• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Scott Walker Said to Be Quitting Presidential Race

Pretty good article:

9 things I learned about Scott Walker on the campaign trail — and why they mattered.

1) It was unclear exactly why Walker wanted to be president.
Walker has only been the governor of Wisconsin for four and a half years, following more than eight years as the Milwaukee County executive. Yet unlike many young governors, he had a strong national profile — along with the admiration of many wealthy Republican donors — because of the dramatic, highly publicized battle he waged against his state's public-sector unions in 2011, soon after becoming governor. In severely weakening those unions and then winning a recall election, Walker earned the support of fiscal conservatives and the tea party, and angered liberals around the country.

So with a seemingly wide-open presidential primary, it made sense for Walker to run, pitching himself as a Republican loathed by Democrats who has had success in beating them. But Walker often seemed to struggle to explain exactly why he would be a better president than the other Republicans running. He seemed to write much of his domestic and foreign policy as he went along, rather than coming to the race with a clear vision of where he would take the country. For many voters who are often tired of uncompromising career politicians and gridlock in Washington, perhaps Walker's promise to fight Democrats just wasn't enough.

snip----------------

3) For an everyman candidate, his campaign events were often elaborately staged.
In late July, Walker held a town hall at a family-style restaurant in Red Oak, a town with fewer than 6,000 residents in western Iowa. An advance team with a moving van of equipment arrived hours early to hang up flags, set up a sound system and arrange a stage with tiered seating to provide a backdrop of Iowans. Walker arrived with a large entourage: his security detail, campaign manager, personal aide, full-time campaign photographer, two Iowa-based staffers and a horde of low-level employees who handed out brochures. As he spoke for roughly an hour, one man on the stage had to shield his eyes from a bright spotlight.

That's the level of staging that Walker enjoyed during nearly every campaign stop during his first month on the trail — which worried some supporters, who considered the elaborate set-ups a waste of money so early in the campaign. These glitzy events seemed more suited to a candidate who had already locked down the nomination, but they matched Walker's forceful confidence — he truly considered himself a front-runner who could win over most voters in most states.

continued---------



9 things I learned about Scott Walker on the campaign trail — and why they mattered - The Washington Post
 
Quick question for the group, this came up from a conversation with a friend yesterday.

Would it be fair to say that Scott Walker ended up dropping out because he failed going up against more seasoned or better prepared politicians (and one complete outsider in Trump that refuses to be a politician?)
 
The entire GOP crop is a failure when it comes to the general election, not just walker.

As for the GOP primary race, graham, jindal, santorum are all polling worse than walker, yet they haven't quit. So there's something walker isn't talking about.

wait who is running for the democrats again?

a socialist and a known liar?

wow you guys are the emblem of everything good huh :lamo

Hillary is losing support left and right.
 
Quick question for the group, this came up from a conversation with a friend yesterday.

Would it be fair to say that Scott Walker ended up dropping out because he failed going up against more seasoned or better prepared politicians (and one complete outsider in Trump that refuses to be a politician?)

well he suspended his campaign he is still on the ballot.
however he boomed out of the gate but then lost the momentum when trump showed up.

he couldn't get back in the light after that and trump was just a wrecking ball.
 
Quick question for the group, this came up from a conversation with a friend yesterday.

Would it be fair to say that Scott Walker ended up dropping out because he failed going up against more seasoned or better prepared politicians (and one complete outsider in Trump that refuses to be a politician?)

I think Walker had a great deal of issues, including trying to run a one-state campaign while trying to pay for a much larger staff.

But to the extent that Walker was forced out by the other candidates, I think the blame can rest primarily with Trump. Walker was leading or competing for the lead in national polls as well as in Iowa up until the point when Trump made his surge into the front of the pack. The tends to show that most of Walker's supporters were looking for an outsider that was conservative and uncompromising. It also tends to show that most of Walker's supporters were bandwagon supporters. When Trump checked all of those boxes as well as making some absurdist and unapologetic comments that forced the vast majority of media attention to Trump, the supporters of Walker moved on.
 
Last edited:
Quick question for the group, this came up from a conversation with a friend yesterday.

Would it be fair to say that Scott Walker ended up dropping out because he failed going up against more seasoned or better prepared politicians (and one complete outsider in Trump that refuses to be a politician?)

"Seasoned" ? "Better prepared" ? :lamo

Winning on the GOP ticket is EASY. All one has to do is make a bunch of silly xenophobic/racist comments that appeal to the red state voters' childish bigotries.

PROOF: the above is all Trump is doing, and he's winning

The fact that walker failed to do even that just means that he's dumber than a piece of gravel.
 
So you believe that walker would not seek out an extra-marital affair w/a younger woman if an opportunity to do so was available to him?

Or do you believe that he would but had no such opportunities?

Because at least one of those conditions would have to be false for him not to have an affair.

I think it's possible that there are candidates who love their spouses and are loyal. Your malevolent projections just make others shake their heads. I'd be embarrassed for you if I thought for even a second that you were serious.
 
"Seasoned" ? "Better prepared" ? :lamo

Winning on the GOP ticket is EASY. All one has to do is make a bunch of silly xenophobic/racist comments that appeal to the red state voters' childish bigotries.

PROOF: the above is all Trump is doing, and he's winning

The fact that walker failed to do even that just means that he's dumber than a piece of gravel.

you pretty much summed up every single liberal argument there is.
 
which shows how pathetic people really are that they would even considering voting for them.
and well Hillary is losing support.

it shows that democrats have really nothing to offer.

They do: victory
 
I think it's possible that there are candidates who love their spouses and are loyal.

Only if the spouses are sufficiently attractive.

Your malevolent projections just make others shake their heads. I'd be embarrassed for you if I thought for even a second that you were serious.

Wonder why the ones who are duped into believing walker's stated reasons for quitting consider themselves to be "serious."
 
Only if the spouses are sufficiently attractive.

So basically, if YOU think a GOP politician's spouse isn't "sufficiently attractive," then they must be cheating.

What a ridiculously stupid argument.
 
So basically, if YOU think a GOP politician's spouse isn't "sufficiently attractive," then they must be cheating.

What a ridiculously stupid argument.

a strange example of a woman objectifying herself; 'if i'm not hot, my hubby will cheat', and projecting that insecurity onto everyone who is not a democrat.
 
Back
Top Bottom