• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will there be a Stop Trump campaign in the GOP

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
In 1964, William Scranton pulled out all the stops to stop Barry Goldwater from getting the nomination, and it failed. During the convention, Scranton attempted to get George Romney to declare, but Romney turned him down. Goldwater ended up with the nomination, but it was a close call.

Will there be anything similar this year, and will there be any surprises?
 
I am fairly certain there already is effort within the GOP in dealing with Trump depending on how things look a little further down the primary road.
 
That began the moment he showed them he was a serious candidate in the public's eye and has been unceasing.
 
Of course the GOP will pull out all the stops to put an end to the Trump campaign. I expect some exceptionally dirty politics to come out from the GOP. The first debate was an obvious hit job. When it's so obvious Bill Maher is calling out both Luntz and Fox News you know they're not even trying to be subtle.
 
Trump seems inevitable. I don't know what it will take to stop him.
 
Remember how Bush was the guy everyone would like to have a beer with? Well Trump is the guy you want at your side when your business is tanking and you are going in to tough negotiations to save the business.
 
Remember how Bush was the guy everyone would like to have a beer with? Well Trump is the guy you want at your side when your business is tanking and you are going in to tough negotiations to save the business.
Sounds like he should be in the business world then :shrug: Those types of skills don't translate into foreign policy and macroeconomic expertise and/or success overnight or even at all.
 
Trump seems inevitable. I don't know what it will take to stop him.
Well, if he only carries a plurality vs a majority into the convention (possible IMO, with a 3-4 candidate race), the answer to your question might be a brokered convention.

Now how much strength or power the GOP Establishment has in a brokered convention remains to be seen, but it could be substantial. I honestly don't know, because they've become so rare.
 
The most opportune time to stop Trump was early on. I felt back in the summer that the RNC leadership should have blocked Trump from seeking the GOP nomination when he began making his inflammatory statements. The threat at the time was that he would run as an independent. However, at that time, he had yet to build his following, so the threat was much less than it is today.

Today, he has built a loyal and passionate following sufficiently large to take advantage of the fragmented field of candidates. That he lacks the requisite leadership skills, policy experience, policy knowledge, and decency one would expect from a President is irrelevant to his followers. In politics, Trump is essentially Bernie Madoff writ large (not in terms of illegal activity, but in terms of seducing the electorate with unrealistic promises that lack substantive backing). His followers believe his every word about 'making America great,' even as he has no governance experience, much less policy substance to even attempt to deliver on his sweeping promises.

People fall for scams when they accept at face value promises that reasonable scrutiny would reveal are 'too good to be true.' That's what happened with Madoff's "returns" to his investors. That's what's happening under the slogan "Make America great again."

Now, the Party faces a real problem should Trump win the nomination. A loss of the White House in 2016 would only be a low cost compared to the Party's losing the capacity to appeal to a broader slice of the electorate possibly for multiple election cycles. Of course, that problem is largely of its own doing, on account of the RNC leadership's having chosen to try to accommodate Trump early on when it should have pushed him from the race. Political cowardice has a high cost.

Right now, Trump can likely still be beaten, even as the task is more difficult. The RNC leadership should push the remaining bottom two candidates to drop out. It is a de facto three person race, but the bottom two candidates remain capable of sucking up a combined 10%-20% of the vote depending on where the primaries are held. Under such circumstances, Trump can continue to pocket his 30%-40% of the vote and vacuum up delegates moving him closer to clinching the nomination. If Trump gains well over a majority of delegates, a brokered convention will be little more than a convenient fiction that has no chance of success.

IMO, Bush made the right decision to exit the race, personally painful as it was for him. It suggests he sees the larger picture and is willing to act responsibly as a leader to at least mitigate the risk of a very bad outcome. I can't say the same about the latter two candidates. They have put their own personal ambitions ahead of averting what could be a truly bad outcome for the Party and, if by some small chance Trump prevails nationally, the country. Those are not acts of leadership. They are strong arguments that both of them are limited in the leadership area.

I've always thought that about Carson who has no relevant experience whatsoever and whose debate performances have revealed a candidate vastly out-of-touch with policy reality and sometimes barely aware of debate stage developments. He's not much different from the ill-fated Herman Cain of the 2012 cycle. His bizarre departure from the campaign trail after Iowa provided a further example that he should not be in a position with authority. Given the stakes involved, I don't blame the Cruz campaign for speculating that Carson's bizarre decision might have hinted that he would be suspending his campaign, as that's what typically happens when candidates take "time outs." Kasich has surprised me somewhat, as he had stated repeatedly that he would know whether he can be competitive. It's now clear, he cannot be competitive and NH's success was built on the unique circumstances of his devoting enormous time to that state, an approach that cannot be replicated. He's a solid candidate and governor. But his inability to recognize reality has revealed a candidate who is incapable of making tough decisions, as exiting campaigns is a tough decision.

In the meantime, Trump is poised for a Nevada victory and, barring a further culling of the field, success on Super Tuesday, as well.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like he should be in the business world then :shrug: Those types of skills don't translate into foreign policy and macroeconomic expertise and/or success overnight or even at all.

That is a strange thing to say when you consider that the politicians have made a mess out of foreign policy and economic management. There isn't a viable company in the country that isn't better managed than the federal government. Sorry but I think the voters have it right.
 
Back
Top Bottom