Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > US Political Discussion > US Elections



Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-08, 01:43 PM   #71
Professor

 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Last Seen: 02-13-09 03:15 PM
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 41
Thanked 570 Times in 413 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADK_Forever View Post
There is plenty of proof that Bush lied
Lied as in the dictionary definition of lied or lied as in the justification presented for this war were wrong?

Quote:
and I provided you a few articles quoting reputable people, some who worked for Bush, explaining how Bush wanted to invade Iraq even before he took office.
And this demonstrates what?

Please explain why, if Bush wanted to invade Iraq before he took office, Bush then waited until early 2003 to do so? Not only that, but why did Bush then wait nearly 18 months after 9/11 to do so?

Gee, I guess this impulse to implement formal US foreign policy really wasn't all that important.

I mean, if the impulse to invade Iraq was so significant for Bush why bother with Congress and the UN? Why go through all the trouble of fabricating intelligence and doing so in such a way that the intelligence would say exactly what it did pre-Bush? Why go through the trouble of spending most of 2002 making the case for war?

Bush could have just assassinated Hussein. He didn't. He could have order the military to invade without congressional authority. He didn't. He could have gotten congressional authority and then invaded without appealing to the UN to pass the 16th, yes, the 16th resolution to gain Iraqi compliance. He didn't.

So, um, this impulse to invade Iraq before taking office...really quite f'ing irrelevant.

Try again.
JMak is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-08, 04:47 PM   #72
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Last Seen: 12-18-08 11:21 PM
Posts: 101
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMak View Post
Lied as in the dictionary definition of lied or lied as in the justification presented for this war were wrong?



And this demonstrates what?

Please explain why, if Bush wanted to invade Iraq before he took office, Bush then waited until early 2003 to do so? Not only that, but why did Bush then wait nearly 18 months after 9/11 to do so?

Gee, I guess this impulse to implement formal US foreign policy really wasn't all that important.

I mean, if the impulse to invade Iraq was so significant for Bush why bother with Congress and the UN? Why go through all the trouble of fabricating intelligence and doing so in such a way that the intelligence would say exactly what it did pre-Bush? Why go through the trouble of spending most of 2002 making the case for war?

Bush could have just assassinated Hussein. He didn't. He could have order the military to invade without congressional authority. He didn't. He could have gotten congressional authority and then invaded without appealing to the UN to pass the 16th, yes, the 16th resolution to gain Iraqi compliance. He didn't.

So, um, this impulse to invade Iraq before taking office...really quite f'ing irrelevant.

Try again.
I was under the impression that the official United States stance is that we do not assassinate. I thought that we actually condemned the policy of "targeted killing" or assassination used by Israel. Also, such use of force, at least the way it has been used, would have been a massive constitutional stretch.

Congress is expressly given the power "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water"

Its pretty obvious that the framers intent was not to give the President authority to send troops into a foreign country, collapse their government, and attempt to create a new one over the course of 7 years without Congressional approval.
BlueKC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-08, 08:04 PM   #73
Rockin' In The Free World

 
the makeout hobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 07:40 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 5,779
Thanks: 1,143
Thanked 1,077 Times in 730 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
Appologizes for being insulting, wasn't the point. It was meant to ask the question. You asked it of me, yet none of the people making similar statements that I was responding to. So I was wondering why. I was asking why you were choosing to ask me this but didn't ask them. I thank you for answering the question but if you were insulted by it, my apologizes. Nothing I said was accusational, it was questioning.



This was perhaps bad explanation on my point by the looks of it.

What I was saying is that someone that wins outside of the point I said was "Landslide" worthy, imho, simply "won". This encompasses "big wins" like Obama's, or "squeekers" like the 2000 race. If pressed to say whether those were either "wins" or "Landslide wins", I'd say they were both "wins".



This was kind of what I was meaning to say. Essentially if putting it in two categories there'd be win, and landslide win. Obama's would fall in the former. However it was a solid win, not a "squeeker", but in no way was it a "landslide".

Got it, thanks. Sorry for any misunderstanding.
__________________
The Makeout Hobo is real, and does indeed travel around the country in his van and make out with ladies... If you meet the Makeout Hobo, it is customary to greet him with a shot of whiskey and a high five (if you are a dude) or passionate makeouts (if you are a lady).
the makeout hobo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-08, 08:33 PM   #74
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Seen: 04-24-09 06:26 AM
Posts: 964
Thanks: 1
Thanked 69 Times in 63 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by the makeout hobo View Post
During the presidential campaign, Governor Sarah Palin made many comments about parts of America being "pro-America parts of America", and about there being "real Americans". We saw how badly Obama was bludgeoned with his "bitter comments." What do you think the chances are of these quotes coming back and haunting Palin in 2012 when she runs for president? I can see how these quotes can be taken to be very insulting to urban Americans, and to people who aren't conservatives.
Something that is amazing and abused by politicians is the extraordinary amnesia of the masses. If she wants to run for president or VP whatever she says today won't overcome her new words four years from now.
conquer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-08, 12:17 PM   #75
Professor

 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Last Seen: 02-13-09 03:15 PM
Posts: 1,942
Thanks: 41
Thanked 570 Times in 413 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueKC View Post
I was under the impression that the official United States stance is that we do not assassinate. I thought that we actually condemned the policy of "targeted killing" or assassination used by Israel. Also, such use of force, at least the way it has been used, would have been a massive constitutional stretch.
I don't know. That doesn't mean that there are not exceptions to US policy. My understanding is that the President may order such an assassination but only after informing congressional leaders.

Quote:
Congress is expressly given the power "To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water"
So?

Our recent national history sees a very clear shift from formal declarations of was to Congress granting the President the authority to utilize the nation's armed forces. It's still a legislative check on executive authority which is what the declaration clause was intended to be.

Quote:
Its pretty obvious that the framers intent was not to give the President authority to send troops into a foreign country, collapse their government, and attempt to create a new one over the course of 7 years without Congressional approval.
However, in this case, the Congress did grant the President this authority.

Or are you one of these types that argues that a resolution granting the President the authority to use military force really didn't intend the use of military force?
JMak is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-08, 12:27 PM   #76
Sage


 
winston53660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 06:10 PM
Posts: 9,033
Thanks: 674
Thanked 2,241 Times in 1,602 Posts
Re: Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMak View Post
I don't know. That doesn't mean that there are not exceptions to US policy. My understanding is that the President may order such an assassination but only after informing congressional leaders.



?
Since 1976, every U.S. president has upheld Ford's prohibition on assassinations. In 1978 President Carter issued an executive order with the chief purpose of reshaping the intelligence structure. In Section 2-305 of that order, Carter reaffirmed the U.S. prohibition on assassination.

CNN.com - U.S. policy on assassinations - Nov. 4, 2002
__________________
http://winstoncreative.com/
winston53660 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to winston53660 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-elections/41066-palins-words-come-back-haunt-her.html
Posted By For Type Date
Sarah Palin On Best Political Blogs » Blog Archive » Will Palin's Words Come Back To Haunt Her? - Debate Politics Forums This thread Pingback 12-11-08 12:57 PM
Sarah Palin On Best Political Blogs » Blog Archive » Will Palin’s Words Come Back To Haunt Her? This thread Pingback 12-11-08 01:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts