This is what you were asked:
What? You can't do it?
The quoted posted asked:
Please deliver to us, if you will, the text of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause.
Thank you in advance.
Be a man, post it.
====================
You could not answer. That much is clear.
i was very clear, but in you attempt to TRY TO FIND FAULT YOU FAILED.
i asked you the question.
i provided the answer, the federal government [ congress ] cannot nullify state law, the people of a state just don't like, the people would have to make court challenge to get the law, stuck down, via the court,...not by a legisltiure.
Supremacy Clause MEANING
Any federal system needs a strategy for dealing with potential conflicts between the national and local governments. There are at least three strategies available. First, each government could be given exclusive jurisdiction over its respective sphere, which would, at least in theory, avoid altogether the possibility of direct conflict. Second, the governments could have concurrent jurisdiction, but one government could be given power to veto actions of the other, either in the event of actual conflict or in general classes of cases. Third, both governments could be allowed to act without mutual interference, but one government's acts could be given primacy over the other's acts in the event of actual conflict.
The Supremacy Clause embodies the third strategy. It is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with national law. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that "[e]very state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them."
the Supremacy Clause does not authorize congress to nullify JUST any state law
Day-by-Day Summary of the Convention | Teaching American History
MAY 31ST 1787
The other clauses, giving powers necessary to preserve harmony among the States,
to negative all State laws contravening, in the opinion of the National Legislature, the Articles of Union, down to the last clause, (the words, “or any treaties subsisting under the authority of the Union,” being added after the words “contravening, &c. the Articles of the Union,” on motion of Doctor FRANKLIN) were agreed to without debate or dissent.
The last clause of the sixth Resolution, authorizing an exertion of the force of the whole against a delinquent State, came next into consideration.
Mr. MADISON observed, that the more he reflected on the use of force, the more he doubted the practicability, the justice and the efficacy of it, when applied to people collectively, and not individually. An union of the States containing such an ingredient seemed to provide for its own destruction. The use of force against a State would look more like a declaration of war than an infliction of punishment; and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolution of all previous compacts by which it might be bound. He hoped that such a system would be framed as might render this resource unnecessary, and moved that the clause be postponed. This motion was agreed to, nem. con.
The Committee then rose, and the House adjourned.
POWER TO NEGATIVE STATE LAWS IN DENIED!
