Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 1. With all that has been said, if you are between the ages of 18 and 44 years old, do you think that you are obligated to serve this country by way of a back door draft, or a direct military draft? |
No. Not only does Federal Prison not scare me, but i would refuse to join even if under pressure of firing squad. And while i would not want to die or kill for a illegitimate purpose, i would die myself long before I would take someone else's life.
If it was a real war for a good purpose such as WW2, I would serve if drafted and if i was younger I might even join.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 2. Do you think Iran and other Arab countries are are strong threat to America and American interests around the world-such as Israel? If you think Iran and other Arabs are a strong threat to American interests around the world, and Israel-would you be willing to go to the Middle East-or where ever the American government needs you? WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO DIE FOR AMERICA? WHY OR WHY NOT-AND BE HONEST. |
No. I would not die to support global conquest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 3. Do you think war and killing is patriotic, and a right of passage for young Americans? |
There is nothing patriotic about pre-emptive attacks or wars that are against our Nation's long term interests.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 4. Do you think that the president, senators, and congressman/women who have children who are between the ages of 18 and 44 should lead by example by drafting their own children into the military first, or sending their own children into combat zones first under a back door draft, so that they can lead by example, and practice what they preach to the rest of us? |
For political wars and wars of aggression... sounds good. But i would rather it be "ONLY" the politicians families.
If it was a real war for a real cause, then this would start to seem real silly, real fast though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 5. And, for everyone else-Do you think John McCain is politically old school, and a war mongerer? Do you think that diplomacy should be used instead of war, or do you think a combinaton of diplomacy and war should be used in dealing with Iran and all of America's other enemies? |
War with Iran is not an option. Iran is much more powerful than Iraq. They have the ability to halt oil flow around the world by attacking oil targets.
They have the ability to hit our eastern seaboard with missiles.
There is also nothing to "deal" about.
We can not have a nuclear armed Iran. And the only way of reaching that goal is to have someone in office that is capable of diplomacy. Not only diplomacy with Iran but with the world. Because it will require both pressure from the world AND U.S. negotiations and sacrifices to accomplish what is needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 6. Do you think John McCain would be just an older version of George W. Bush-possibly worse if he is elected president? Or, do you think John McCain would make a good president? And, should John McCain's military service be a required standard for future candidates running for president? Why or why not-and be honest. |
I think McCain is considerably worse than Bush for several reasons.
Bush is bad simply because his intelligence is lower than the average American and because he is mostly controlled by big business with a variety of warped agendas.
But McCain is a loose cannon who runs off emotion and thinks the military is the answer for everything.
His temper is one of the worst I have seen. His age makes him out of touch with reality.
I am unsure of the second part question on Military backgrounds.
But I would be closer to banning anyone from the military from running for President than I would be for requiring it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 7. Do you really think that Iran is really all that much of a threat to America or Israel, or is this just another cover that the American government is using to validate the use of force on foreign nations in order to obtain what they want? |
Yes, I do think Iran is a threat if they were to acquire Nuclear Weapons.
And since war is simply not an option, we are going to have to do a hell of a lot better than Bush/McCain if we are to get through this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wordz 8. And, with the cost of high gas prices, job losses, and the morgage and corporate meltdowns in America-do you really think the American people have benefitted from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Do you really think we would benefit from a war with Iran-or just have more quagmire wars, and an increase in dead American soldiers? Do you think that Israel will eventually be destroyed regardless of how much support America gives Israel, or regardless of what Ameirca does? Be Honest. |
Of course we have not benefited.
But i care infinitely more about the 1,000,000 deaths we have caused and the suffering than i care about what benefits us or doesn't.
Our economy is not worth even 1 human life from any country.
Israel? Israel has a nuclear arsenal and will use it.
They will not fall and do not need our help.
They already beat down the united Arab Military once before on their own.
Israel can only fall to a nuclear strike and because they are small, it would not take many nukes.
All the more reason why McCain simply can not be our Leader and why we must have a Leader that is respected around the world and capable of diplomacy.