Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > United States only > US Elections

US Elections NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama; Originally Posted by talloulou People who read the NYT have no interest in McCain. That's a BIG generalization there, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-08, 03:15 AM   #11 (permalink)
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 07:16 PM
Posts: 7,461
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 672 Times in 508 Posts

Awards:
US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 

Thread Starter Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by talloulou View Post
People who read the NYT have no interest in McCain.
That's a BIG generalization there, little lady.

And, aside from that generalization, are you saying they were lying about their admiration for him before this election cycle?
__________________
But, when all is said and done, Senator McCain has not spent decades aiding and abetting people who hate America. http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell060508.php3
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 07-22-08, 03:48 AM   #12 (permalink)
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 07:16 PM
Posts: 7,461
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 672 Times in 508 Posts

Awards:
US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 

Thread Starter Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by danarhea View Post
McCain's op-ed piece has a huge logical hole in it.

The purpose of the surge, as stated by Bush, and also McCain, who supported it, was so that Iraq could create a political solution, and be able to solve their own problems.
This was also echoed by Bush himself before he authorized the surge.

So here is the hole in John McCain's argument....

1) If it is true that we cannot leave Iraq, then the troop surge has not accomplished its purpose. If the troop surge failed, then we cannot leave, and we have not accomplished the objective.

2) If, on the other hand, the troop surge accomplished its purpose, then, according to the the administration's own stated objective, and reasoning, we should be able to leave Iraq, because that objective has been met.

You see, McCain can't have it both ways, and appear to be the least bit credible.
You fail to see the situation clearly.

The process of creating a functioning government from scratch takes time. It is made impossibly difficult with widespread violence going on throughout the land, day and night.

Even if there was NO violence from now on there would still be a need for our troops there until the threat of infiltration and internal subversion by Iran is no longer a problem.

How would you like it if, after we have poured billions of dollars into rebuilding, retraining and re-equipping Iraq and its security & military forces then we left and the Iranians began to seep in? If they came in before a habit or tradition of integrity and national loyalty had been instilled into the Iraqi government, military and people, the Iranians could easily force, intimidate, bribe, or otherwise persuade the Govt. officials or military or police or key people within the national infrastructure to do a certain thing or not do a certain thing and voila! The Iranians would be on their way to controlling Iraq.

And they would have a well equipped and functioning society, thanks to us and it would have been virtually handed to the Iranians on a silver platter.

Iraq is like a hospital patient who has suffered a concussion and wants to be released from the hospital as soon as he regains consciousness but the doctor says that he should stay for another day or two for observation because just because he feels ok now doesn't mean that he's able to functional normally just yet.

The surge has worked astonishingly well in reducing the level of violence so that the business of rebuilding the country can proceed in earnest. But the work that has just now begun requires a stability that just can't be short changed.

The President has ALWAYS said we will stand down as soon as the Iraqis can stand up. Well they are now starting to stand up. And guess what?

There are 20,000 fewer troops in Iraq than there were when the Surge began. So, there is progress being made.

I gather you are a professional musician. As soon as you finish your last song do you break down your equipment and rush home?

No.

You get paid. You talk with fans to keep them happy. You talk with representatives of the establishment to keep them informed and happy. You may have a drink and shoot the breeze. You might network with some of the other musicians who played with you. You might talk about the next gig or who is available to sit in for the drummer whose wife is preggers and might deliver next week. Then you break everything down and load it up and go home.

Why?

Because the job entails more than just performing and going home. If you neglect the post performance stuff and you might not have as long a run at that place as you might have liked.

If you are a happily married man you know that after making love with your wife you had better not get into the habit of just getting up afterwards and dashing off elsewhere. The afterglow cuddling and pillow talk is part of the deal.

There is no getting around it.

If you think the job is done as soon as the main performance is complete you will soon learn otherwise.
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:05 AM   #13 (permalink)
1.20.13


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 12:05 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,467
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 1,772 Times in 1,287 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by talloulou View Post
People who read the NYT have no interest in McCain.


didn't they fawn over the "maverick" for years? Even endorsing him before the hanging??
__________________
كافر
Never forget those who died.
Never forget those who killed them.
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reverend_Hellh0und For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-08, 07:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 11:06 AM
Posts: 10,902
Thanks: 2,757
Thanked 1,264 Times in 854 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
didn't they fawn over the "maverick" for years? Even endorsing him before the hanging??
Frankly, I was a huge fan of his in 2000. I may have even voted for him over Gore had McCain been the nominee. Back then, he had morals and convictions and stood by his convictions. He has changed over the years. He told Bush back in 2000 that he (Bush) should be ashamed of the things that Bush had said about McCain as a veteran. Now I see him butt kissing Bush like no one's business. He puts out an add that blames high gas prices on Obama? Who does he think he is foolling? He should be ashamed of himself. He is a pandering, unsophisticated man who has lost my respect.
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aps For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-08, 07:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
1.20.13


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 12:05 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,467
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 1,772 Times in 1,287 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
Frankly, I was a huge fan of his in 2000. I may have even voted for him over Gore had McCain been the nominee. Back then, he had morals and convictions and stood by his convictions. He has changed over the years. He told Bush back in 2000 that he (Bush) should be ashamed of the things that Bush had said about McCain as a veteran. Now I see him butt kissing Bush like no one's business. He puts out an add that blames high gas prices on Obama? Who does he think he is foolling? He should be ashamed of himself. He is a pandering, unsophisticated man who has lost my respect.

question.


how do you view the other canidate. does he not have these same traits on his side of things?


personally i dont see a lick of difference between them
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:44 AM   #16 (permalink)
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 07:16 PM
Posts: 7,461
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 672 Times in 508 Posts

Awards:
US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 

Thread Starter Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
question.


how do you view the other canidate. does he not have these same traits on his side of things?


personally i dont see a lick of difference between them
You haven't heard of Obama's Global Poverty Bill, then.




$845 Billion Dollar Obama Bill at Sunflower Desert
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:45 AM   #17 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 11:06 AM
Posts: 10,902
Thanks: 2,757
Thanked 1,264 Times in 854 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
question.


how do you view the other canidate. does he not have these same traits on his side of things?


personally i dont see a lick of difference between them
I support Obama even with his imperfections.
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:46 AM   #18 (permalink)
1.20.13


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 12:05 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,467
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 1,772 Times in 1,287 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

i keep my blolt carrier well oiled for the day the UN comes to collect a tax.
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:51 AM   #19 (permalink)
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 07:16 PM
Posts: 7,461
Thanks: 1,927
Thanked 672 Times in 508 Posts

Awards:
US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 

Thread Starter Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
Frankly, I was a huge fan of his in 2000. I may have even voted for him over Gore had McCain been the nominee. Back then, he had morals and convictions and stood by his convictions. He has changed over the years. He told Bush back in 2000 that he (Bush) should be ashamed of the things that Bush had said about McCain as a veteran. Now I see him butt kissing Bush like no one's business. He puts out an add that blames high gas prices on Obama? Who does he think he is foolling? He should be ashamed of himself. He is a pandering, unsophisticated man who has lost my respect.
Obama's bill "subordinates U.S. foreign policy to the U.N. and commits us to fulfill what are called the U.N. Millennium goals — that is, 0.7 percent of GNP to foreign aid. And that means we’ve got to come up (with) $845 billion...”

CHANGE!

bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-08, 07:53 AM   #20 (permalink)
1.20.13


 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Today 12:05 PM
Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 13,467
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 1,772 Times in 1,287 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Re: NYT Rejects Mccain's Editorial; Should 'mirror' Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by aps View Post
I support Obama even with his imperfections.
but my question is how do they differ in thier imperfections?
Reverend_Hellh0und is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
McCain's $3.3 Trillion Tax Cut, Budget Pledge at Odds Hatuey *Breaking News* 293 05-08-08 03:44 PM
If McCain's spiritual guide called for the destruction of another religion...... Hatuey Polls 46 05-05-08 04:23 PM
McCain's associations with multiple radical pastors. Hatuey Polls 1 05-03-08 12:23 PM
Rod Parsley: McCain's Anti-Gay "Spiritual Guide" 26 X World Champs Archives 120 03-21-08 07:57 PM
Debunking the talking point about McCain's ACU rating of 82.3 danarhea Archives 19 02-12-08 06:23 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by chevydriver1123
· · ·
Member Galleries
1007 photos
218 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO