- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 19,899
- Reaction score
- 7,317
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
No he shouldn't.
Correction. He should if his employer says he should.
No he shouldn't.
Correction. He should if his employer says he should.
The real issue is that it's treating the people involved like idiots that can't even make their own decisions towards their own person.
No, I don't support them. If you want to act in porn, you accept the risks that come with the territory. STDs and pregnancy are two of them.
Wow, you want to punish people. You want the job to be risky. You don't want them protected by safety regulations because you want them to suffer.
That's kind of like saying hard hats should be voluntary on a building site, or gloves should be voluntary to health care workers handling blood, or face nets should be voluntary for bee keepers. This is a health and safety at work issue.
Why/Why Not?
No, because like most Americans (I think) I dont like to see condoms in my porn, and the government has no good cause to demand that I do. THis is government overreach, the dreaded Nanny State.
California will vote in 2016 on condoms for porn actors - LA Times