• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The OFFICIAL 2008 Election Vote Irregularities Thread

At this time, there are 64,671 calls to the CNN vote irregularities hotline. Out of this number, 27,214 are calls to complain. Virginia is having the highest rate of complaints, with 211 complaints per million votes, which is not too bad.

So far, things are going fairly smoothly, except if you are one of those who ended up filing a complaint.
 
Re: Hillary Clinton Politicing 5 feet from polling location

Thanks. I was disappointed Clinton didn't win the nomination, she along with Bill was the most eligible candidate to run the country, and particularly with the current economic mess the second Bush left, like father like son. Oh well.
I voted for Clinton in the primary, partly for the reason you stated, but also, I hoped to see the primary prolonged to get a better look at Obama. Either way, I'm content...:)



*Heh...heh, it would have been sweet irony to have a Clinton clean up after both Bushs.
 
Re: Hillary Clinton Politicing 5 feet from polling location

*Heh...heh, it would have been sweet irony to have a Clinton clean up after both Bushs.

I dunno. 20 years of Bush's and Clinton's is enough for me
 
Still amazes me that this kind of childish behaviour happens anywhere frankly.. and it is sad.
 

Turns out they were against Obama, not McCain. Like the girl who got "mugged" my an Obama supporter, it seemed fishy. As the area was a heavy democratic area, it wouldn't make sense to intimidate McCain voters there.

Wrong again Drudge and Fox, your a credit to journalism.

Ben Smith's Blog: Panther vs. Obama - Politico.com

"[Obama] is a puppet on a string. I don't support no black man running for white politics. I will not vote for who will be the next slavemaster," he told the Philadelphia Daily News a few days ago, one of the least crazy things he said amid some straightforwardly racist riffs.
 
Last edited:
Turns out they were against Obama, not McCain. Like the girl who got "mugged" my an Obama supporter, it seemed fishy. As the area was a heavy democratic area, it wouldn't make sense to intimidate McCain voters there.

Wrong again Drudge and Fox, your a credit to journalism.

Ben Smith's Blog: Panther vs. Obama - Politico.com

So a reader of Ben Smith's blog claims that one of the guys standing at the polls supposedly said something about how Obama is a bad guy a while ago.

1) Do we know that's the guy?
2) What about the other guy with him, the one who was a Democratic Poll Observer
3) It's a heavily democratic area, yea - does that mean there are no McCain voters there? The guy taking the video obviously was, and there were Republican poll watchers there so there's obviously a reason.

And what about the reporting of this story is such a "discredit"? They reported that there were two black panthers standing at the doors of a polling place with billyclubs. That's accurate.
 
Ohio GOP files suit over provisional ballots
 
In case you're wondering why the Repubs didn't flip this one: the guy who flips the votes for the Republicans was in court on election day.

So America now has its first elected president of the 21st century.

The man who has been instrumental in stealing elections for the Republicans is named Mike Connell. Mark Crispin Miller gives us the scoop, on Democracy Now:

Mike Connell is—has been named as Karl Rove’s computer guru since 2000. The lawyers in the case refer to Connell as a high-IQ Forrest Gump, because he’s been on the scene of every dubious election we’ve had over the last eight years, starting with Florida 2000.

Now, he has been named by a man named Stephen Spoonamore, S-P-O-O-N-A-M-O-R-E, who’s a very unusual and particularly unimpeachable kind of whistleblower. He’s a conservative Republican; he’s a former McCain supporter. But above all, he is a renowned and highly successful expert at the detection of computer fraud. He works for big banks. He works for foreign governments, the Secret Service. His job is to figure out how computers are used to steal money or information or votes. Well, he’s named a lot of people in the Bush-Cheney election subversion conspiracy. He has worked with them. He knows them personally. And months ago, he named Mike Connell and his company GovTech Solutions as having played a crucial role in the...electronic subversion of the vote in Ohio in 2004. And Spoonamore has actually described the computer architecture that was used to do this.

Now, on the strength of this testimony, the lawyers in the case had the judge issue a subpoena to Mike Connell last week. Connell defied the subpoena; he was in contempt. Late last week, the lawyers filed a motion to compel compliance, and to everyone’s surprise and delight, the judge ordered Connell to appear today and to be deposed for two hours about his role in this longstanding electronic plot...to flip votes towards the Republicans.
Democracy Now! | On Eve of Election Day, Is the Nation's Voting System Ready? Reports of Irregularities Pour in from Across US in Record Early Voting
 
Last edited:
Vote-flipping caught on video:

digg / video display

Note to Republican hackers: when you program the machines to flip votes to Republicans, be sure to remove the routine that displays the flip. :2razz:
 
Vote-flipping caught on video:

digg / video display

Note to Republican hackers: when you program the machines to flip votes to Republicans, be sure to remove the routine that displays the flip. :2razz:

Your own link shows that this is a machine that is out of calibration, not one that has a routine to flip votes. In fact, in your own link, the last mistake the machine is making is flipping a straight Republican ticket choice to Ralph Nader. If this is a conspiracy to steal an election, the conspirators have to be pretty retarded if the machine is taking votes away from THEIR candidate.
 
Our ballots need more fiber.
 
The Republican War on Voting

Using the Department of Justice, friendly governors, and its usual propaganda outlets, the GOP has propagated the myth of voter fraud to purge the rolls of non-Republicans.

Sharrard's cautionary tone was a response to the Republican Party's ongoing nationwide campaign to suppress the low-income minority vote by propagating the myth of voter fraud. Using various tactics -- including media smears, bogus lawsuits, restrictive new voting laws and policies, and flimsy prosecutions -- Republican operatives, election officials, and the GOP-controlled Justice Department have limited voting access and gone after voter-registration groups such as ACORN. Which should come as no surprise: In building support for initiatives raising the minimum wage and kindred ballot measures, ACORN has registered, in partnership with Project Vote, 1.6 million largely Democratic-leaning voters since 2004. All told, non-profit groups registered over three million new voters in 2004, about the same time that Republican and Justice Department efforts to publicize ?voter fraud? and limit voting access became more widespread. And attacking ACORN has been a central element of a systematic GOP disenfranchisement agenda to undermine Democratic prospects before each Election Day.

Revelations that U.S. attorneys were fired for their failure to successfully prosecute voter fraud have revealed how fictitious the allegations of widespread fraud actually were -- but the allegations haven't gone away. They live on in all the vote-suppressing laws and regulations that will likely affect this year's election, in GOP rhetoric and, most recently, in the arguments presented by champions of Indiana's restrictive voter-identification law in a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Republican War on Voting | The American Prospect

Tip for Repubs: when you have to suppress the vote to get into office, your party is dead. :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
Alternate title: The Sore Losers' Thread

I find it touching that that Republicans are getting interested in election fraud--now that it's not working for them anymore. This will help them understand how we Democrats have felt for the last eight years. ;)

The Brag Blog is one of the best sites tracking the ongoing treason of the Republican Party against the American people. Here's the latest:

The election results being reported in Alaska still stink from top to bottom. While it may be true that fewer voters turned out to vote for Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Barack Obama on this year's Presidential tickets than turned out to vote for Bush and Kerry in 2004 --- even with Alaska's record increases in voter registration and voter participation during their primaries and unprecedented turnout during early voting --- it does strain credulity, as noted by Anchorage's Shannyn Moore, by poll analysist/expert Nate Silver and others.

There could be some reasonable explanation for poll-shattering upset victories by Republicans in Alaska's U.S. House and Senate contests, despite pre-election polls predicting near-certain defeat for convicted 7-time felon Sen. Ted Stevens and Rep. Don Young, who is currently under FBI investigation on corruption charges.
The BRAD BLOG
 
Last edited:
I apologize for posting several times in a row, but I found another interesting story.

I'm thankful for this thread. Americans need to know the Republican Party has been actively at war with democracy for some time.

Mark Crispin Miller, author of the important book Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Elections, is another important source:

Signs of FRAUD in Minnesota race

Evidence of Republican Election Fraud in the Al Franken, Norm Coleman Senate Race?
by E. Nelson

When McCain said he was confident that he would win with a surge in the wee hours of November 5th during the final counting was there more truth in this statement than he was letting on? Two weeks ago, former Bush operative Karl Rove was confidently saying that John McCain could win ten battleground states to become President. Monday, the day before the election, Republican IT specialist Mike Connell, a Karl Rove protégé, was forced to testify in front of a Cleveland federal judge about a number of serious allegations with regards to hijacking vote results in Ohio during the 2004 presidential election. Interestingly, Karl Rove changed his tune after the testimony and said on the eve of the election that Barack Obama would win in a landslide.

Could cyber-attacks and manipulation of transmitted vote tallies still have occurred in Minnesota - like what was described in Mike Connell’s testimony the day before - altering vote tallies in the Presidential and Senate elections as they were tabulated throughout the early morning hours of November 5th?
News From Underground: Signs of FRAUD in Minnesota race
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom