| US Elections McWho?; My oh my, what a difference a week makes.
This time last Friday the media was still basking in the ... |
09-05-08, 01:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Jul 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:04 PM
Posts: 123
Thanks: 13
Thanked 122 Times in 56 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender: 
Current Mood: | McWho? My oh my, what a difference a week makes.
This time last Friday the media was still basking in the afterglow of Senator Barack Obama’s acceptance speech of the Democratic presidential nomination at Invesco Field in Denver. Epitomized by Keith Olbermann’s proverbial post-coitus bedazzled sigh of fulfillment, little time was left to focus on who John McCain might be announcing as his running mate at noon. Beyond Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty and former Massachusetts Governor-cum-McCain rival Mitt Romney, the media was too busy drinking the dregs of the Obama Kool-Aid to give serious consideration to any other potential contenders for the second slot on the Republican ticket.
What difference would it make any way?
Having chosen the Delaware Destroyer as his running mate, Obama had guaranteed McCain’s selection would be little more than a sacrificial lamb before the unrelenting and legendary onslaught of Democratic street brawler Joe Biden.
For all intents and purposes, the race was over. It was merely a matter of going through the motions; running out the clock till November 4th and picking carpet and drapery swatches for Michelle to choose from.
And then at noon in Dayton, Ohio, everything changed.
John McCain introduced Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate.
In doing so, not only did he usher Palin into the history books as the Republican Party’s first female vice presidential nominee, but he also changed the electoral game.
How? With one decision McCain put the Republicans back in the game.
Senator Obama and the Democrats had scored a series of home runs at their convention last week and had been pitching a shutout; till noon last Friday, that is.
A mere week since its announcement, McCain’s choice of Palin is increasingly coming to be seen as a strategic masterstroke. In one fell swoop, McCain solidified the Republican base and reestablished his bona fides as an independent-minded maverick. Having unified the conservative base with her selection, Palin then proceeded to electrify it with her magnetic personality; brilliant smile and gleeful combativeness.
Pouncing on confirmation of the pregnancy of Palin’s unwed 17 year-old daughter, Bristol, the media and liberal bloggers believed they had found a weapon with which to assault the neophyte to the national scene. Instead of wounding the photogenic former beauty queen, her detractors saw their attacks blow up in their face as they rallied the Republican faithful to her side and engendered cries of hypocrisy and sexism from Middle American.
In the process, the media managed to create such a buzz around Palin that more viewers watched her address to the Republican National Convention than did the 38+ million that watched Obama’s historic acceptance address the previous Thursday. Having surpassed Obama with her 40+ million viewers, she easily left his running mate – Joe Biden – in the dust with a comparatively meager 24 million tuning in to watch his acceptance address the night before Obama’s.
Admittedly some of Palin’s stellar ratings are attributable to old-fashioned curiosity about an unknown commodity. However, in their rush to burn her at the stake, her opponents created a sympathetic backlash; a spirited and impassioned defense by the Republican base and an irresistible interest in the American public to see who this woman that had created the political equivalent of a tactical nuclear detonation in the presidential race.
With her ratings eclipsing viewership of the Academy Awards, the opening ceremonies of the Beijing Olympics and the finals of American Idol, it is clear McCain’s running mate has revived interest in what was heretofore a lackluster, sleep-inducing campaign.
Though many in the media and the Democratic Party dismiss both Palin’s selection and its potential impact, there are mounting indicators that in addition to electrifying the Republican base it has also inspired fear in many; including high profile Obama supporter Oprah Winfrey.
Following in the wake of Palin’s introduction and magnetic performance Wednesday evening, the Obama campaign announced it had collected $10 million in campaign contributions in the days following McCain’s announcement. Clearly Palin’s addition to the McCain ticket has created a disturbance in the Force in the minds of Obama supporters. For confirmation, one need look no further than reports of a rift within Oprah Winfrey’s production staff over whether or not to invite Governor Palin to appear on the media mogul’s show.
With Winfrey being both a public and ardent supporter of the Democratic presidential nominee, she and key members of her staff are hesitant to do anything that could potentially hinder his pursuit of the Oval Office. Clearly what Winfrey and her staff fears is the hockey mom of five-cum-political phenom connecting with her audience of millions that she had hoped to shepherd to the ballot box for Senator Obama. With her website being deluged by requests for a Palin appearance and a proported leak of the internal strife surfacing at The Drudge Report, Oprah has issued a denial in which she states, ".....I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over."
While Palin’s selection is the political equivalent of raising Lazarus from the dead and is a masterstroke for the McCain campaign, as her star continues its brilliant ascent it leaves many bedazzled observers asking, “McWho?”
Perhaps Robert Palmer summed it up best, faithful readers. She’s simply irresistible. Stay tuned for further updates as events warrant and the Republican faithful begin singing “Addicted To Love”. |
| | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to The Bare Knuckled Pundit For This Useful Post: | |
09-05-08, 02:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Focus like a laser beam
Join Date: Dec 2007 Last Online: Today 03:30 AM Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,202
Thanks: 843
Thanked 878 Times in 539 Posts
Lean: Moderate Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Somebody with more skillz than me needs to make a video with Sarah in it with this song. YouTube - Robert Palmer - Simply Irresistible
__________________ The heart of human intelligence is pattern recognition ~ Ray Kurzweill |
| |
09-05-08, 02:41 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Jul 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:04 PM
Posts: 123
Thanks: 13
Thanked 122 Times in 56 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by MC.no.spin Somebody with more skillz than me needs to make a video with Sarah in it with this song. YouTube - Robert Palmer - Simply Irresistible |
Indeed! Now if they could only get her to wear that iconic dress Palmer's models wore...... |
| |
09-05-08, 02:49 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Make the stupidness stop
Mod team member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: Yesterday 10:24 PM Location: Herndon, Va
Posts: 4,916
Thanks: 1,776
Thanked 1,914 Times in 1,145 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  Awards: | Re: McWho? Another great post. I think what I like about you is you can write about either candidate and make it seem like you're on board with them, excited about them, but also realistic. You could take one of your pro obama pieces and say you're an Obama supporter, and take one of your Palin pieces and say you're on that ticket. When added all together, you have someone that is very good at extracting themself from the situation and trying to take an objective look at the benefits of both.
__________________ Obama Wins. Time to reach for the new American Dream: "Strive for Mediocrity, avoid success, get free crap" |
| |
09-05-08, 08:59 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Jul 2008 Last Online: Yesterday 11:04 PM
Posts: 123
Thanks: 13
Thanked 122 Times in 56 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphlin Another great post. I think what I like about you is you can write about either candidate and make it seem like you're on board with them, excited about them, but also realistic. You could take one of your pro obama pieces and say you're an Obama supporter, and take one of your Palin pieces and say you're on that ticket. When added all together, you have someone that is very good at extracting themself from the situation and trying to take an objective look at the benefits of both. |
Thanks, Zyph! I can't tell you how much I appreciate that and what a compliment I consider it be. I am truly honored.
There is more than enough partisan spin and vitriol out there to sate anyone's spleen. Accordingly, I don't see any need to add fuel to the fire.
I'll be the first one to admit, every now and then I get carried away and my passions get the best of me. However, I try to remain as objective, civil and conversational as possible.
Part of the problem we have today is we're often so enraged or engrossed in an issue or politician that we end up yelling past each other. The only thing that accomplishes is raising both blood pressures and the overall cacophony. So, I try to do my little part to bring the volume and the tone down when and where I can.
I grew up in the Game and one of the things my Pa Pa (that's West Virginian for grandfather) told me was no matter how hard you campaign, how much you fight or how nasty a race gets, your opponent is still human in the end. They have a family, a heart, feelings, people they love and that love them. They may be your enemy, if only for the duration of a campaign, but someone found something positive in them.
So, I try to look for the positive in those who offer their throats to the snarling teeth of the electorate whenever I can. Sometimes it's admittedly hard, but I try nonetheless.
It's funny, though, that you mention I could be taken for an Obama supporter one day and a Palin fan the next. I often get labeled as a Democratic Kool-Aid peddler as well as a Republican propagandist. I've alternately been accused of being an Obama campaign plant and a McCain camp agent provocateur.
So, as an old political columnist once told me, if you're pissin' 'em off on both sides of the aisle, you must be doing something right.
Thanks again. |
| |
09-05-08, 09:07 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Liberal elite guy
Join Date: Apr 2007 Last Online: Today 02:44 AM Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,910
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,552 Times in 1,005 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Wow...with one fail swoop John McCain has put the Republican Party back in the game? What? With one fail swoop John McCain has completely negated the GOP case against Barrack Obama, by nominating a woman with less comparable experience than the man they are trying to beat down.
__________________ I was so right. And you? Well you were so wrong. You lost. Ha. Ha. |
| |
09-05-08, 09:14 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Distillate of Mjolnir
Join Date: Oct 2007 Last Online: Today 02:03 AM
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 233
Thanked 320 Times in 225 Posts
Gender:  | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by Lerxst Wow...with one fail swoop John McCain has put the Republican Party back in the game? What? With one fail swoop John McCain has completely negated the GOP case against Barrack Obama, by nominating a woman with less comparable experience than the man they are trying to beat down. | I guess in a speculative sense, yes? Time shall tell.
If I were to go by the predictions that you and Soutrhern Democrat made, the RNC was going to be an unwatched debalce. Which of course you have assured us all of. Meanwhile in the real world Palin drew slightly less veiwers than Obama, McCain drew more than Obama and the theory that there will be "no poll bump" following the RNC has been put to bed.
Oh yes, this just in: Republican convention was most-watched convention on television -- ever...
At this point I'd think just for the sake of appearing rational (and I only mean appear rational) you'd dial back your rhetoric.
__________________ I hate to break this to you but there is no big lie. There is no system, the universe is indifferent. |
| | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sir Loin For This Useful Post: | |
09-05-08, 09:35 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Make the stupidness stop
Mod team member
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: Yesterday 10:24 PM Location: Herndon, Va
Posts: 4,916
Thanks: 1,776
Thanked 1,914 Times in 1,145 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  Awards: | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by Lerxst Wow...with one fail swoop John McCain has put the Republican Party back in the game? What? With one fail swoop John McCain has completely negated the GOP case against Barrack Obama, by nominating a woman with less comparable experience than the man they are trying to beat down. | What do you mean by "comparable experience". |
| |
09-05-08, 09:46 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Liberal elite guy
Join Date: Apr 2007 Last Online: Today 02:44 AM Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,910
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,552 Times in 1,005 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphlin What do you mean by "comparable experience". | I mean experience...not just carrying a title. Educational experience, work experience in government. |
| |
09-05-08, 09:58 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Liberal elite guy
Join Date: Apr 2007 Last Online: Today 02:44 AM Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,910
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,552 Times in 1,005 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: McWho? Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Loin
I guess in a speculative sense, yes? Time shall tell.
If I were to go by the predictions that you and Soutrhern Democrat made, the RNC was going to be an unwatched debalce. Which of course you have assured us all of. Meanwhile in the real world Palin drew slightly less veiwers than Obama, McCain drew more than Obama and the theory that there will be "no poll bump" following the RNC has been put to bed.
Oh yes, this just in: Republican convention was most-watched convention on television -- ever...
At this point I'd think just for the sake of appearing rational (and I only mean appear rational) you'd dial back your rhetoric. | Let's see what Fox News had to say... Quote:
Nielsen said that 38.9 million people watched McCain accept the GOP nomination Thursday on either ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News Channel or MSNBC. PBS, which has a more imprecise estimate based on samples in a few big cities, said 3.5 million watched on its network.
Last week, Obama’s speech in Denver was seen by 38.4 million on 10 different commercial networks, and an additional 4 million on PBS. Add it up, and that’s McCain, 42.4 million, to Obama, 42.4 million. No one can really tell who truly had the biggest audience, since C-SPAN also showed the speeches, and Nielsen doesn’t measure the cable channel’s viewers. But if the presidential vote is this close on Nov. 4, it will be a long night.
| Well I'll let you ride your tide, as short lived as it is sure to be, and dial back nothing. The hype over the viewing numbers is just that...hype. McCain's lead isn't actually a lead. It's more of a tie. What does it actually translate to? Let's see the bump on Monday or Tuesday. At this point there is nothing saying they got much of anything out of the RNC. I'll eat crow next week if this thing actually takes off and ends up making any difference.
Take your direct insults against me to the Basement please. Thanks.
Last edited by Lerxst : 09-05-08 at 09:59 PM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-elections/35739-mcwho.html | | Posted By | For | Type | Date | | McWho? (://URLFAN) | This thread | Refback | 09-05-08 10:43 PM | | |