• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [3:30 PM CDT] - in 25 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Robert Gates on the current presidential candidates

Dittohead not!

master political analyst
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
52,009
Reaction score
33,944
Location
The Golden State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
[h=1]One of America's most respected former military officials is worried about the 2016 presidential field[/h]
Gates served as the US secretary of defense under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, and is the only person to have held that position under two presidents of two different political parties.
Yet just more than a week before the first votes are cast in the presidential primaries, none of the current crop of candidates, Gates told Business Insider, stands out as especially presidential.

"People are making a lot of grandiose promises and pledges to do one thing or another, either on domestic affairs or on foreign policy," said Gates, who is promoting his new book, "A Passion for Leadership."
"But I haven't heard anybody really talking about how they would fix some of the problems that they're describing and how they would actually implement them," he added.


Gates has it right. None of the candidates are "presidential", nor do they have real solutions to actual problems.
 
[h=1]One of America's most respected former military officials is worried about the 2016 presidential field[/h]





Gates has it right. None of the candidates are "presidential", nor do they have real solutions to actual problems.

Anyone at all interested and armed only with a micro-brain has known that for months. Not one candidate with any chance at all is less than high risk in security and only the one that smells of corruption has the experience required for foreign policy. And this is not as simple as it was in the cold war. We are on the verge of real change.
 
Anyone at all interested and armed only with a micro-brain has known that for months. Not one candidate with any chance at all is less than high risk in security and only the one that smells of corruption has the experience required for foreign policy. And this is not as simple as it was in the cold war. We are on the verge of real change.

and not necessarily change for the better.
 
One of America's most respected former military officials is worried about the 2016 presidential field







Gates has it right. None of the candidates are "presidential", nor do they have real solutions to actual problems.

None? Are you sure? Not a fan of Clinton but she seems to have put forth the status quo. That is wasting lives, time, and money in the middle east. She was a big part of the Iran deal -- at least according to her.

As far as Trump, "You're going to love my foreign policy. Wait and see" is pretty skimpy.

The only one that seems to get the mistakes we've made and not to repeat them is Bernie.

If Gates is so unhappy why didn't he run for president?
 
Back
Top Bottom