Palin's record.

jfuh · 09-05-08, 08:44 PM

So there've been lots of "baseless" accusations on who Palin is and isn't as of late. Well no wonder, because for the most part, except for Alaskans most America has no idea who she is and there's been no national coverage.
So some follow up on the stories from Anchorage daily News.

Book censorship
Here's the story about Palin's book-banning try as mayor: National Politics | adn.com

On troopergate
Palin's stall: Opinion | adn.com

Bridge to no where
McClatchy Washington Bureau | 09/04/2008 | Palin was for earmarks before she was against them

On being the commander and chief of the Alaska national gaurd - not a single decision - even though the campaign says any decision she's ever made involving the guard is still more than what obama has ever done - riiiight.
Official: Palin's never issued an order to Alaska Guard: National Politics | adn.com

Lerxst · 09-05-08, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfuh

So there've been lots of "baseless" accusations on who Palin is and isn't as of late. Well no wonder, because for the most part, except for Alaskans most America has no idea who she is and there's been no national coverage.
So some follow up on the stories from Anchorage daily News.

Book censorship
Here's the story about Palin's book-banning try as mayor: National Politics | adn.com

On troopergate
Palin's stall: Opinion | adn.com

Bridge to no where
McClatchy Washington Bureau | 09/04/2008 | Palin was for earmarks before she was against them

On being the commander and chief of the Alaska national gaurd - not a single decision - even though the campaign says any decision she's ever made involving the guard is still more than what obama has ever done - riiiight.
Official: Palin's never issued an order to Alaska Guard: National Politics | adn.com

Oh jfuh...you are just being petty now!

Zyphlin · 09-05-08, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfuh

So there've been lots of "baseless" accusations on who Palin is and isn't as of late. Well no wonder, because for the most part, except for Alaskans most America has no idea who she is and there's been no national coverage.
So some follow up on the stories from Anchorage daily News.

Book censorship
Here's the story about Palin's book-banning try as mayor: National Politics | adn.com

On troopergate
Palin's stall: Opinion | adn.com

Bridge to no where
McClatchy Washington Bureau | 09/04/2008 | Palin was for earmarks before she was against them

On being the commander and chief of the Alaska national gaurd - not a single decision - even though the campaign says any decision she's ever made involving the guard is still more than what obama has ever done - riiiight.
Official: Palin's never issued an order to Alaska Guard: National Politics | adn.com

What exactly is your point here? To come in and make a thread consolidating them all so you can have yet another thread on it to do the typical tactic that both sides use of "if I say something enough it'll be thought of as truth no matter what".

There's threads detailing all four of these things, if not multiple threads, ALL throughout the forum. Threads where both sides of the issues have been, and are being, discussed and debated. And instead of dealing in any of those you seek to make another thread to attack, one that doesn't deal with any of the counter points mentioned in all the other threads.

Why?

DeeJayH · 09-05-08, 11:25 PM

Lerxst · 09-05-08, 11:33 PM

Oh sweet mother of god...that is just so wrong Deej!!!

DeeJayH · 09-05-08, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lerxst

Oh sweet mother of god...that is just so wrong Deej!!!

sad thing is, it is straight off the set and does not, atleast to me, appear to be doctored

Just say no to Teletubbies

jfuh · 09-06-08, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zyphlin

What exactly is your point here? To come in and make a thread consolidating them all so you can have yet another thread on it to do the typical tactic that both sides use of "if I say something enough it'll be thought of as truth no matter what".

There's threads detailing all four of these things, if not multiple threads, ALL throughout the forum. Threads where both sides of the issues have been, and are being, discussed and debated. And instead of dealing in any of those you seek to make another thread to attack, one that doesn't deal with any of the counter points mentioned in all the other threads.

Why?

Because they're all related to the exact same issue at heart, who is Palin? Do you really know palin?
I looked around the forum, and asside from bridge to no where and troopergate being cited I could not find any other thread that had a credible citation of the book censorship or the commander in chief of the alaskan national gaurd cited. Hence why I made another thread with these all cited.

Now you can play the - you're just calling it multiple times till it sticks routine and not actually respond and continue to question my motives to discredit me, but I certainly didn't create this thread so as to have it be a discussion about me.
The very first paragraph I answered exactly why this thread was created.

Indy · 09-06-08, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfuh

Because they're all related to the exact same issue at heart, who is Palin? Do you really know palin?
I looked around the forum, and asside from bridge to no where and troopergate being cited I could not find any other thread that had a credible citation of the book censorship or the commander in chief of the alaskan national gaurd cited. Hence why I made another thread with these all cited.

Now you can play the - you're just calling it multiple times till it sticks routine and not actually respond and continue to question my motives to discredit me, but I certainly didn't create this thread so as to have it be a discussion about me.
The very first paragraph I answered exactly why this thread was created.

Reverend_hellhou, oh I'm sorry, Jfuh please please please for the love of god please STOP FLOODING THE FORUM WITH THESE THREADS! If a new issue comes up, great post a new thread. But come on man, how many of these things are we going to have to see?