.12 01/13/2009, 0.11 01/14/2009, 0.12 01/15/2009, 0.11 01/16/2009, 0.12 01/19/2009, ND 01/20/2009, 0.13 01/21/2009, 0.11 01/22/2009, 0.10 01/23/2009, 0.11 01/26/2009, 0.14 01/27/2009, 0.13 01/28/2009, 0.19 01/29/2009, 0.23 01/30/2009, 0.24 02/02/2009, 0.27 02/03/2009, 0.32 02/04/2009, 0.30 02/05/2009, 0.29 02/06/2009, 0.28 02/09/2009, 0.32 02/10/2009, 0.31 02/11/2009, 0.30 02/12/2009, 0.29 02/13/2009, 0.29 > getting better 02/16/2009, ND (In retrospect, the previous low in the 3 month credit auction was in 1929, @0.05) Compare to: 01/04/1982, 11.87 01/05/1982, 12.20 01/06/1982, 12.16 01/07/1982, 12.17 01/08/1982, 11.98 01/11/1982, 12.49 01/12/1982, 12.52 01/13/1982, 12.70 01/14/1982, 13.17 01/15/1982, 12.74 01/18/1982, 13.41 01/19/1982, 13.13 01/20/1982, 13.51 01/21/1982, 13.65 01/22/1982, 13.63 01/25/1982, 14.06 01/26/1982, 13.65 01/27/1982, 13.40 01/28/1982, 12.84 01/29/1982, 13.08 02/01/1982, 14.77 02/02/1982, 14.49 02/03/1982, 14.64 02/04/1982, 14.38 02/05/1982, 14.63 02/08/1982, 15.04 02/09/1982, 14.91 02/10/1982, 14.88 02/11/1982, 15.06 02/12/1982, ND 02/15/1982, ND 02/16/1982, 15.49 02/17/1982, 15.31 > all time high 02/18/1982, 14.58 02/19/1982, 14.17 02/22/1982, 13.13 02/23/1982, 12.93 02/24/1982, 12.83 02/25/1982, 12.79 02/26/1982, 13.00 03/01/1982, 12.81 03/02/1982, 13.22 03/03/1982, 12.85 03/04/1982, 12.85 03/05/1982, 12.86 03/08/1982, 12.68 03/09/1982, 12.93 03/10/1982, 13.00 03/11/1982, 13.24 03/12/1982, 13.40 03/15/1982, 13.47 03/16/1982, 13.33 03/17/1982, 13.36 03/18/1982, 13.45 03/19/1982, 13.69 03/22/1982, 13.26 03/23/1982, 13.11 03/24/1982, 13.39 03/25/1982, 13.35 03/26/1982, 13.69 03/29/1982, 14.16 03/30/1982, 14.15 03/31/1982, 13.99 04/01/1982, 13.87 04/02/1982, 13.95 04/05/1982, 13.76 04/06/1982, 13.77 04/07/1982, 13.80 04/08/1982, 13.74 04/09/1982, ND 04/12/1982, 13.43 04/13/1982, 13.33 04/14/1982, 13.44 04/15/1982, 13.47 04/16/1982, 13.21 04/19/1982, 13.04 04/20/1982, 13.07 04/21/1982, 12.73 04/22/1982, 12.99 04/23/1982, 12.99 04/26/1982, 13.17 04/27/1982, 13.04 04/28/1982, 13.09 04/29/1982, 13.20 04/30/1982, 13.15 05/03/1982, 13.46 05/04/1982, 13.60 05/05/1982, 13.39 05/06/1982, 13.08 05/07/1982, 13.02 05/10/1982, 13.21 05/11/1982, 12.97 05/12/1982, 13.05 05/13/1982, 13.09 05/14/1982, 12.92 05/17/1982, 13.02 05/18/1982, 12.88 05/19/1982, 12.47 05/20/1982, 12.00 05/21/1982, 11.99 05/24/1982, 11.99 05/25/1982, 12.07 05/26/1982, 12.04 05/27/1982, 12.06 05/28/1982, 11.97 05/31/1982, ND 06/01/1982, 12.55 06/02/1982, 12.69 06/03/1982, 12.63 06/04/1982, 12.78 06/07/1982, 12.71 06/08/1982, 12.79 06/09/1982, 12.62 06/10/1982, 12.52 06/11/1982, 12.55 06/14/1982, 12.88 06/15/1982, 12.93 06/16/1982, 13.03 06/17/1982, 13.15 06/18/1982, 13.31 06/21/1982, 13.11 06/22/1982, 13.37 06/23/1982, 13.67 06/24/1982, 13.60 06/25/1982, 13.87 06/28/1982, 13.81 06/29/1982, 13.80 06/30/1982, 13.36 07/01/1982, 13.14 07/02/1982, 13.36 07/05/1982, ND 07/06/1982, 13.18 07/07/1982, 13.31 07/08/1982, 12.48 07/09/1982, 12.29 07/12/1982, 12.22 07/13/1982, 12.48 07/14/1982, 12.53 07/15/1982, 12.14 07/16/1982, 11.68 07/19/1982, 11.52 07/20/1982, 11.11 07/21/1982, 11.19 07/22/1982, 10.83 07/23/1982, 10.73 07/26/1982, 10.87 07/27/1982, 11.12 07/28/1982, 11.41 07/29/1982, 10.97 07/30/1982, 10.57 08/02/1982, 9.72 08/03/1982, 10.18 08/04/1982, 10.12 08/05/1982, 10.19 08/06/1982, 10.71 08/09/1982, 10.25 08/10/1982, 10.42 08/11/1982, 10.37 08/12/1982, 9.74 08/13/1982, 9.60 08/16/1982, 8.98 08/17/1982, 8.33 08/18/1982, 8.35 08/19/1982, 7.76 08/20/1982, 7.31 08/23/1982, 7.75 08/24/1982, 7.86 08/25/1982, 7.67 08/26/1982, 7.37 08/27/1982, 8.10 08/30/1982, 8.44 08/31/1982, 8.72 09/01/1982, 8.73 09/02/1982, 8.66 09/03/1982, 8.46 09/06/1982, ND 09/07/1982, 8.68 09/08/1982, 8.60 09/09/1982, 8.57 09/10/1982, 8.66 09/13/1982, 8.41 09/14/1982, 8.16 09/15/1982, 8.44 09/16/1982, 8.31 09/17/1982, 8.23 09/20/1982, 8.04 09/21/1982, 7.88 09/22/1982, 7.58 09/23/1982, 7.52 09/24/1982, 7.85 09/27/1982, 7.83 09/28/1982, 7.72 09/29/1982, 7.84 09/30/1982, 7.88 10/01/1982, 7.60 10/04/1982, 8.21 10/05/1982, 8.44 10/06/1982, 8.33 10/07/1982, 8.04 10/08/1982, 8.00 Source -------------------------------------------------------------------- ![]() compare with ![]() ---------------------------------------------------------------- Feel free to synthesize the information as you please. |
|
__________________
Be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the present. For in the present is where we shape our future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#539 | |||||
|
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
I have no idea what you think any of this proves.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#540 | |||
|
Budtender
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 12:49 PM
Location: Evansville Indiana
Posts: 4,133
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 788 Times in 569 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Paul in 2012?
Quote:
This is not your "bad" recession of the 50's, 70's, 80's, and 90's lol. Treasury yields illustrate the rational of the investor, and they are scared, otherwise we would not have everything going to 0. Banks are experimenting with quantitative/credit easing strategies that signal the banking system has great deals of insolvency. All without the possibility of a true bank run due to the lush reserves pumped into the system. And yet, another one of your attempts to paint it as im some sort of crazy lunatic. As stated before, i do not want to convince you of anything. The numbers are there, the US economy has never faced such a scenario as it does now, not even in 1929. Coming from the guy who was telling people to invest in S&P indexes last year, and your failure to acknowledge the significance, i can give two ****s what you think and believe. Rates are at ZERO, and demand for money seems to have reduced its velocity, rendering the Fed ineffective via a liquidity trap (unprecedented in the US). Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
__________________
Be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the present. For in the present is where we shape our future. |
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|