Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > United States only > US Elections

US Elections Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'; Palin has stated this: PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-04-08, 04:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Aiming Anti-Stupid Gun
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Last Online: Yesterday 07:35 PM
Location: Land of the Anti-Stupid
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 74
Thanked 581 Times in 408 Posts

Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Palin has stated this:

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."

The problem is that Obama passed legislation to stop shipments of WMD. Esteemed Senator Lugar has spent much of his career trying to destroy and stop these weapons. By calling Obama's weapons control WMD "minor" it does stand to reason that Palin also considers her fellow republican's legislation to secure this country and the world to be "minor."

I got a real problem with someone who thinks that intercepting, destroying and overall reducing WMDs is "minor."
__________________
"Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them" - Jeffery Sinclair
obvious Child is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to obvious Child For This Useful Post:
Inline Ads
Old 09-04-08, 05:40 AM   #2 (permalink)
Guru

 
PeteEU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 03:31 PM
Location: Mijas, Costa del Sol
Posts: 3,131
Thanks: 83
Thanked 503 Times in 375 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Torn
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
Palin has stated this:

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."

The problem is that Obama passed legislation to stop shipments of WMD. Esteemed Senator Lugar has spent much of his career trying to destroy and stop these weapons. By calling Obama's weapons control WMD "minor" it does stand to reason that Palin also considers her fellow republican's legislation to secure this country and the world to be "minor."

I got a real problem with someone who thinks that intercepting, destroying and overall reducing WMDs is "minor."
Shhh dont ruin the Republicans high by stating factual and obvious things like this.

Then again Palin is against the US, so spreading nukes to the US and wests enemies will only promote Alaska's independence after all.
__________________
PeteEU
PeteEU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 09:29 AM   #3 (permalink)
Constitutionalist


 
American's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 09:46 PM
Location: VA
Posts: 3,638
Thanks: 424
Thanked 699 Times in 504 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Amused
Thumbs down Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
Palin has stated this:

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."

The problem is that Obama passed legislation to stop shipments of WMD. Esteemed Senator Lugar has spent much of his career trying to destroy and stop these weapons. By calling Obama's weapons control WMD "minor" it does stand to reason that Palin also considers her fellow republican's legislation to secure this country and the world to be "minor."

I got a real problem with someone who thinks that intercepting, destroying and overall reducing WMDs is "minor."
OMG, BORING!!!
__________________
It's Obama's fault!
American is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 09:58 AM   #4 (permalink)
1.20.13



 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 10:30 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,671
Thanks: 1,049
Thanked 1,806 Times in 1,316 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'




this is too funny.... can we make a further stretch?
__________________
كافر
Never forget those who died.
Never forget those who killed them.
Reverend_Hellh0und is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 10:01 AM   #5 (permalink)
Intellectual Barbarian

 
rathi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 10:19 PM
Location: California
Posts: 1,928
Thanks: 25
Thanked 495 Times in 314 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cool
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

I can't believe Palin would attack Lugar just to get at Obama. Lugar's work against weapons proliferation has been both committed and effective. The Nunn-Lugar bill has deactived thousands of wmds since its conception. I hope Lugar stands up for himself and tells her that some governor from Alaska with no experience in weapons proliferation at all better have some damn good evidence if she wants call his bill un-important.

The Obama Lugar bill was primarily to designed to stop the proliferation of conventional arms that could be dangerous to our nation if used in terrorist attacks. Many of our problems in Iraq ,for example, stem from the large pile of artillery shells used to make IEDs. Similarly, the shoulder fired missiles like those the Afghani's used against the soviets could easily kill hundreds if you used against passenger airliners. The bill also works to give aid to other nation to reduce the proliferation of wmds, which is crucial considering that most the dangerous nuclear weapons reside in areas beyond our control. This bill works to protect our troops in Iraq, and to prevent terrorists from getting the weapons to attack us at home.

From, what I have seen about Palin, I'd challenge anyone to show me something she did that is more important than this.
__________________
He'd be right at home on some ancient battlefield, swinging an axe into somebody's face.
rathi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rathi For This Useful Post:
Old 09-04-08, 10:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Student
 
Gabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Last Online: 11-29-08 11:12 AM
Posts: 280
Thanks: 157
Thanked 114 Times in 81 Posts
Lean: Conservative

Current Mood:
Twisted
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Are you talking about this bill?

Sen. Barack Obama claims in a new campaign ad to have “reached out” to Republicans in Congress to launch a major new program to “lock down loose nuclear weapons,” when in fact the legislation he helped pass authorized the Bush administration to maintain and expand an initiative pioneered by John Bolton to help foreign countries stop shipments of weapons of mass destruction components from reaching rogue states such as Iran.


In the campaign ad, titled “America’s Leadership,” the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee says, “The single most important national security threat we face is the threat of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. What I did was reach out to Senator Dick Lugar, Republican, to help lock down loose nuclear weapons.”


An on-screen caption provides the details. “On the Foreign Relations Committee, Obama Passed a Law . . . To Keep Nuclear Weapons Out Of Terrorists’ Hands.”


However, the bill mentioned in the ad — Public Law 109-472, signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 11, 2007 — was introduced by Lugar in late September 2006 without co-sponsors and not as a result of Lugar’s discussions with Obama and was voted out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without a hearing.


Newsmax.com - Ad Exaggerates Obama&#39s Credentials
Gabby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 10:14 AM   #7 (permalink)
Young Money Millionaire


 
Hatuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 04:41 PM
Posts: 13,184
Thanks: 2,828
Thanked 3,141 Times in 1,999 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sunshine
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabby View Post
Are you talking about this bill?

Newsmax.com - Ad Exaggerates Obama's Credentials
Why are you citing a blog like Newsmax? It's the righ wing equivalent of infohouse

PolitiFact | We found a few things

Quote:
Originally Posted by Politifact
In the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama "has not reached across party lines to get anything significant done."


Quote:
• Obama collaborated with Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., in 2006 to pass a law (PL 109-282) creating a Google-like database of federal contracts and grants allowing users to type in key words that would bring up exactly how much money any particular recipient received.

• With then-Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard G. Lugar, R-Ind., Obama won enactment of a 2006 law (PL 109-401) that allowed the United States to export nuclear fuel, technology and reactors to India for the first time in three decades. The law accepted India as a nuclear-armed power and was enacted despite concerns about India’s ties to Iran and past sanctions for transferring sensitive equipment to Iran.

• He also worked with Lugar on a Senate bill that authorized the president to carry out a program to provide assistance to foreign countries to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Another part of the measure was intended to stop the spread of conventional weapons, notably shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles that the legislation refers to as man-portable air defense systems, or MANPADS. The bill's provisions were incorporated into a House bill that passed later that year and was signed into law in January 2007(PL 109-472) .
__________________
Is Intolerant Because He Won't Let The Intolerant Run Other People's Lives.
Hatuey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 10:15 AM   #8 (permalink)
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 11:52 PM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 20,156
Thanks: 4,508
Thanked 2,762 Times in 1,983 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by obvious Child View Post
Palin has stated this:

PALIN: "There is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it's easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state senate."

The problem is that Obama passed legislation to stop shipments of WMD. Esteemed Senator Lugar has spent much of his career trying to destroy and stop these weapons. By calling Obama's weapons control WMD "minor" it does stand to reason that Palin also considers her fellow republican's legislation to secure this country and the world to be "minor."

I got a real problem with someone who thinks that intercepting, destroying and overall reducing WMDs is "minor."
I don't think we are supposed to point out the new "Messiah's" spin. It's blasphemy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 10:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
1.20.13



 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 10:30 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,671
Thanks: 1,049
Thanked 1,806 Times in 1,316 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

Quote:
Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002 View Post
I don't think we are supposed to point out the new "Messiah's" spin. It's blasphemy.
you have months and months to go, and still it wont be nowhere close.


See people like Palin for who she is and what she has done, along with her conservative stances.

her story is an American story....


not a half kenyan pop culture lawyer story meant to look like the 2nd coming......
Reverend_Hellh0und is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-08, 10:22 AM   #10 (permalink)
Pundit-licious

 
shuamort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 07:58 PM
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 7,303
Thanks: 275
Thanked 933 Times in 532 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to shuamort Send a message via Yahoo to shuamort

Awards:
Veteran Moderator:  Thank you for all your contributions to DebatePolitics! 

Re: Does Palin considers nuclear weapons control to be 'minor?'

By "minor" she means that it's ok if they get pregnant as long as they don't have an abortion.
shuamort is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WMDs... conserv.pat15 Polls 255 03-29-07 10:17 PM
Key Democrats position on the war in Iraq..... Navy Pride Archives 14 03-25-07 03:54 PM
Paper: Israel Plans Nuclear Strike On Iran Cold Dirt Archives 70 01-13-07 10:23 AM
Shouldn't the US fear Iran too? alphieb Archives 242 02-02-06 08:26 AM
Saddam's Uranium Stockpile ANAV Archives 51 11-18-05 01:16 AM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Captain America
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO