Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity; Atheist liberal insanity at it's finest(sarcasm).This is why a liberal is bad regardless of what letter he ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-08, 05:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Sage

 
jamesrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 11:02 PM
Posts: 6,765
Thanks: 572
Thanked 475 Times in 336 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army:  Served honerably in the US Army from Mar. 00 through Mar. 03 

Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Atheist liberal insanity at it's finest(sarcasm).This is why a liberal is bad regardless of what letter he has next to his name.

Just the facts on SB 777 - North County Times / The Californian - On Notice - Just the facts on SB 777
Forget everything you learned in kindergarten about the difference between boys and girls. According to Gov. Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature, schoolchildren can now choose their own sex. I'm not talking about choosing "sexual behavior or sexual preferences." Kids are going to be taught that they have the right to completely ignore their physical anatomy and choose the status of being "male" or "female."

Ignore your common sense, ignore your chromosomes and ignore your anatomy. This is what your politicians want to teach your kids in school. After all, California's kids have mastered reading, writing and arithmetic, haven't they? In October, California Senate Bill 777 was signed into law. Senate Bill 777 eliminates Education Code 212, which currently defines "sex" as "the biological condition or quality of being a male or female human being." And worse yet, SB 777 redefines the term "gender" for all schoolchildren by adding Education Code 210.7, which will read: "'Gender' means sex, and includes a person's gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person's assigned sex at birth." In short, this redefinition of gender states that you are what you choose to be regardless of your anatomical make-up.

SB 777 also uses this redefinition of gender to forbid educators from discriminating against any individual employee, student or other person based upon that individual's unspoken claim of being male or female, regardless of his or her actual sex.
__________________

Check out this forum
jamesrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 01-02-08, 12:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Today 02:04 AM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 20,216
Thanks: 4,516
Thanked 2,773 Times in 1,994 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
Atheist liberal insanity at it's finest(sarcasm).This is why a liberal is bad regardless of what letter he has next to his name.

Just the facts on SB 777 - North County Times / The Californian - On Notice - Just the facts on SB 777
Forget everything you learned in kindergarten about the difference between boys and girls. According to Gov. Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature, schoolchildren can now choose their own sex. I'm not talking about choosing "sexual behavior or sexual preferences." Kids are going to be taught that they have the right to completely ignore their physical anatomy and choose the status of being "male" or "female."

Ignore your common sense, ignore your chromosomes and ignore your anatomy. This is what your politicians want to teach your kids in school. After all, California's kids have mastered reading, writing and arithmetic, haven't they? In October, California Senate Bill 777 was signed into law. Senate Bill 777 eliminates Education Code 212, which currently defines "sex" as "the biological condition or quality of being a male or female human being." And worse yet, SB 777 redefines the term "gender" for all schoolchildren by adding Education Code 210.7, which will read: "'Gender' means sex, and includes a person's gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person's assigned sex at birth." In short, this redefinition of gender states that you are what you choose to be regardless of your anatomical make-up.

SB 777 also uses this redefinition of gender to forbid educators from discriminating against any individual employee, student or other person based upon that individual's unspoken claim of being male or female, regardless of his or her actual sex.
How many times is your ilk going to misrepresent this bill? Someone! Please! Burn a flag or something.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 08:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
Advisor
 
Gunface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 12:05 AM
Location: It's round on the ends and high in the middle
Posts: 323
Thanks: 74
Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

I love how you're a goldmine of comedy like that. You'll say something along the lines of "just the facts" and then something blatantly unfactual like "this why a liberal is bad no matter..." and "more liberal insanity". I'm not sure if it's because you don't know how to present something without your personal agenda seeping in, or if it's because you just won't try.
Either way, your facade of pretending to be unbiased when you obviously aren't is incredibly irritating.
__________________
昏昏愕愕爱过又算什么
贪图快乐等于堕落
你说一生不是为爱而活...
Gunface is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 10:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
Sage

 
jamesrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 11:02 PM
Posts: 6,765
Thanks: 572
Thanked 475 Times in 336 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Army:  Served honerably in the US Army from Mar. 00 through Mar. 03 

Thread Starter Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunface View Post
I love how you're a goldmine of comedy like that. You'll say something along the lines of "just the facts" and then something blatantly unfactual like "this why a liberal is bad no matter..." and "more liberal insanity". I'm not sure if it's because you don't know how to present something without your personal agenda seeping in, or if it's because you just won't try.
A liberal is bad regardless if he is a democrat,republican,independent or whatever.


Quote:
Either way, your facade of pretending to be unbiased when you obviously aren't is incredibly irritating.
I am not unbiased nor did I claim to be unbiased.Everyone is biased.
jamesrage is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 01:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Advisor
 
Gunface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 12:05 AM
Location: It's round on the ends and high in the middle
Posts: 323
Thanks: 74
Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
A liberal is bad regardless if he is a democrat,republican,independent or whatever.




I am not unbiased nor did I claim to be unbiased.Everyone is biased.
O_o Then why should anyone trust anything you have to say, if you can't say it without giving it a significant spin in your direction?
Gunface is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 03:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Conservative Independent

 
DarkWizard12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 10:40 PM
Location: Tyler TX
Posts: 2,876
Thanks: 1,469
Thanked 458 Times in 341 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Because everyone is biased and if we can't listen to a biased person, who can we listen to?
DarkWizard12 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 08:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Right behind you!
 
Edify_Always_In_All_Ways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 10:29 PM
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 961
Thanks: 153
Thanked 189 Times in 124 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Bored
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Wow, deja vu.

Why do you care? Are there really kids somewhere who will decide on a whim to change genders- and not change back? Kids do what feels right. When puberty hits, those who weren't actually transsexual will learn the truth real fast. Besides, I don't see any part of the bill requiring teachers to tell kids about the choice- they won't be forced to ignore their common sense.

Speaking of common sense, maybe you should try to stock up on some.
__________________
The flamethrower- proof that someone was thinking "I want to set that guy on fire, but I'm not close enough."
Edify_Always_In_All_Ways is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 09:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Advisor
 
Gunface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 12:05 AM
Location: It's round on the ends and high in the middle
Posts: 323
Thanks: 74
Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cloud_9
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkWizard12 View Post
Because everyone is biased and if we can't listen to a biased person, who can we listen to?
Everyone is biased, sure. But you can still present information without bias.

Instead of portraying it in an unbiased way and thinking "Hmm, why would they do that?" James starts out with the assumption "bad liberals" and takes it from there. It's typical of him, but it's still kind of depressing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edify_Always_In_All_Ways View Post
Wow, deja vu.

Why do you care? Are there really kids somewhere who will decide on a whim to change genders- and not change back? Kids do what feels right. When puberty hits, those who weren't actually transsexual will learn the truth real fast. Besides, I don't see any part of the bill requiring teachers to tell kids about the choice- they won't be forced to ignore their common sense.

Speaking of common sense, maybe you should try to stock up on some.
I'm sorry, you're wrong. James knows these things and you're just in the dark. He IS an expert on the sexualities of little kids, after all.
Gunface is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-02-08, 09:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
anti-ideological

 
The silenced majority's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 11:14 PM
Posts: 2,554
Thanks: 728
Thanked 702 Times in 452 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Lurking
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

Ah yes, another thread on California sb777.


Is anyone going to finally point to some specific cases of structural discrimination against homosexuals and the transgendered going on in the California public schools that would have created the need for such a bill?

Or are we just going to go down the same old "what do you have against gay people" road?
__________________
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”. ~ Samuel Adams
The silenced majority is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 01-03-08, 09:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
blond bombshell

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 08:13 PM
Location: uk
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 263
Thanked 463 Times in 353 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sassy
Re: Just the facts on SB 777:more liberal insanity

It doesent really matter what the law says kids are gonna act how their gender is.
__________________
The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking.
mikhail is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Middleground
· · ·
Member Galleries
1010 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO