• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is remaining a virgin till marriage possible.

yeah, I was briefly in a relationship after them with a girl who 19 (i'm 22) and turned out to be too immature and not ready for an actual relationship, so that kinda sucked. But I continue to be resolute and oblivious to danger!

Well, that's how you're supposed to be at 22. Talk to me when you're 42. LOL
 
That eldest Duggar boy didn't even kiss his wife until they were married. :shock:
 
Another great thing is if she is 42, than her boobs will probably be bigger than a 22 yearold's too.

Personally, I'm not the biggest fan of big boobs. A nice C is perfect for me. Any bigger than maybe D, there's just too much, and it's too shapeless
 
Please excuse me while I vomit.
 
Personally, I'm not the biggest fan of big boobs. A nice C is perfect for me. Any bigger than maybe D, there's just too much, and it's too shapeless

Yeah, I call that the "Uniboob Syndrome".
Women with big boobs- and I mean anything larger than a B- really can't wear a lot of things, because they look all dumpy and like they've got one giant boob that goes all the way across.
 
Agreed; this is true of virtually all young men, in my experience, and many- though not all- older men.
I don't know if older men develop more self-control, or their libido decreases, or some combination of the two, but at least some of them are capable of turning down sex, on occasion.
Young men? Not so much.

Having an intimate understanding of this fact has led me to have more realistic expectations of marriage than I believe some of my cohorts have.
I hooked up, by chance or by design (likely some of both), with a guy who has comparatively little interest in sex.
I find that to be a positive attribute in a husband, because most of the time, except for random weird episodes, I have scant interest in sex also. So we're compatible.
And even so, I don't fool myself into believing that he could be trusted to remain monogamous under any circumstances.
All men are weak when it comes to sex. It's virtually universal.
There are circumstances in which virtually any man would cheat on his wife.
Some men encounter those circumstances far more often than others.
A good husband is one who tries to avoid ending up in a position where he's likely to cheat.
A bad husband actively seeks out such opportunities.
That's what I know about men and sex.
Others' opinions may vary.

If you understand that, then why ask for monogamy at all? Yeah I know it would suck to get an STD but he could use protection.

Of course it's possible. I find it disheartening that so many people I talk to think everyone has sex outside of marriage and it's "impossible" to wait. You obviously need to expand your horizons.

And I think it's just not worth it to wait. Though I should have been much more careful when I was 16.
 
If you understand that, then why ask for monogamy at all? Yeah I know it would suck to get an STD but he could use protection.


It's a nice ideal.
If he wants to have sex with someone else, he can; we both have in the past, when we were younger.
At this point in our lives, we prefer not, because 1. it often brings about some sort of weird drama, and 2. the STD issue.

There are a number of STDs that it is not really possible to protect oneself against, since they are spread via skin-to-skin contact rather than via bodily fluids.
 
It's a nice ideal.
If he wants to have sex with someone else, he can; we both have in the past, when we were younger.
At this point in our lives, we prefer not, because 1. it often brings about some sort of weird drama, and 2. the STD issue.

There are a number of STDs that it is not really possible to protect oneself against, since they are spread via skin-to-skin contact rather than via bodily fluids.

oh yeah like crabs.
flowers.jpg


My fiancee and I have stated that we would rather share each other than lose each other, but that we'd frankly rather not know about it if it happens unless it calls into question the viability of the relationship itself.
 
oh yeah like crabs.
flowers.jpg

And herpes.
And HPV, the virus which causes cervical cancer in females.

My fiancee and I have stated that we would rather share each other than lose each other, but that we'd frankly rather not know about it if it happens unless it calls into question the viability of the relationship itself.


Like I said, it's always some weird drama when you stray outside your marriage for sex. You have feelings, your wife has feelings, and the other people you guys would be screwing have feelings too. And everybody has motivations, and sometimes those motivations come into conflict with one another, and then minor hell breaks loose.
Trashy, Jerry-Springer hell.

In my experience, a committed, life-long relationship in which anything other than monogamy is the ultimate goal just doesn't work.
The only people I've known it to work for, even in the short term, are swingers, who swing together with other couples and have all these elaborate rules governing their swinging behavior.
I've never been remotely interested in all that.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I call that the "Uniboob Syndrome".
Women with big boobs- and I mean anything larger than a B- really can't wear a lot of things, because they look all dumpy and like they've got one giant boob that goes all the way across.
As opposed to scrawny chicks who look like men.
 
Back
Top Bottom