Wessexman

But I don't care about being called on it. I admitted to it. I simply disagreed with you, who incidently are my opponent in a heated discussion, that my partisanship is bad for my arguments.


They are well known for it. But evidence abounds on this site. Look at half of Hateuy's posts if you don't believe me.

Here is an interesting article on it.

Hot Air Blog Archive Krauthammer: Racism “last refuge of the liberal scoundrel”

I have no doubt it is not all liberals and probably not you but a certain section of liberal have become known for it, with or without justification.

Yes that is a opinion born out by this thread where it is implied, yes I certainly do no shy away from reading between the lines, that not having gay marriage is a grevious sin that needs remedying as soon as possible. But actually I did already give evidence for this, I talked of the EUroplot parliament.

__________________
The Wessex society.

“I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I despise equality.”
John Randolph of Roanoke.

razz

walleye here are the two questions you skipped:

What would you say?

__________________

independent_thinker2002

Interracial marriage wasn't a civil rights issue?

__________________
☠☠☠☠☠

I am a Tiki Bar Tarte, you wanna mount Le Penseur Bronze

walleye

Alcoholism and drug addiction are spiritual diseases in the opinion of many people. I am one of those who hold that view.

Gotta run. I have a gig tonight.

razz

You've done two things here:

1) You contradicted yourself by first saying 'gays have all rights' and now say 'they never had the right to begin with

and

2) So what? Who cares if they never had it? Women never had the right to vote before that was granted either

__________________

CaptainCourtesy

Good. You will NEVER see me go after conservatives in a partisan way except to call them on their partisanship to expose their hypocrisy/weakness in debate. You should know by now that I do not accept weak debating and go after it like a shark after prey.

__________________
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run

====||:-D

Wessexman

No they don't. If you have an IQ of 60 you don't have an equal opportunity to one who has one of 150. What you mean is there is no legal impedement. There is for gays to marry, as there is for thieves to steal DVDs, you are trying to prove why the former should not be but talking about equality in the vague, generalised way you do does not help much.

Group is a vague term.

__________________
The Wessex society.

“I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I despise equality.”
John Randolph of Roanoke.

CaptainCourtesy

Moderator's Warning:

Folks, let's make sure this stays civil. I agree with Wessexman on this point. I do not want to see any personal attacks.

__________________
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run

====||:-D

razz

What are you talking about?

Of course they both have the equal opportunity to achieve high office, just one has a better opportunity to do so because of his intellect...how in the world does that mean the opportunity to achieve it isnt equal?

The men ARE equal, their strengths are NOT

__________________

Wessexman

So? You have to construct an actual argument out of this.

I support gay marriage with caution. I just object to these vague and dangerous appeals to some generalised equality.

__________________
The Wessex society.

“I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I despise equality.”
John Randolph of Roanoke.