Kind of a weird way to look at responsibility for the action. There is only so much you can do to ensure that you're not tricked, and in the end, the person doing the tricking is still the trans individual and they are responsible for it.
It really isn't that odd. It isn't the doctor's responsibility to make sure his patient doesn't trick someone. It is the person doing the tricking.
But I don't think this is a common occurrence. So I don't believe there is much risk of being tricked. That is even suggesting that most "trans women" are into straight men. All of them I have met prefer women, but the ones that like men aim for bi men. Further they are honest.
I'm curious to know what percentage of trans people are tricking straight men. I doubt it's occurred very often. The percentage of trans people is not even close to 1%, abd because they are just people like everybody else I assume when they are looking for love they are trying to find somebody to share their lives with, so honesty goes a long way. Plus most people want to be loved for who they are, not who somebody thinks they are.
I seriously doubt this trickery exists on any measurable scale. So this attempt to justify telling others how to live is a failed one.
It has been shown, like I said, to cause mental trauma and people have even gotten help for it. I suppose that is somewhat ******d for them to need help to deal with it, but it is true.
So?
Doctors know this kind of behaviors happen and they know that without their actions none of it would have been possible.
Car dealers know drunk driving to be possible behavior, they aren't guilty for the accident caused by their customers.
It's not unreasonable to state they should avoid doing operations that can be done to trick people or leave people otherwise worse off.
Well, that same argument can be made for gun control. Just switch a few words. I'll show you.
It's not unreasonable to state they should avoid selling guns that can be used to kill people or leave people otherwise worse off.
This is why I have no respect for you. You are a raging progressive when politically expedient.
In the end, doctors and other sellers of goods have to consider not only the buyer/patient(which they are ethically failing by mutilating them) but other parties like future people they might harm as a result of the service they are offering.
Sounds like something Barak Obama would say about guns, or his wife would say about fried chicken.
It's always been important, but again, you can only do so much to avoid it.
To avoid just randomly ****ing somebody you don't know? I must be a saint or a very special person, I've never had to avoid that.
People get married to these people without even knowing only to find out years later.
You have any names? Does it amount to a percentage of the population? Do you have any names? Has it really ever occurred?
How many years of their life was taken from them because of doctors and someone that lied to have a relationship with them? How many years were they tricked to live a lie?
Zero. Other than killing somebody I don't know how you can take years away from them. Further a doctor isn't responsible for the lies of his patient. It wouldn't be the doctor's fault for performing a hysterectomy on a woman before she was married and her husband found out she couldn't have kids. It would be completely hers for not saying anything.
I know you need something to justify this feeling you have about trans people and surgery, but this is not logical.
Btw, we actually had a trans poster a few years back that admitted to being married to a guy that didn't know.
One person, assuming they were telling the truth. How terrifying.
Is that guy at fault for being tricked? Is that really your position?
Assuming he is real, no. It is the trans person's fault for not saying so. It definitely isn't their doctor's fault. The doctor didn't lie.
rof
