- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,207
- Reaction score
- 2,615
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Are you going to answer the question?
Stop being obtuse. I answered the question. You asked what fact. I specified.
Are you going to answer the question?
Stop being obtuse. I answered the question. You asked what fact. I specified.
There is a difference between doing something and not doing something.
What specific physical fact do you dispute?
You did not answer.
So as long as you don't have a hand in it evil is fine? Nice cop-out. :roll:
Have a nice day.
That is not what I said.
Not doing evil is only the beginning of virtue
Oh jesus ****ing christ. Why do I bother. :lamo
Have a nice day.
You people never cease to amaze me. I make an offhand quip to Brewer (stating only the fact that people can't be preserved on ventilators indefinitely), and it set you off on your anti-God rant. For the record, I'm not going to discuss my position on capital punishment in this thread because it's completely besides the point. If you want me to discuss capital punishment, start a thread about it.
No, you avoided the question. You will let multiple innocent children die for the benefit of the one. That is evil.
Just admit it. I will. Even though it is evil I would never harm the one to save the many. I am not afraid, why are you?
You are the one who brought God into the conversation, not me,
God exists and people believe in him. Get over it.
People interpret the Bible and practice their faith in a variety of ways. I respect that. Do you respect that folks can be faithful to God and not interpret the Bible in the same way as you do? I believe in God, by the way.
Again, after over three decades of critical care nursing....I have never met a member of the clergy that have advised against removal of life support or against organ donation. I am curious - does your clergy advise against organ donation or removal of life support?
The clergy I have encountered over the years seem to "get" and accept brain death as death.
I am curious, is your lack of acceptance of brain death an individual thing or does your church teach this?
This. Thread. Is. Not. About. My. Religion.
Just to be clear, before we proceed, are you being deliberately obtuse, or do you legitimately not understand?
If it was deliberate it would not be obtuse... and yes, I understand the point that you are trying to make the problem is that it is not logical.
If you think there's no difference between action and inaction, you really should substantiate that.
If you think there's no difference between action and inaction, you really should substantiate that.
If God commanded you to sacrifice your own son, who happened to be verifiably neurologically dead, so that another's child may live, would you do so? In a way is that not what God Himself did? That would argue against condemning the parents. I could maybe understand your condemnation of the people doing the actual transplant, but is that any worse than Abraham being willing to personally kill his own son for no reason beyond being told to? It is indeed different from the evil acts committed against God's own son, yet Jesus begged for his killers' forgiveness.
You argue that there is a significant difference between inaction and action. That, somehow, actively taking a brain dead person's organs and ceasing their bodily functions is an act more evil than doing nothing and letting two people die.
If God is your example, he purposefully sent his son to die. While God may not have held the knife that killed His son, He certainly planned for it to happen and took action to ensure that it did.