Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives More Bad News for Obama?; I know the "true" Obama supporters will believe him no matter what news comes out, but it's ...

 
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-08, 07:01 PM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
Student
 
conman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Last Online: 09-20-08 01:51 PM
Location: Arizona
Posts: 291
Thanks: 39
Thanked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

More Bad News for Obama?

I know the "true" Obama supporters will believe him no matter what news comes out, but it's tough to discount his relationship with this crazy *** church.

Quote:
ELECTION 2008
Obama church published
Hamas terror manifesto
Compares charter calling for murder
of Jews to Declaration of Independence
Posted: March 20, 2008
12:45 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily


Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook

JERUSALEM – Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church reprinted a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group's official charter – which calls for the murder of Jews – to America's Declaration of Independence.

The Hamas piece was published on the "Pastor's Page" of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks landed Obama in hot water, prompting the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech earlier this week.

Hamas, responsible for scores of shootings, suicide bombings and rocket launchings against civilian population centers, is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.

The revelation follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

In his July 22, 2007, church newsletter, Wright reprinted an article by Mousa Abu Marzook, identified in the publication as a "deputy of the political bureau of Hamas." A photo image of the piece was captured and posted today by the business blog BizzyBlog, which first brought attention to it. The Hamas article was first published by the Los Angeles Times, garnering the newspaper much criticism.

(Story continues below)


According to senior Israeli security officials, Marzook, who resides in Syria alongside Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshaal, is considered the "brains" behind Hamas, designing much of the terror group's policies and ideology. Israel possesses what it says is a large volume of specific evidence that Marzook has been directly involved in calling for or planning scores of Hamas terrorist offensives, including deadly suicide bombings. He was also accused of attempting to set up a Hamas network in the U.S.

Marzook's original piece was titled, "Hamas' stand" but was re-titled "A Fresh View of the Palestinian Struggle" by Obama's church newsletter. The newsletter also referred to Hamas as the "Islamic Resistance Movement," and added in its introduction that Marzook was addressing Hamas' goals for "all of Palestine."

In the manifesto, Marzook refers to Hamas' "resistance" – the group's perpetuation of anti-Israel terrorism targeting civilians – as "legal resistance," which, he argues, is "explicitly supported by the Fourth Geneva Convention."

The Convention, which refers to the rights of people living under occupation, does not support suicide bombings or rocket attacks against civilian population centers, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America noted.

Marzook refers to Hamas' official charter as "an essentially revolutionary document" and compares the violent creed to the Declaration of Independence, which, Marzook states, "simply did not countenance any such status for the 700,000 African slaves at that time."

Hamas' charter calls for the murder of Jews. Among its platforms is a statement that the "[resurrection] will not take place until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them, and the rock and the tree will say: 'Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, kill him!'"

In his piece, Marzook says Hamas only targets Israel and denies that Hamas' war is meant to be waged against the U.S., even though Hamas officials have threatened America, and Hamas' charter calls for Muslims to "pursue the cause of the Movement (Hamas), all over the globe."

Trinity Church did not respond to a phone message requesting comment.

Obama's campaign also did not reply to phone and e-mail requests today for comment.
conman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 03-22-08, 07:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Liberal elite guy



 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Last Online: Today 09:11 AM
Location: In your banks...redistributing your wealths
Posts: 6,912
Thanks: 1,180
Thanked 1,552 Times in 1,005 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army Reserve:  12 years US Army Reserve US Army:  4 years active duty, US Army 

Current Mood:
Amused
Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Interesting. Once a credible news source gets ahold of this I'll really pay attention.
__________________
I was so right. And you? Well you were so wrong. You lost. Ha. Ha.
Lerxst is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 09:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Last Online: 11-13-08 07:43 PM
Posts: 1,785
Thanks: 115
Thanked 317 Times in 236 Posts

Awards:
US Marines:   

Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Oh, its true alright. My church's newsletter publishes carwash fundraiser events, deacon's news, kids stuff and recipes. Never a word from HAMAS. Why did Obama let himself get hooked up with these people? It will cost him the presidency.
aegyptos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 10:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
thrifty

 
niftydrifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Last Online: Today 08:53 AM
Posts: 3,406
Thanks: 463
Thanked 763 Times in 486 Posts

Awards:
True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #5 True Debate Winner:  True Debate Winner 

Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aegyptos View Post
Oh, its true alright. My church's newsletter publishes carwash fundraiser events, deacon's news, kids stuff and recipes. Never a word from HAMAS. Why did Obama let himself get hooked up with these people? It will cost him the presidency.
what do you mean by "it"?

the fact that people eager not to vote for a black guy will eagerly dismiss him using stuff that somebody he knows has done?

people are goofy enough not to realize they're not voting for the pastor?

that it doesn't matter that the newsletter came out after Obama stopped attending the church?
__________________
"I admit it. The liberal media were never that powerful, and the whole thing was often used as an excuse by conservatives for conservative failures." - Bill Kristol
niftydrifty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 10:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
Little Ms Sunshine

 
1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 07:20 AM
Posts: 13,727
Thanks: 4,146
Thanked 2,366 Times in 1,726 Posts

Awards:
Asshat of the year:  Winner of the Debate Politics 2008 Asshat of the Year Award. Congratulations! Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Where
Re: More Bad News for Obama?

I think- how shall I put this?- that something that's being overlooked here is that this Trinity United Church of Christ is a megachurch, with some 8000+ members.
While that's undoubtedly not all or even most of the black christians in the greater Chicago area, it is a significant minority.
Rather than berate Obama, Oprah Winfrey, and other celebrity TUCC members and former members, perhaps we should take a look at the reality of the situation: that this is not some fringe element radical cult full of extremist kooks, it's one of the largest and most powerful black churches in the country, and boasts a parishioner roster which includes politicians, social activists, and billionaires.
This church represents the wealthy black Christian mainstream.
More, this church represents a hub of black power.

What should concern us more than the fact that Obama belonged to a nutty radical fringe cult is the fact that TUCC is not in fact radical nor fringey nor a cult. It's what thousands of black christians- the wealthy and powerful elite of black American society- actually believe and feel.
Why aren't we listening?
We dismiss them as flakes to our own detriment, which is the same thing I've always said about politically powerful white megachurches such as Dr. Dobson's ministry.
__________________
Lightdemon: "Is 10 going to outer space or something?"
Jerry: "...yes, 10 is going to outerspace."
1069 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 10:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Advisor
 
FluffyNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Online: 10-28-08 08:29 PM
Location: "Jesusland USA" (Mississippi)
Posts: 325
Thanks: 40
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army Reserve:  I proudly served in the U.S. Army Reserve from June, 1988 until July, 1998 in the 305th Field Hospital atached to the 83rd Medical Group. Did a one-year tour in Saudi Arabia in 1991 as a 91 Bravo (Combat Medic) during Operation Desert Storm. 

Current Mood:
Doubtful
Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by niftydrifty View Post
what do you mean by "it"?

the fact that people eager not to vote for a black guy will eagerly dismiss him using stuff that somebody he knows has done?

people are goofy enough not to realize they're not voting for the pastor?

that it doesn't matter that the newsletter came out after Obama stopped attending the church?
I think "it's" the idea that Obama refuses to publicy disown these people or denounce their words/actions. Obama supporters must wince each time he goes on record and attempts to rationalize or justify the behavior of his "former" pastor and church.
__________________
Ask not what you can do for your country, ask, "Where's my government handout?"
FluffyNinja is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 10:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Educator

 
Chanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Today 11:01 AM
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 469
Thanked 359 Times in 249 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female

Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aegyptos View Post
Oh, its true alright.
There isn't a lot of truth in Aaron Klein's article. He calls it a manifesto, but actually it was an opinion piece reprinted from the LA Times. Compare the actual article to Klein's claims:

Hamas' stand - Los Angeles Times
__________________
When I despair, I remember that all through history, the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end, they always fall - think of it, always.---Mahatma Gandhi
Chanda is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 10:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
thrifty

 
niftydrifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Last Online: Today 08:53 AM
Posts: 3,406
Thanks: 463
Thanked 763 Times in 486 Posts

Awards:
True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #5 True Debate Winner:  True Debate Winner 

Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FluffyNinja View Post
I think "it's" the idea that Obama refuses to publicy disown these people or denounce their words/actions. Obama supporters must wince each time he goes on record and attempts to rationalize or justify the behavior of his "former" pastor and church.
you're kidding, right?

obama denounces - Google Search
niftydrifty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 11:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Advisor
 
FluffyNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Last Online: 10-28-08 08:29 PM
Location: "Jesusland USA" (Mississippi)
Posts: 325
Thanks: 40
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army Reserve:  I proudly served in the U.S. Army Reserve from June, 1988 until July, 1998 in the 305th Field Hospital atached to the 83rd Medical Group. Did a one-year tour in Saudi Arabia in 1991 as a 91 Bravo (Combat Medic) during Operation Desert Storm. 

Current Mood:
Doubtful
Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by niftydrifty View Post
you're kidding, right?

obama denounces - Google Search
This was from the first page of your Google search. From the Chicago Suntimes
Quote:
Obama denounces rhetoric but stands behind his pastor

March 16, 2008Recommend (3)

BY ABDON M. PALLASCH Political Reporter/apallasch@suntimes.com
White House hopeful Barack Obama on Friday denounced the controversial statements of his longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but said he still had a great deal of respect for the man who married him and baptized his children.

"I have been frustrated by how the church has been described a 'separatist' church -- this is a terrific, welcoming church ... that has a record of helping the homeless and dealing with HIV/AIDS," Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times.



Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., left, shown here with his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, March 10, 2005. Obama on Friday March 14, 2008 denounced inflammatory remarks from his pastor, who has railed against the United States and accused the country of bringing on the Sept. 11 attacks by spreading terrorism.
(AP)



RELATED STORIES
More Rezko dough found
But after a report on ABC-TV Friday morning, the television and radio waves were full of excerpts of sermons Wright gave, going back to 2002. "'God bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," Wright said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."

In a sermon after 9/11, Wright said, "The stuff we have done overseas is brought right back into our homes."

He criticized Hilary Clinton, saying she was a rich white woman who had never been called a "n-----."

Obama said he had never heard Wright preach any of those sermons.

"If I had heard Rev. Wright making these statements when I was in the pews," Obama said, "I would have talked to him afterwards and said, 'I am very troubled by these statements.' "

Obama disinvited Wright from his speech in February 2007 announcing his candidacy for president. On Friday, after issuing a statement strongly denouncing his sermons, he said Wright would no longer be serving on an advisory committee.
This really doesn't sound like "disowning." And he seems to only be "denouncing" what he refers to as "rhetoric" and "controversial statements." Why can't he just call it what it is - racist hate speech! Obama certainly didn't have a problem calling out Don Imus last year. Do I smell double-standard here?

Finally, here's what Barack said five days ago:
Quote:
"I can no more disown [the Rev. Jeremiah Wright] than I can my white grandmother," Barack Obama said in the most powerful sentence of his extraordinary speech about race on March 18 in Philadelphia, "a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me ... but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."
FluffyNinja is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-22-08, 11:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
thrifty

 
niftydrifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Last Online: Today 08:53 AM
Posts: 3,406
Thanks: 463
Thanked 763 Times in 486 Posts

Awards:
True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #5 True Debate Winner:  True Debate Winner 

Re: More Bad News for Obama?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FluffyNinja View Post
This was from the first page of your Google search. From the Chicago Suntimes

This really doesn't sound like "disowning." And he seems to only be "denouncing" what he refers to as "rhetoric" and "controversial statements." Why can't he just call it what it is - racist hate speech! Obama certainly didn't have a problem calling out Don Imus last year. Do I smell double-standard here?

Finally, here's what Barack said five days ago:
in your earlier post you said he hadn't denounced the statements. I showed you that he had. it sounds like you're not going to accept anything he says.
niftydrifty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/29617-more-bad-news-obama.html
Posted By For Type Date
WASALive ! Obama - Debate Politics Forums This thread Refback 03-24-08 06:04 PM
WASALive ! Jeremiah wright This thread Refback 03-22-08 10:02 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server down - good & bad news vauge Feedback / Suggestions 1 12-04-07 11:02 PM
Liberal bias in the media? GottaHurt Archives 202 11-07-07 06:42 AM
Fox news mikhail Archives 183 09-26-07 12:59 AM
Niftydrifty vs Cold Dirt: FNC exemplifies poor journalism, much more biased than NYT niftydrifty Private Debates 3 02-01-07 10:19 AM
NYT proves it's bias again Stinger Archives 18 11-14-05 04:44 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO