Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Supreme Recursion

  1. #1
    User
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1

    Supreme Recursion

    Dear Debate Politics Members,

    Both California and "United States of America" seem claiming republic status.

    Wondering how two peoples and two representative sets may both claim supreme power.

    With regard,

    Anthony Brian Mallgren

  2. #2
    Guru

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    In the Land of Fruits and Nuts
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    3,844

    Re: Supreme Recursion

    Califirnia isn't going anywhere. They just have trouble accepting adversity that is not of their own making.

    BTW, welcome to D.P.!
    We will all soon be stuck like bugs on the grill of Big Data.
    It's hard to match the burning, visceral hate a liberal can bring to bear.

  3. #3
    Renaissance Man
    Captain Adverse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Mid-West USA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    7,068

    Re: Supreme Recursion

    Quote Originally Posted by Latium View Post
    Dear Debate Politics Members,

    Both California and "United States of America" seem claiming republic status.

    Wondering how two peoples and two representative sets may both claim supreme power.

    With regard,

    Anthony Brian Mallgren
    They don't, in the case of California "Republic" is just a term of usage within the State. The official name is the State of California. Technically they are sovereign within their State borders, but subordinate to the Federal government for national policy, etc. It comes from the short history of the existence of California as a Republic:

    The California Republic was a short-lived, unrecognized breakaway state that, for twenty-five days in 1846, militarily controlled the area to the north of the San Francisco Bay in the present-day state of California.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Republic

    It's similar to a Texan saying he is from the Republic of Texas.

    On March 1, 1836 the Convention of 1836 came to order, and the next day declared independence from Mexico, establishing the Republic of Texas. On October 13, 1845, a large majority of voters in the republic approved both the American offer and the proposed constitution that specifically endorsed slavery and emigrants bringing slaves to Texas.[29] This constitution was later accepted by the US Congress, making Texas a US state on the same day annexation took effect, December 29, 1845.
    Texas had just under 10 years of Independence before becoming a U.S. State.

    Other States call themselves other things like the Commonwealth of New York.
    Last edited by Captain Adverse; 12-17-16 at 10:29 PM.
    If I stop responding it doesn't mean I've conceded the point or agree with you. It only means I've made my point and I don't mind you having the last word. Please wait a few minutes before "quoting" me. I often correct errors for a minute or two after I post before the final product is ready.

  4. #4
    Professor Brewdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Last Seen
    04-11-17 @ 01:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,870

    Re: Supreme Recursion

    I guess I don't understand the question. California can't call themselves a republic? Why not? They have a constitution and a representative legislature that upholds it.
    ďTravel isnít always pretty. It isnít always comfortable. Sometimes it hurts, it even breaks your heart. But thatís okay. The journey changes you; it should change you. It leaves marks on your memory, on your consciousness, on your heart, and on your body. You take something with you. Hopefully, you leave something good behind.Ē -Anthony Bourdain

  5. #5
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 01:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,097

    Re: Supreme Recursion

    At one time in america states were actually republics, however that is no longer true.

    Why you may ask, because today referendums and the electoral process within a state is democratic, where it once was not.

    The states have been turned into democratic forms by the people and the USSC.

  6. #6
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:32 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    26,558

    Re: Supreme Recursion

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Adverse View Post
    They don't, in the case of California "Republic" is just a term of usage within the State. The official name is the State of California. Technically they are sovereign within their State borders, but subordinate to the Federal government for national policy, etc. It comes from the short history of the existence of California as a Republic:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Republic

    It's similar to a Texan saying he is from the Republic of Texas.



    Texas had just under 10 years of Independence before becoming a U.S. State.

    Other States call themselves other things like the Commonwealth of New York.
    Additionally, Vermont was an independent republic before joining the Union, and Hawaii was an independent kingdom.
    If you feel a need to "reinterpret" the Constitution, you must know that what you want to do is unconstitutional.
    "AND WHEN THE LAST LAW WAS DOWN, AND THE DEVIL TURNED 'ROUND ON YOU, WHERE WOULD YOU HIDE, ROPER, THE LAWS ALL BEING FLAT?"


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •