- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 28,659
- Reaction score
- 18,803
- Location
- Charleston, South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
According to a lot of people on the cultural Left, and feminists in particular, any form of physical contact, which could be construed as being sexual in nature, without the directly expressly given consent of the person touched, is basically "sexual assault." In other words, a "no" on the part of the woman isn't even required, simply the absence of a spoken "yes." They seek to have laws re-written to reflect this.
In light of that fact, what do you make of the following?
This is the norm in most Jamaican Dance Halls, as far as I'm aware. Guy grabs girl, and just starts roughly dry humping away.
Are all of these women victims of "sexual assault?" Why or why not?
After all, none of them appear to be giving "express consent," as "rape culture" crusaders seem to want as the universal standard. While they seem to go along with it, there is often force involved, and one could easily argue that the women are simply "too afraid" to object.
In light of that fact, what do you make of the following?
This is the norm in most Jamaican Dance Halls, as far as I'm aware. Guy grabs girl, and just starts roughly dry humping away.
Are all of these women victims of "sexual assault?" Why or why not?
After all, none of them appear to be giving "express consent," as "rape culture" crusaders seem to want as the universal standard. While they seem to go along with it, there is often force involved, and one could easily argue that the women are simply "too afraid" to object.
Last edited: