Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Political forums > Sex and Sexuality

Sex and Sexuality Theory of Gayativity; Originally Posted by rivrrat Well that must be nice to be able to CHOOSE who you're attracted to. God ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-08, 10:45 PM   #121 (permalink)
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Online: 06-17-08 11:02 PM
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
Well that must be nice to be able to CHOOSE who you're attracted to. God knows I've certainly wished a hundred times NOT to be attracted to someone, or wished a hundred times that I WAS attracted to someone, but it's just not possible for me (or probably %99.9999999 of the people in the world) to control who I am attracted to.

So good for you. You accomplished something (supposedly) that the vast majority of the population cannot do and most have probably wished they could at some point in their life.
Yea, I was fortunate to be able to deal with my OCD and sexuality problems fairly early in life. I still kind of feel uncomfortable getting close to guys friendship wise, but I'm not sexually attracted to men anymore.(not sure if my attraction was more OCD or whatever, but I do know i was attracted to men and now I'm not) But yea I really feel for people who have sexual attractions they don't want, its very frustrating and demeaning to your sense of self.
Robear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 06-17-08, 10:54 PM   #122 (permalink)
Sage

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Online: Today 03:12 AM
Posts: 7,079
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 2,060 Times in 1,370 Posts
Gender: Female

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robear View Post
Yea, I was fortunate to be able to deal with my OCD and sexuality problems fairly early in life. I still kind of feel uncomfortable getting close to guys friendship wise, but I'm not sexually attracted to men anymore.(not sure if my attraction was more OCD or whatever, but I do know i was attracted to men and now I'm not) But yea I really feel for people who have sexual attractions they don't want, its very frustrating and demeaning to your sense of self.
Not demeaning at all. Why would it be demeaning to be attracted to someone?

It can be frustrating and sad when they don't return the attraction, and that's when you really wish you weren't attracted to them. But, there's just not turning it "off". There is only diverting your attention elsewhere. Heartbreak is a painful thing, but I don't think there's any "medication" or "treatment" for it. You can't just turn your feelings off.

Somehow I doubt that medication could make me NOT attracted to my BF anymore. Or could have made me attracted to other people that I DONT find attractive at all. Unless it's a hallucinogen or something. Or I was brainwashed.

I don't think there's any amount of medication in the world that could make me NOT find Angelina Jolie or Colin Farrel attractive.

Likewise, I don't think there's any medication in the world that could make me find say... George Bush attractive. Or, Roseanne Barr.
__________________

Last edited by rivrrat : 06-17-08 at 10:56 PM.
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 12:11 AM   #123 (permalink)
Professor

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 07:52 PM
Posts: 1,660
Thanks: 914
Thanked 638 Times in 386 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Marines:   

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Not demeaning at all. Why would it be demeaning to be attracted to someone?

It can be frustrating and sad when they don't return the attraction, and that's when you really wish you weren't attracted to them. But, there's just not turning it "off". There is only diverting your attention elsewhere. Heartbreak is a painful thing, but I don't think there's any "medication" or "treatment" for it. You can't just turn your feelings off.

Somehow I doubt that medication could make me NOT attracted to my BF anymore. Or could have made me attracted to other people that I DONT find attractive at all. Unless it's a hallucinogen or something. Or I was brainwashed.

I don't think there's any amount of medication in the world that could make me NOT find Angelina Jolie or Colin Farrel attractive.

Likewise, I don't think there's any medication in the world that could make me find say... George Bush attractive. Or, Roseanne Barr.
Has the matter re-opened? I believe there are a multitude of my points you and the genetic homosexuality crowd (Mach, Kali, Quat, Rathi) has left unadressed. I simply assumed it was due to your collective inability to rebutt my arguments; perhaps I am mistaken...perhaps.
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 12:16 AM   #124 (permalink)
Sage

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Online: Today 03:12 AM
Posts: 7,079
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 2,060 Times in 1,370 Posts
Gender: Female

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Has the matter re-opened? I believe there are a multitude of my points you and the genetic homosexuality crowd (Mach, Kali, Quat, Rathi) has left unadressed. I simply assumed it was due to your collective inability to rebutt my arguments; perhaps I am mistaken...perhaps.
What are you talking about? What was left unaddressed? The fact that no one I know of except this one anonymous individual on a forum has ever chosen who they are attracted to?

Do you CHOOSE who you are attracted to? Could I point to any person on the face of the earth and you would be able to CHOOSE to be attracted to them? Is that seriously what you're suggesting?

If you have a life partner at the moment, could you just choose NOT to be attracted to them any longer? Did you choose to BE attracted to them? If so, why on earth did you do so?
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 12:39 AM   #125 (permalink)
Professor

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 07:52 PM
Posts: 1,660
Thanks: 914
Thanked 638 Times in 386 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Marines:   

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
What are you talking about? What was left unaddressed? The fact that no one I know of except this one anonymous individual on a forum has ever chosen who they are attracted to?

Do you CHOOSE who you are attracted to? Could I point to any person on the face of the earth and you would be able to CHOOSE to be attracted to them? Is that seriously what you're suggesting?

If you have a life partner at the moment, could you just choose NOT to be attracted to them any longer? Did you choose to BE attracted to them? If so, why on earth did you do so?
I assumed it was a contextual continuation of the previous debate over genetic homosexuality, if, however, you're specifically limiting your contention to preferences within interrelationships I will not contest it.

As for unadressed points simply scroll back through the last three pages or so and you'll find numerous posts of mine went unadressed.
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 02:37 AM   #126 (permalink)
Sage

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Online: Today 03:12 AM
Posts: 7,079
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 2,060 Times in 1,370 Posts
Gender: Female

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
I assumed it was a contextual continuation of the previous debate over genetic homosexuality, if, however, you're specifically limiting your contention to preferences within interrelationships I will not contest it.

As for unadressed points simply scroll back through the last three pages or so and you'll find numerous posts of mine went unadressed.
My contention isn't "limited" at all. I consider the choice (or lack thereof) to be attracted to a specific individual as laughable as the choice (or lack thereof) to be attracted to a specific gender. How can you separate the two? Do people choose to prefer redheads? Or blondes? Tall men? Or short women? Anorexic thin? Or voluptuous? People don't CHOOSE these preferences or attractions any more than they choose which gender they find attractive. So, it's hardly limited.
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 09:08 AM   #127 (permalink)
Middleground's Pimp
 
Gipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Online: 11-01-08 09:11 AM
Location: Ala-f'n-bama
Posts: 1,600
Thanks: 136
Thanked 347 Times in 248 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Woot
Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
I don't think there's any amount of medication in the world that could make me NOT find Angelina Jolie or Colin Farrel attractive.
Try corrective eye surgery.
__________________
A government big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. - Barry Goldwater
Gipper is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 11:32 AM   #128 (permalink)
Professor

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 07:52 PM
Posts: 1,660
Thanks: 914
Thanked 638 Times in 386 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Marines:   

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
My contention isn't "limited" at all. I consider the choice (or lack thereof) to be attracted to a specific individual as laughable as the choice (or lack thereof) to be attracted to a specific gender. How can you separate the two? Do people choose to prefer redheads? Or blondes? Tall men? Or short women? Anorexic thin? Or voluptuous? People don't CHOOSE these preferences or attractions any more than they choose which gender they find attractive. So, it's hardly limited.
Simple question. Are you contuing the previous debate or not? I answered your initial question and you've yet to rebutt it. I'm not going to resume the debate on new terms and within a different context simply because you find my answer to difficult too adress.
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 01:01 PM   #129 (permalink)
Sage

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Online: Today 03:12 AM
Posts: 7,079
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 2,060 Times in 1,370 Posts
Gender: Female

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Simple question. Are you contuing the previous debate or not? I answered your initial question and you've yet to rebutt it. I'm not going to resume the debate on new terms and within a different context simply because you find my answer to difficult too adress.
What are you talking about?
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-08, 01:01 PM   #130 (permalink)
Sage

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Online: Today 03:12 AM
Posts: 7,079
Thanks: 1,433
Thanked 2,060 Times in 1,370 Posts
Gender: Female

Re: Theory of Gayativity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gipper View Post
Try corrective eye surgery.
For what? To NOT find Colin attractive? I'd have to deafen myself too because his Irish accent makes me melt.
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-sexuality/30452-theory-gayativity.html
Posted By For Type Date
  Living With an Alcoholic 9th April 2008 by Health Tips This thread Pingback 04-15-08 12:03 AM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ernesto "Che" Guevara Dragonfly Archives 123 12-12-07 10:58 AM
Greetings from Idiot America - Go Saddle Up Your Dinosaur danarhea Archives 41 11-30-07 08:28 AM
Should Intelligent Weather Theory be taught in schools? OnionCollection Archives 15 11-17-05 02:54 PM
Quantum Theory Disproven? danarhea Archives 22 11-08-05 12:16 AM
Evolution a Theory galenrox Archives 599 09-03-05 05:45 AM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
1010 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO