• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Here's the election truth folks!

EvaPeron said:
It's funny, Trump has thousands of people attend his rallies to Hillary's hundreds. He drew more votes in the Primaries than any other GOP candidate in all of history. There is more talk and more publicity about him than at any other time and for any other candidate, but when someone shows a poll that looks like he is taking a large number of the votes - it is suddenly a conspiracy. Do you see the irony in your statement?
Click to expand...

If you had looked at the responses, you'd realize that the poll he posted was from a fake website with a .co ending, it's not actually ABC News. Even if it weren't a fake poll, one poll out of hundreds is not evidence of a conspiracy. Take off your tin foil hat and start facing reality.
 
Here's a comment from the source:

"I have received several messages stating that ABCnewsgo.co is a fake web site that faked the poll showing Trump way ahead. I have checked on this, and even if it is not ABC News, the poll there is legitimate, and was cast by legitimate people, as this new poll by MSNBC confirms.

hillno.gif


"How did I know the ABCnewsgo poll was real? EASY. Just look it up on Alexa. People who browse alternative media web sites don't show up on Alexa because so few of them use the Alexa tool bar (They typically don't have anything like that installed). Yet Alexa has web site charting HIGH AS A KITE FROM DAY ONE the place existed, which means it popped to life INSTANTLY and has already hit the top 20,000 web sites in America despite only even being known by Alexa for less than a week. Alexa confirms that the number one web site that drove people to that poll was Topix, which is as mainstream as it gets.

"Could I be wrong about it really being an ABC news site? YEP. but that is irrelevant, because the site got enough hits to drive that poll legitimately. Even if it is not really affiliated with ABC News, it did get the traffic and therefore the poll is probably real. So ... that was NOT a blunder, ALEXA PROVES IT."

(caps in original)

And then there's this one from Newsmax:

To the question, In a presidential race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, whom would you vote for?

Trump beats Clinton 79-20, with a sample of nearly 100,000:

Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
 
No Shanners, its not legitimate, and you got owned.

Newsmax? Online poll? :lamo
 
Last edited:
shanners said:
Here's a comment from the source:

"I have received several messages stating that ABCnewsgo.co is a fake web site that faked the poll showing Trump way ahead. I have checked on this, and even if it is not ABC News, the poll there is legitimate, and was cast by legitimate people, as this new poll by MSNBC confirms.

hillno.gif


"How did I know the ABCnewsgo poll was real? EASY. Just look it up on Alexa. People who browse alternative media web sites don't show up on Alexa because so few of them use the Alexa tool bar (They typically don't have anything like that installed). Yet Alexa has web site charting HIGH AS A KITE FROM DAY ONE the place existed, which means it popped to life INSTANTLY and has already hit the top 20,000 web sites in America despite only even being known by Alexa for less than a week. Alexa confirms that the number one web site that drove people to that poll was Topix, which is as mainstream as it gets.

"Could I be wrong about it really being an ABC news site? YEP. but that is irrelevant, because the site got enough hits to drive that poll legitimately. Even if it is not really affiliated with ABC News, it did get the traffic and therefore the poll is probably real. So ... that was NOT a blunder, ALEXA PROVES IT."

(caps in original)

And then there's this one from Newsmax:

To the question, In a presidential race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, whom would you vote for?

Trump beats Clinton 79-20, with a sample of nearly 100,000:

Newsmax.com - Breaking news from around the globe: U.S. news, politics, world, health, finance, video, science, technology, live news stream
Click to expand...

This poll was also on the Newsmax website. It shows Hillary leading by 4 points....and its a Pew poll.....a bit more reputable. So what's your point??
Pew Poll: Clinton Leads Trump By 4 Points
 
I'm so glad someone created a thread to let me know "the truth".
 
Another update:

'BUSTED: Hillary Clinton's official campaign web site's source code has hidden text, calling the 2016 election an "18 month hackathon". The source code then has a link, which goes to a hiring page asking for senior software engineers to join Hillary's campaign! Go to Hillary Clinton's campaign web site and on the front page, view the page source. Above the head statement, there is Hillary's campaign logo in ASCII art and hidden text that appears to brag about rigging the election:

hackathon.png


'And when you go to the link that is in that text, it is a jobs page requesting "senior software engineers" to join Hillary's campaign! QUESTION: WHY WOULD HILLARY NEED FRONT END/BACK END SOFTWARE ENGINEERS?

'Though none of the job descriptions state outright the jobs will be hacking voting machines, you don't need much of a brain to figure out what those software people will really be doing, what the **** else would Hillary need high caliber software people for, especially after a tag line saying the election is an 18 month long hackathon?'
 
shanners said:
Another update:

'BUSTED: Hillary Clinton's official campaign web site's source code has hidden text, calling the 2016 election an "18 month hackathon". The source code then has a link, which goes to a hiring page asking for senior software engineers to join Hillary's campaign! Go to Hillary Clinton's campaign web site and on the front page, view the page source. Above the head statement, there is Hillary's campaign logo in ASCII art and hidden text that appears to brag about rigging the election:

hackathon.png


'And when you go to the link that is in that text, it is a jobs page requesting "senior software engineers" to join Hillary's campaign! QUESTION: WHY WOULD HILLARY NEED FRONT END/BACK END SOFTWARE ENGINEERS?

'Though none of the job descriptions state outright the jobs will be hacking voting machines, you don't need much of a brain to figure out what those software people will really be doing, what the **** else would Hillary need high caliber software people for, especially after a tag line saying the election is an 18 month long hackathon?'
Click to expand...

To combat hackers would be my reasonable guess.
 
shanners said:
How else can it be explained?

Unless you're posturing that that screen shot is fake???
Click to expand...
You know of course that it is...right? Just having folks on?
 
OP, you should be ashannered of yourself.
 
Rico Suave said:
To combat hackers would be my reasonable guess.
Click to expand...

I know it's shocking to ponder her brazen arrogance and that she does not care if the world knows about it.
 
Well, well, what have we here:

hchan.jpg



Clinton told the FBI she "could not recall any briefing or training by State related to the retention of federal records or handling classified information," according to the bureau's notes of their interview with Clinton. The documents indicate Clinton told investigators she either does not "recall" or "remember" at least 39 times - often in response to questions about process, potential training or the content of specific emails.

So if she can't recall any briefing or training by the state related to federal records, she is mentally incompetent and cannot be President. The briefings happened, she signed for them. The other option is that she is a bold faced pathological liar who creatively lied about this 39 times during questioning and therefore lacks the moral authority to be President.
 
votefraud1.gif


"NOW CONFIRMED: 100 percent of ALL machines in ALL precincts and ALL states are flipping the Presidential vote to Clinton when you vote a Republican straight ticket. This is being done at a ratio, which should be possible to catch approximately 45 percent of the time. When people catch this, election officials simply tell them they are too stupid to vote. BUT YOU ARE NOT TOO STUPID TO IGNORE THE WARNINGS AND SHOOT VIDEO OF THIS, ARE YOU? DO IT!

"Though it is possible to have a touch screen malfunction and start to output trash, that is not the same kind of problem as having a touch screen consistently choose an option other than what you have selected. Touch screen calibration issues take the form of having a part of the screen stop working entirely, or for it to become too sensitive and select stuff by itself without being touched, or for it to need to be pushed too hard. Touch screen calibration errors do not just click one box when you check another, or switch the Presidential candidate when you vote a straight ticket. This stuff is happening BY INTENT and there is no way out of it. When is the last time you have ever seen a bank teller machine select options you did not push? I have never seen this happen on a teller machine or any other device, why is it only the voting machines doing it?

"When you see an election machine change your vote to something else, it is your obligation to save the country by destroying it. Don't complain to the election officials, because they know."
 
Did you see today's ABC/WaPo poll? They're basically admitting their poll is rigged. Hillary's whopping 12-point lead from last week mysteriously evaporated, and this week she's left with a paltry 2% advantage, which is well within the statistical margin of error. Additionally, ABC was busted stacking the poll, their sample had an 8% skew in favor of Democrats, and even with that Trump is still even.

Regardless of what our lying Bull**** Media (tm) has to say about it, it seems this will be a very close election. Trump is currently winning in 3 of the 4 major swing states, and whether that'll be enough to take him over the top remains to be seen. A lot of it will have to do with voter turnout, and a lot of it will have to do with those rigged voting machines. There's going to be a lot of eyes on this vote, and I suspect the media pundits will be driven completely insane by the time it's all over.

The media has been consistently wrong about this election. Every step of the way. Every time they've called something, it's been wrong. Clearly, our Bull**** Media (tm) has absolutely no grasp whatsoever on mainstream America. They can't read the voters, and they can't read the political landscape. They've become a sorry joke, just another bought-and-paid-for partisan election symbol. In fact they're so totally incompetent by now they can't even hold a decent poll.

One thing has been shown quite clearly during this election so far: Hillary Clinton is a lying sack of sh*t, she's a crook and she should be behind bars. She's lied seventeen times about her e-mails already, and a few of those lies were to the FBI. If you or me or anyone else did that we'd be in jail, and it's a travesty of our system and a mockery of American justice that she's not only walking around free, she hasn't even been charged. If Hillary Clinton wins this election she'll have the opportunity to put three Supreme Court justices on the bench - for life! And if you look at her actual record, everything she touches turns to sh*t. It'll take one hundred years to undo her stupidity. And we just don't have that kind of time. We're in the middle of something they call "unsustainable", and the Democrats are trying to blow smoke up our butts about what it all means. Hillary seems to think it's all about personalities, and the politics of personal destruction. But all I see is 100 years of money is speech, buildings are people, and penalties are taxes. And I'm very sorry, but I ain't voting for that. No way, no how. Not now, not ever.

They tried that once in Indiana, you know. They tried to legislate the value of Pi. They declared (and passed a law) that the value of Pi shall henceforth be 4.0 - and it made for some very convenient math, and some amazing test scores (for a few months).... but.... these people tried to legislate the value of Pi. I wouldn't vote for that either, any more than I'd vote for Hillary Clinton. I'll take my chances with Door Number Two, thank you very much.
 
ballantine said:
Did you see today's ABC/WaPo poll? They're basically admitting their poll is rigged. Hillary's whopping 12-point lead from last week mysteriously evaporated, and this week she's left with a paltry 2% advantage, which is well within the statistical margin of error. Additionally, ABC was busted stacking the poll, their sample had an 8% skew in favor of Democrats, and even with that Trump is still even.

Regardless of what our lying Bull**** Media (tm) has to say about it, it seems this will be a very close election. Trump is currently winning in 3 of the 4 major swing states, and whether that'll be enough to take him over the top remains to be seen. A lot of it will have to do with voter turnout, and a lot of it will have to do with those rigged voting machines. There's going to be a lot of eyes on this vote, and I suspect the media pundits will be driven completely insane by the time it's all over.

The media has been consistently wrong about this election. Every step of the way. Every time they've called something, it's been wrong. Clearly, our Bull**** Media (tm) has absolutely no grasp whatsoever on mainstream America. They can't read the voters, and they can't read the political landscape. They've become a sorry joke, just another bought-and-paid-for partisan election symbol. In fact they're so totally incompetent by now they can't even hold a decent poll.

One thing has been shown quite clearly during this election so far: Hillary Clinton is a lying sack of sh*t, she's a crook and she should be behind bars. She's lied seventeen times about her e-mails already, and a few of those lies were to the FBI. If you or me or anyone else did that we'd be in jail, and it's a travesty of our system and a mockery of American justice that she's not only walking around free, she hasn't even been charged. If Hillary Clinton wins this election she'll have the opportunity to put three Supreme Court justices on the bench - for life! And if you look at her actual record, everything she touches turns to sh*t. It'll take one hundred years to undo her stupidity. And we just don't have that kind of time. We're in the middle of something they call "unsustainable", and the Democrats are trying to blow smoke up our butts about what it all means. Hillary seems to think it's all about personalities, and the politics of personal destruction. But all I see is 100 years of money is speech, buildings are people, and penalties are taxes. And I'm very sorry, but I ain't voting for that. No way, no how. Not now, not ever.

They tried that once in Indiana, you know. They tried to legislate the value of Pi. They declared (and passed a law) that the value of Pi shall henceforth be 4.0 - and it made for some very convenient math, and some amazing test scores (for a few months).... but.... these people tried to legislate the value of Pi. I wouldn't vote for that either, any more than I'd vote for Hillary Clinton. I'll take my chances with Door Number Two, thank you very much.
Click to expand...

They certainly want you to believe it will be a close election. Easier to rig that way.

"TAKE A LOOK AT THIS CHART, AND NEVER FORGET: THIS IS WHERE TRUMP DID THE WORST!

"This is the early voting chart for Florida. In my post yesterday titled "Do not forgive" I stated Trump had 68 percent of the popular vote in Florida, which was the worst he did anywhere. We also know that Florida is getting massively rigged for Hillary, and absent the rigging, Trump would have exceeded 82 percent. I was not blowing smoke, the chart below for early voting in Florida (with considerably more rigged Hillary votes thrown in) STILL SHOWS TRUMP AT 64.8 PERCENT OF THE POPULAR VOTE."

earlyvote.gif
 
'Thanks to the magic of Wikileaks, we now know EXACTLY which mainstream media reporters have been completely compromised by Hillary Clinton! A new set of emails released from John Podesta reveal 2 top-secret lists of reporters getting their cues DIRECTLY from Hillary.

'John Podesta actually sent out an invitation to THESE 63 major reporters to have an “off-the-record” dinner at his mansion where they could plan their strategy on how to beat the American people.

'Here is a copy of the original Email:'

hillary-wikileaks-reporter.jpg




This list has been compiled for easy reading, the original, from the Podesta mails, is HERE

Now we know where donations to the Clinton foundation really go to! Buying off these reporters would not be cheap!


ABC - Cecilia Vega, David Muir, Diane Sawyer, George Stephanoplous, John Karl, Liz Kreutz

AP - Julie Pace, Ken Thomas, Lisa Lerer

AURN - April Ryan

Bloomberg - John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Jennifer Epstein

Buzzfeed - Ruby Cramer

CBS - Norah O'Donnell, Vicki Gordon, Steve Chagaris

CNBC - John Harwood

CNN - Brianna Keilar, David Chalian, Gloria Borger, Jeff Zeleny, John Berman, Kate Bouldan, Mark Preston, Sam Feist, Dan Merica

Daily Beast - Jackie Kucinich

GPG - Mike Feldman

Huffington Post - Whitney Snyder, Amanda Terkel

Los Angeles Times - Mike Memoli, Evan Handler

McClatchy - Anita Kumar

MORE - Betsy Fisher Martin

MSNBC - Rachel Racusen, Alex Wagner, Beth Fouhy, Phil Griffin, Rachel Maddow, Alex Seitz-Wald

National Journal - Emily Schultheis

NBC - Savannah Guthrie, Mark Murray

New Yorker - Ryan Liza

New York Times - Amy Chozik, Gail Collins, Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman, Pat Healey,

NPR - Tamara Keith

People Magazine - Sandra Sobieraj Westfall

Politico - Glenn Thrush, Mike Allen, Annie Karni, Gabe Debenedetti

Reuters - Amanda Becker

The Hill - Amie Parnes

Washington Post - Anne Gearan, Peter Nicholas, Colleen McCain Nelson

Wall Street Journal - Laura Meckler,

Vice - Alyssa Mastramonoco

Vox - John Allen
 
BUSTED: NEWSWEEK ALREADY HAS THE CLINTON VICTORY SPECIAL EDITION IN BOXES READY TO SHIP

'Trolls are saying this is pre-production and they "probably" have a Trump version too. NOT SO, NOT THIS FAR BEFORE THE ELECTION DAY. There are boxes and boxes of these, which would not be needed if it was not rigged because with high speed offset web presses placed nationwide they can start distribution within hours in each local area and have it to the news stands a LOT FASTER than printing it up beforehand and trucking it everywhere. The fact it is already in print, COMPLETE WITH BARCODEwhen it should only be in PDF, or other computer file form SAYS IT ALL.

' "Your argument is "well They have both candidates in print as winning so they are ready to go." Here is the problem with that theory. In 2012 the only candidate leaked magazine and tv polls showed winning was Obama. No one else! That kills that theory." '

'There is a DDOS attack underway over this report, and it is getting banned everywhere ... Check your pages frequently, because part of circumventing DDOS attacks is changing how things are routed.'

Let's see if I have to post this again.

newsweek800.jpg
 
Escalating Matters: the Peculiar Mental Scotoma that Afflicts Hillary Fans

Posted on 11 Nov 16 by BRAD KEYES • 27 Comments
Perhaps the thing most common*ly misunderstood by pollsters, mainstream journalists and other trotsko-izquierdistas is the difference between short-term noise (green) and their own feb*rile delusions of political relevance (blue). This animation shows how the same straw-poll data that first re*vealed the unstoppable electoral momentum of the next President of These United States (red) can instead … Continue rea

escalator.gif


 
Greetings, Shanners. :2wave:

It looks like Newsweek got fooled by the polls, too! How embarrassing, not to mention costly! :shock:
 
shanners said:
How else can it be explained?
Click to expand...

Do you have the faintest idea of what it would take to control all the powers-that-be (whatever the hell that means) to create that outcome? We still have, very largely, and despite overt excentricities (Fox News), one the most free-presses in the world.

Only some cockamamie Hollywood Movie could promote that supposition as a "real plot" ...
 
Glowpun said:
God wants to punish the USA.
Click to expand...

God doesn't give a damn. Why should he? The vote expresses the free-will of the people.

Uncle Sam is punishing himself. Some call it self-flagellation ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom