Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > United States only > US Elections

US Elections Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008; Originally Posted by Goose While I do agree that Ron Paul is one of the few true Goldwater conservative, we ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-08, 11:17 PM   #91 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: 11-25-08 02:04 PM
Posts: 3,266
Thanks: 239
Thanked 655 Times in 420 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goose View Post
While I do agree that Ron Paul is one of the few true Goldwater conservative, we must stop looking at the world as though it were 9/10/01. It's not. We are at war, whether we like it or not. And so I believe very strongly that it was right that we bring the fight off our soil to the enemies' home. Other than the war, I think Ron Paul is spot on.

In the meantime, for a laugh, check out http://wwwgrandoldtees.com.
I think decent conservatives can disagree on the merits of the war.

We should not disagree on the need for a true declaration of war however.

Paul Calls for Congressional Declaration of War against Iraq
ARealConservative is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 09-19-08, 12:26 PM   #92 (permalink)
Guru

 
Truth Detector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last Online: Today 10:53 AM
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 3,199
Thanks: 845
Thanked 567 Times in 449 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARealConservative View Post
I think decent conservatives can disagree on the merits of the war.

We should not disagree on the need for a true declaration of war however.

Paul Calls for Congressional Declaration of War against Iraq
The Joint Resolution was the required authorization. UN Security Council resolution 1511 confirms the authority to establish a Democratic Government in Iraq by the coalition forces:

The MNF mandate begins with Security Council Resolution 1511 of October 16, 2003. In spite of the growing evidence of a violent, corrupt and increasingly unpopular occupation, the Council acted again in a way that legitimated the Coalition. This resolution was a tradeoff in which the US and the UK acceded to pressure from France, Germany and others to establish near-term Iraqi political institutions, including a constitution and an elected parliament – in return for the force mandate. It was widely assumed at the time that the occupation would end soon – no later than the establishment of Iraqi political institutions.

The Council has renewed the MNF mandate three times, first with Resolution 1546 (June 8, 2004) which provided a more extensive description of the mandate. The subsequent renewals were adopted under Resolution 1637 (November 11, 2005) and Resolution 1723 (November 28, 2006). The later renewals, given the well-known situation in Iraq, show how unwilling Council members have been to question the US-UK enterprise.


The “Multinational Force” Mandate and Related Security Council Action on Iraq during the Occupation - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum

I am constantly fascinated by the idiotic notion that we need a DIFFERENT type of "declaration." Maybe if more people were better informed and actually READ the documents we wouldn't keep wallowing in such abject denial.

Ron Paul is a whacko who thinks we need to go back to the Gold Standard and be isolationists.

http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf
__________________
Nothing can frighten a Socialist more than the TRUTH; and nothing can frighten Obama more than REALITY
Truth Detector is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-08, 07:04 PM   #93 (permalink)
Advisor
 
John_Gault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Last Online: Today 09:11 AM
Location: Miami/Seattle
Posts: 406
Thanks: 157
Thanked 100 Times in 65 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army:  Is currently a SFC in the US Army. Entered in 2000. 

Current Mood:
Torn
Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Project Vote Smart - American Government, Elections, Candidates and Voting
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraham Lincoln
I believe, if we take habitual drunkards as a class, their heads and their hearts will bear an advantageous comparison with those of any other class. There seems ever to have been a proneness in the brilliant and warm-blooded to fall into this vice. -February 22, 1842, to the Washingtonian Temperance Society, Springfield, Illinois
John_Gault is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-08, 07:13 PM   #94 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: 11-25-08 02:04 PM
Posts: 3,266
Thanks: 239
Thanked 655 Times in 420 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
The Joint Resolution was the required authorization. UN Security Council resolution 1511 confirms the authority to establish a Democratic Government in Iraq by the coalition forces:

The MNF mandate begins with Security Council Resolution 1511 of October 16, 2003. In spite of the growing evidence of a violent, corrupt and increasingly unpopular occupation, the Council acted again in a way that legitimated the Coalition. This resolution was a tradeoff in which the US and the UK acceded to pressure from France, Germany and others to establish near-term Iraqi political institutions, including a constitution and an elected parliament – in return for the force mandate. It was widely assumed at the time that the occupation would end soon – no later than the establishment of Iraqi political institutions.

The Council has renewed the MNF mandate three times, first with Resolution 1546 (June 8, 2004) which provided a more extensive description of the mandate. The subsequent renewals were adopted under Resolution 1637 (November 11, 2005) and Resolution 1723 (November 28, 2006). The later renewals, given the well-known situation in Iraq, show how unwilling Council members have been to question the US-UK enterprise.


The “Multinational Force” Mandate and Related Security Council Action on Iraq during the Occupation - UN Security Council - Global Policy Forum

I am constantly fascinated by the idiotic notion that we need a DIFFERENT type of "declaration." Maybe if more people were better informed and actually READ the documents we wouldn't keep wallowing in such abject denial.

Ron Paul is a whacko who thinks we need to go back to the Gold Standard and be isolationists.

http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf
I said decent conservatives.
ARealConservative is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-08, 08:51 PM   #95 (permalink)
Professor

 
alphieb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 11-05-08 06:03 PM
Location: Vincennes IN
Posts: 1,972
Thanks: 21
Thanked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Current Mood:
Fine
Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

I was for Hillary and I know why now. I can't believe Barak wants tax payers to bailout Wall street, ummm "so does the master of decisions, Bush." The fact that he agrees with Bush should scare everyone.

I will not vote for any of the jokers running for chief.....Biden is OK and that's it....... Sarah Palin thinks she's up to foreign relations because Russia is close to Alaska....and she wears lipstick while being a soccer mom....Geeze, what has our Country come to.....Like Obama's Mentor said....God Damn America.
__________________
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself"--FDR

"Be the Dream"--alphieb

"Failure is the condiment that gives success its flavor". --Truman Capote
alphieb is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-08, 09:06 PM   #96 (permalink)
Moderator
Mod team member

 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Last Online: Today 07:20 AM
Location: New York
Posts: 2,271
Thanks: 718
Thanked 1,356 Times in 787 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphieb View Post
I can't believe Barak wants tax payers to bailout Wall street...
Alphieb,

Even as it might appear that the financial rescue legislation is a "bailout for Wall Street," it is really intended to recapitalize the financial system. The financial system is increasingly strained. Credit is drying up. Interest rates for interbank lending are rising sharply e.g., overnight rates reached as high as 11% in Europe earlier today.

What the political leaders have not communicated very well are the implications of the intensifying credit crisis. Some of those implications are as follows:

• Banks could hoard cash or invest excess cash into Treasurys and cease lending to one another, businesses and individuals.

• Banks that are unable to meet their capital requirements on account of an inability to obtain overnight loans could face failure, especially if depositors learn of the issue and begin withdrawing funds.

• Banks that have a lot of long-term assets relative to short-term liabilities could shift from a profitable position to massive losses on account of the rise in interest costs on short-term borrowing.

• The commercial paper market that is key to financing auto loans, credit cards, etc., is increasingly impaired. That could translate into fewer auto loans, even for people with outstanding credit, higher credit card rates, etc.

• Banks could cease financing lines of credit to companies that often use such lines to finance inventory or meet payroll.

• Banks could exercise "market disruption" clauses that permit them to substantially raise interest rates on funds previously borrowed by corporations. That could increase financial pressures on corporations, reduce corporate investment, and lead to layoffs.

• In a worst-case scenario, the breakdown of money market functionality could trigger a systemic financial crisis. Using systemic crises in developed countries during the 1990s, the mean fiscal cost of such crises (based on % of GDP) came to the equivalent of $1.6 trillion. Economic costs (lost output) came to 1.5 to 2.0 times that figure.

All said, even as the political leaders haven't communicated very effectively on the legislation, the bill is intended to prevent a systemic financial crisis. It is intended to protect all Americans from the destructive consequences of such a crisis.
donsutherland1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to donsutherland1 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-05-08, 06:41 AM   #97 (permalink)
User
 
neilsimon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Online: 10-16-08 09:14 PM
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Thanks for sharing this. Google's not coming up with straight-up answers to my queries.
__________________
Political discussion over @ The Jabber.
neilsimon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-08, 01:42 PM   #98 (permalink)
Guru

 
Truth Detector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last Online: Today 10:53 AM
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 3,199
Thanks: 845
Thanked 567 Times in 449 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by ARealConservative View Post
I said decent conservatives.
Ad hominem; Carry on.
Truth Detector is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-08, 01:47 PM   #99 (permalink)
Guru

 
Truth Detector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last Online: Today 10:53 AM
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 3,199
Thanks: 845
Thanked 567 Times in 449 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphieb View Post
....... Sarah Palin thinks she's up to foreign relations because Russia is close to Alaska....and she wears lipstick while being a soccer mom....Geeze, what has our Country come to.....Like Obama's Mentor said....God Damn America.
Obama thinks he is up to foreign relations because he has traveled overseas and given speeches.

It’s telling that you agree with Reverend Wright and Obama’s hate of America as well.

Carry on. I am looking forward to the idea of an Obama Presidency and huge majority of Democrats in the House and Senate. They won’t be able to lie to the American people and blame Republicans this time and America will see them for the despicable lying pile of refuse the Democrats in Washington have truly become.

Yes, folks, I am almost tempted to vote Democrat myself so that we can guarantee this new vast majority in Washington and end the blame game once and for all so that Americans can see what a steaming pile of **** they have gotten themselves into.

Perhaps then, the memory of the collective citizens will last beyond the first month of 9-11.

Truth Detector is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-08, 01:52 PM   #100 (permalink)
Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Online: 11-07-08 01:13 PM
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 1,789
Thanks: 306
Thanked 393 Times in 288 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Re: Where do the candidates stand on the issues - A guide for 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
Obama thinks he is up to foreign relations because he has traveled overseas and given speeches.
Not that this means a whole lot, but there is clearly more than you are representing...

"He then transferred to Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations"

Its not as though he got his expertise from being in close proximity to Russia.
He actually studied International Relations and graduated top of his class.

McCain studied how to fly a plane, and Palin studied how to be a weather reporter.
__________________
"We are all Georgians". No Mr. McCain, We are all Americans.

Last edited by John1234 : 10-05-08 at 01:53 PM.
John1234 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO