Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > US Political Discussion > US Elections



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-09, 05:30 PM   #531
Side effects include...
Mod Team Member


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: Today 01:01 AM
Location: Ullinois
Posts: 34,004
Thanks: 9,603
Thanked 7,022 Times in 4,809 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Dungeon Master Veteran:  Former Dungeon Master Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jallman View Post
I can see people doing irrational things when they are starving.
Actually the run was immediately after the Market Crash. It was a panic. They weren't starving yet. They exaserbated the conditions by panicking and made things worse.

At least we rotate crops now.
__________________
☠☠☠☠☠

I am a Tiki Bar Tarte, you wanna mount Le Penseur Bronze

independent_thinker2002 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to independent_thinker2002 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-09, 05:30 PM   #532
Beilski Partisan

 
Harry Guerrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Last Seen: Today 03:43 AM
Location: The belly of Leviathan
Posts: 4,310
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 1,501 Times in 999 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
1) China has been thinking about this for years, it's nothing new.
2) China actually owns far less of our debt than is popularly believed: a little over 6%.
Our value of money is based on perception though. At least part of the value.
__________________
Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.- H. L. Mencken
Harry Guerrilla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 05:32 PM   #533
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member


 
RightinNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Guerrilla View Post
Our value of money is based on perception though. At least part of the value.
But it's not as if the perceived value of our dollar vis a vis other world currencies is significantly lower now than in recent years.
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
RightinNYC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 05:34 PM   #534
King of Videos

 
dirtpoorchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Last Seen: 03-11-10 11:23 AM
Location: Mount Vernon, WA
Posts: 2,813
Thanks: 464
Thanked 402 Times in 298 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
1) China has been thinking about this for years, it's nothing new.
2) China actually owns far less of our debt than is popularly believed: a little over 6%.
I didn't know that. I thought it was more. I wonder exactly what it is in though. (How much of a percentage of ports and shipping needed for California?) and what the percent would be in correlation to business needs instead of general and overall holdings. I'm not sure what the Chinese invest in America. How strategically effective is their investment and control through investment.
__________________



America. God is wearing black.
dirtpoorchris is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 05:38 PM   #535
Beilski Partisan

 
Harry Guerrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Last Seen: Today 03:43 AM
Location: The belly of Leviathan
Posts: 4,310
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 1,501 Times in 999 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
But it's not as if the perceived value of our dollar vis a vis other world currencies is significantly lower now than in recent years.
Maybe it isn't such a bad idea then. If they dispose of it in a slow way, I don't mind them having less leverage on us in that respect.
__________________
Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses.- H. L. Mencken
Harry Guerrilla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 05:39 PM   #536
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member


 
RightinNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtpoorchris View Post
I didn't know that. I thought it was more. I wonder exactly what it is in though. (How much of a percentage of ports and shipping needed for California?) and what the percent would be in correlation to business needs instead of general and overall holdings. I'm not sure what the Chinese invest in America. How strategically effective is their investment and control through investment.
Uh....

When the Chinese government buys US public debt, they're not "investing" in any particular type of industry. They're buying US Treasury securities.
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
RightinNYC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 06:17 PM   #537
Capitalist Fat-Cat

 
Ethereal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Today 03:19 AM
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,020
Thanks: 7,645
Thanked 4,074 Times in 2,300 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

US Marines:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
These are not "fringe examples," these are the issues at the crux of the question.
I think there is a miscommunication of sorts, although it's probably due to my poor explanation. What I'm trying to say is this, the simple maxim of "life, liberty, and property" interpreted as negative rights gives us a clear understanding of the underlying principle guiding the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which, subsequently, may be applied as a litmus test for anything we might need to analyze. Simply because some things (abortion, gay marriage) may prove difficult to decipher even when using this litmus test does not, in my opinion, undermine it as a legal construction.

Quote:
Here's what I'm saying:

Say that NCFY thinks that the 14th Amendment includes everything I listed up to and including the right to gay marriage.

Say that I agree with him on every issue except for gay marriage.

Say that you agree with me on every issue except for abortion.

Say that one of the other posters in this thread disagrees with all of us on all of them, and thinks that the federal government does not have the authority to regulate social issues like segregation, etc.

Now we have 4 people, each of whom has a different view on what constitutes a fundamental right. Each of us believes that the purpose of the federal government is to secure these fundamental rights to all people.

If I were to propose devolving the power to decide gay marriage issues to the states, NCFY would be furious because he believes that that's a fundamental right that the Constitution protects. If you were to propose devolving the power to decide abortion issues to the states, NCFY and I would (hypothetically) be furious because we believe that that's a fundamental right that the Constitution protects. If an unnamed poster were to propose devolving segregation and miscegenation issues to the states, NCFY, you, and I would be furious because we believe that those are fundamental rights that the Constitution protects.

Under our current system, this disagreement is merely a disagreement, because the federal government ensures that systems remain uniform across the country. If people want things changed, they lobby their government and we see the results.

Under the system imagined by Ron Paul and some others in this thread, the result would be far more serious. If each state were authorized to come to its own conclusions on each of these issues, there would be no consensus as to what were the most fundamental rights. The things that NCFY, you, and I consider to be "natural rights" would not be honored in states where they could garner 51% of the population that would agree with the unnamed poster. That is not what the founders intended, nor is it a bright future for this country.
Yes, I agree with all of that. What I'm trying to say is that not all libertarians hold this view, hence my irksome reply to NCFY. I support Ron Paul and I adhere to a decidedly libertarian viewpoint, but this does not mean I necessarily agree with everything they have to say. I sincerely and honestly doubt that a Ron Paul Presidency could do half the things he claims he wants to do. A President is not a dictator.

I just wanted him in the White House because he will actually bring a strong fiscally conservative influence along with a socially liberal outlook. He would provide a much needed balance to Washington and push us in the right direction, that's all. Furthermore, I would trust libertarians to keep a watchful eye on Dr. Paul were he to get elected far more than I trust these Obamaphiles to do anything. Every time Obama is caught in a bald-faced lie all I hear from them is...

*CRICKET* *CRICKET*

THAT is scary. That's how governments become tyrannical. You wouldn't see any of that nonsense coming from the likes of me, and I'm quite certain that the other libertarian-leaning posters feel the same way. I would put Dr. Paul on blast so fast it would make your head spin. Hell, I'd be the first one to post the article...
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ethereal For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-09, 06:59 PM   #538
Budtender


 
Goldenboy219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 12:49 PM
Location: Evansville Indiana
Posts: 4,133
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 788 Times in 569 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Paul in 2012?

FRB: H.3 Release--Aggregate Reserves of Depository Institutions--February 12, 2009

U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve

compare with:

U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve

Or any other years of your choice.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE , TCMNOMY30
1977, 7.75
1978, 8.49
1979, 9.28
1980, 11.27
1981, 13.45
1982, 12.76 > 10% unemployment
1983, 11.18
1984, 12.41
1985, 10.79
1986, 7.78
1987, 8.59
1988, 8.96
1989, 8.45
1990, 8.61
1991, 8.14 > 7.3% unemployment
1992, 7.67
1993, 6.59
1994, 7.37
1995, 6.88
1996, 6.71
1997, 6.61
1998, 5.58
1999, 5.87
2000, 5.94 > 3.8% unemployment
2001, 5.49
2002, 5.43
2003, ND
2004, ND
2005, ND
2006, 4.91
2007, 4.84
2008, 4.28 > 7.2% unemployment while yield lows hit 2.8%

Source
-------------------------------------------------------------------

3 month treasury:

09/16/2008, 0.84
09/17/2008, 0.03
09/18/2008, 0.23
09/19/2008, 0.99
09/22/2008, 1.28
09/23/2008, 0.80
09/24/2008, 0.49
09/25/2008, 0.76
09/26/2008, 0.87
09/29/2008, 0.94
09/30/2008, 0.92
10/01/2008, 0.85
10/02/2008, 0.63
10/03/2008, 0.51
10/06/2008, 0.54
10/07/2008, 0.82
10/08/2008, 0.68
10/09/2008, 0.60
10/10/2008, 0.25
10/13/2008, ND
10/14/2008, 0.34
10/15/2008, 0.22
10/16/2008, 0.46
10/17/2008, 0.83
10/20/2008, 1.24
10/21/2008, 1.10
10/22/2008, 1.05
10/23/2008, 0.98
10/24/2008, 0.89
10/27/2008, 0.84
10/28/2008, 0.77
10/29/2008, 0.62
10/30/2008, 0.41
10/31/2008, 0.46
11/03/2008, 0.49
11/04/2008, 0.48
11/05/2008, 0.40
11/06/2008, 0.32
11/07/2008, 0.31
11/10/2008, 0.29
11/11/2008, ND
11/12/2008, 0.18
11/13/2008, 0.22
11/14/2008, 0.15
11/17/2008, 0.12
11/18/2008, 0.12
11/19/2008, 0.07
11/20/2008, 0.03
11/21/2008, 0.02
11/24/2008, 0.13
11/25/2008, 0.10
11/26/2008, 0.05
11/27/2008, ND
11/28/2008, 0.01
12/01/2008, 0.07
12/02/2008, 0.06
12/03/2008, 0.02
12/04/2008, 0.02
12/05/2008, 0.02
12/08/2008, 0.03
12/09/2008, 0.03
12/10/2008, 0.00 > actually negative
12/11/2008, 0.01
12/12/2008, 0.02
12/15/2008, 0.03
12/16/2008, 0.04
12/17/2008, 0.05
12/18/2008, 0.00 > no.2 low
12/19/2008, 0.02
12/22/2008, 0.01
12/23/2008, 0.02
12/24/2008, 0.00
12/25/2008, ND
12/26/2008, 0.03
12/29/2008, 0.06
12/30/2008, 0.10
12/31/2008, 0.11
01/01/2009, ND
01/02/2009, 0.08
01/05/2009, 0.14
01/06/2009, 0.14
01/07/2009, 0.11
01/08/2009, 0.09
01/09/2009, 0.07
01/12/2009, 0.12
01/13/2009, 0.11
01/14/2009, 0.12
01/15/2009, 0.11
01/16/2009, 0.12
01/19/2009, ND
01/20/2009, 0.13
01/21/2009, 0.11
01/22/2009, 0.10
01/23/2009, 0.11
01/26/2009, 0.14
01/27/2009, 0.13
01/28/2009, 0.19
01/29/2009, 0.23
01/30/2009, 0.24
02/02/2009, 0.27
02/03/2009, 0.32
02/04/2009, 0.30
02/05/2009, 0.29
02/06/2009, 0.28
02/09/2009, 0.32
02/10/2009, 0.31
02/11/2009, 0.30
02/12/2009, 0.29
02/13/2009, 0.29 > getting better
02/16/2009, ND


(In retrospect, the previous low in the 3 month credit auction was in 1929, @0.05)

Compare to:

01/04/1982, 11.87
01/05/1982, 12.20
01/06/1982, 12.16
01/07/1982, 12.17
01/08/1982, 11.98
01/11/1982, 12.49
01/12/1982, 12.52
01/13/1982, 12.70
01/14/1982, 13.17
01/15/1982, 12.74
01/18/1982, 13.41
01/19/1982, 13.13
01/20/1982, 13.51
01/21/1982, 13.65
01/22/1982, 13.63
01/25/1982, 14.06
01/26/1982, 13.65
01/27/1982, 13.40
01/28/1982, 12.84
01/29/1982, 13.08
02/01/1982, 14.77
02/02/1982, 14.49
02/03/1982, 14.64
02/04/1982, 14.38
02/05/1982, 14.63
02/08/1982, 15.04
02/09/1982, 14.91
02/10/1982, 14.88
02/11/1982, 15.06
02/12/1982, ND
02/15/1982, ND
02/16/1982, 15.49
02/17/1982, 15.31 > all time high
02/18/1982, 14.58
02/19/1982, 14.17
02/22/1982, 13.13
02/23/1982, 12.93
02/24/1982, 12.83
02/25/1982, 12.79
02/26/1982, 13.00
03/01/1982, 12.81
03/02/1982, 13.22
03/03/1982, 12.85
03/04/1982, 12.85
03/05/1982, 12.86
03/08/1982, 12.68
03/09/1982, 12.93
03/10/1982, 13.00
03/11/1982, 13.24
03/12/1982, 13.40
03/15/1982, 13.47
03/16/1982, 13.33
03/17/1982, 13.36
03/18/1982, 13.45
03/19/1982, 13.69
03/22/1982, 13.26
03/23/1982, 13.11
03/24/1982, 13.39
03/25/1982, 13.35
03/26/1982, 13.69
03/29/1982, 14.16
03/30/1982, 14.15
03/31/1982, 13.99
04/01/1982, 13.87
04/02/1982, 13.95
04/05/1982, 13.76
04/06/1982, 13.77
04/07/1982, 13.80
04/08/1982, 13.74
04/09/1982, ND
04/12/1982, 13.43
04/13/1982, 13.33
04/14/1982, 13.44
04/15/1982, 13.47
04/16/1982, 13.21
04/19/1982, 13.04
04/20/1982, 13.07
04/21/1982, 12.73
04/22/1982, 12.99
04/23/1982, 12.99
04/26/1982, 13.17
04/27/1982, 13.04
04/28/1982, 13.09
04/29/1982, 13.20
04/30/1982, 13.15
05/03/1982, 13.46
05/04/1982, 13.60
05/05/1982, 13.39
05/06/1982, 13.08
05/07/1982, 13.02
05/10/1982, 13.21
05/11/1982, 12.97
05/12/1982, 13.05
05/13/1982, 13.09
05/14/1982, 12.92
05/17/1982, 13.02
05/18/1982, 12.88
05/19/1982, 12.47
05/20/1982, 12.00
05/21/1982, 11.99
05/24/1982, 11.99
05/25/1982, 12.07
05/26/1982, 12.04
05/27/1982, 12.06
05/28/1982, 11.97
05/31/1982, ND
06/01/1982, 12.55
06/02/1982, 12.69
06/03/1982, 12.63
06/04/1982, 12.78
06/07/1982, 12.71
06/08/1982, 12.79
06/09/1982, 12.62
06/10/1982, 12.52
06/11/1982, 12.55
06/14/1982, 12.88
06/15/1982, 12.93
06/16/1982, 13.03
06/17/1982, 13.15
06/18/1982, 13.31
06/21/1982, 13.11
06/22/1982, 13.37
06/23/1982, 13.67
06/24/1982, 13.60
06/25/1982, 13.87
06/28/1982, 13.81
06/29/1982, 13.80
06/30/1982, 13.36
07/01/1982, 13.14
07/02/1982, 13.36
07/05/1982, ND
07/06/1982, 13.18
07/07/1982, 13.31
07/08/1982, 12.48
07/09/1982, 12.29
07/12/1982, 12.22
07/13/1982, 12.48
07/14/1982, 12.53
07/15/1982, 12.14
07/16/1982, 11.68
07/19/1982, 11.52
07/20/1982, 11.11
07/21/1982, 11.19
07/22/1982, 10.83
07/23/1982, 10.73
07/26/1982, 10.87
07/27/1982, 11.12
07/28/1982, 11.41
07/29/1982, 10.97
07/30/1982, 10.57
08/02/1982, 9.72
08/03/1982, 10.18
08/04/1982, 10.12
08/05/1982, 10.19
08/06/1982, 10.71
08/09/1982, 10.25
08/10/1982, 10.42
08/11/1982, 10.37
08/12/1982, 9.74
08/13/1982, 9.60
08/16/1982, 8.98
08/17/1982, 8.33
08/18/1982, 8.35
08/19/1982, 7.76
08/20/1982, 7.31
08/23/1982, 7.75
08/24/1982, 7.86
08/25/1982, 7.67
08/26/1982, 7.37
08/27/1982, 8.10
08/30/1982, 8.44
08/31/1982, 8.72
09/01/1982, 8.73
09/02/1982, 8.66
09/03/1982, 8.46
09/06/1982, ND
09/07/1982, 8.68
09/08/1982, 8.60
09/09/1982, 8.57
09/10/1982, 8.66
09/13/1982, 8.41
09/14/1982, 8.16
09/15/1982, 8.44
09/16/1982, 8.31
09/17/1982, 8.23
09/20/1982, 8.04
09/21/1982, 7.88
09/22/1982, 7.58
09/23/1982, 7.52
09/24/1982, 7.85
09/27/1982, 7.83
09/28/1982, 7.72
09/29/1982, 7.84
09/30/1982, 7.88
10/01/1982, 7.60
10/04/1982, 8.21
10/05/1982, 8.44
10/06/1982, 8.33
10/07/1982, 8.04
10/08/1982, 8.00

Source
--------------------------------------------------------------------

compare with


----------------------------------------------------------------

Feel free to synthesize the information as you please.
__________________
Be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the present. For in the present is where we shape our future.
Goldenboy219 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-09, 07:09 PM   #539
GIRTH 2.0
Mod team member


 
RightinNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:45 AM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 21,186
Thanks: 2,399
Thanked 8,797 Times in 4,404 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Paul in 2012?

I have no idea what you think any of this proves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
FRB: H.3 Release--Aggregate Reserves of Depository Institutions--February 12, 2009

U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve

compare with:

U.S. Treasury - Daily Treasury Yield Curve

Or any other years of your choice.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE , TCMNOMY30
1977, 7.75
1978, 8.49
1979, 9.28
1980, 11.27
1981, 13.45
1982, 12.76 > 10% unemployment
1983, 11.18
1984, 12.41
1985, 10.79
1986, 7.78
1987, 8.59
1988, 8.96
1989, 8.45
1990, 8.61
1991, 8.14 > 7.3% unemployment
1992, 7.67
1993, 6.59
1994, 7.37
1995, 6.88
1996, 6.71
1997, 6.61
1998, 5.58
1999, 5.87
2000, 5.94 > 3.8% unemployment
2001, 5.49
2002, 5.43
2003, ND
2004, ND
2005, ND
2006, 4.91
2007, 4.84
2008, 4.28 > 7.2% unemployment while yield lows hit 2.8%

Source
So you've proven that this number has absolutely no correlation to unemployment. Okay.
Quote:

3 month treasury:

09/16/2008, 0.84
09/17/2008, 0.03
...
02/11/2009, 0.30
02/12/2009, 0.29
02/13/2009, 0.29 > getting better
02/16/2009, ND


(In retrospect, the previous low in the 3 month credit auction was in 1929, @0.05)
Which proves....?


Quote:
Compare to:

01/04/1982, 11.87
01/05/1982, 12.20
...
10/07/1982, 8.04
10/08/1982, 8.00
So we had a recession when it was high and a recession when it was low. That proves?

Quote:
I have no idea what you think this indicates, given that it's discussing absolute numbers rather than percentages.

Quote:
compare with

Between 8/2000 and 9/2002, the S&P also lost over 50%. Was that another Great Depression?
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
RightinNYC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-09, 09:19 AM   #540
Budtender


 
Goldenboy219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 12:49 PM
Location: Evansville Indiana
Posts: 4,133
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 788 Times in 569 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male
Re: Paul in 2012?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
I have no idea what you think any of this proves.



So you've proven that this number has absolutely no correlation to unemployment. Okay.


Which proves....?



So we had a recession when it was high and a recession when it was low. That proves?


I have no idea what you think this indicates, given that it's discussing absolute numbers rather than percentages.

This is not your "bad" recession of the 50's, 70's, 80's, and 90's lol. Treasury yields illustrate the rational of the investor, and they are scared, otherwise we would not have everything going to 0. Banks are experimenting with quantitative/credit easing strategies that signal the banking system has great deals of insolvency. All without the possibility of a true bank run due to the lush reserves pumped into the system.

And yet, another one of your attempts to paint it as im some sort of crazy lunatic. As stated before, i do not want to convince you of anything. The numbers are there, the US economy has never faced such a scenario as it does now, not even in 1929. Coming from the guy who was telling people to invest in S&P indexes last year, and your failure to acknowledge the significance, i can give two ****s what you think and believe. Rates are at ZERO, and demand for money seems to have reduced its velocity, rendering the Fed ineffective via a liquidity trap (unprecedented in the US).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
From a banking and investment perspective, it is much worse.
Is it not? Simply stating "this doesn't mean anything" is an attempt to dumb down the conversation. It does mean something, otherwise, why do we have TARP, Stimulus, and FOMC credit easing?

Quote:
Between 8/2000 and 9/2002, the S&P also lost over 50%. Was that another Great Depression?
Hey genius, wtf happened between those dates in the city you live?
__________________
Be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the present. For in the present is where we shape our future.
Goldenboy219 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts