• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kick in the nuts?

joko104

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
65,981
Reaction score
23,408
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?
 
I don't know that it would be sexual assault, but it's about as low as a low blow can be. If a man kicks a woman in the crotch, is it considered sexual assault, or just assault. I'm pretty sure it's the latter. :)
 
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?

No, obviously.
 
It is a vicious attack that evokes numerous sentiments of brotherhood in all men. We all have experienced the sentiment when we see a woman hitting a man where it hurts the most and suddenly, we feel for ourselves the need to protect our own prized possession.
 
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?

I think the action typically has to be for sexual pleasure on the part of the attacker. In this case, unless the person has a foot fetish, there is no obvious sexual pleasure on the attacker's part.
 
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?

It's only assault if you don't ask the woman to do it.
Police hunt groin weirdo | Metro.co.uk
 
It should be felony aggravated assault (unless done in self-defense against a serious assault).

A kick in the groin can inflict serious and lasting, even permanent, damage. It is no joke, and it is no laughing matter.

Rupturing a man's testicles can ruin his ability to reproduce and cause him ongoing pain and other problems for the rest of his life.


It is about as funny as biting someone's nose off.
 
Last edited:
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?

I think aggravated assault. If you grab a woman's boob, that's sexual assault, but if you punch her boob? I think that would be aggravated assault.

What type of assault it is has to do with the type of unwanted touching and the reason for the touching, not necessarily the location on the body. If someone kicks someone else in the groin, there typically isn't anything sexual about their intent. They're trying to cause pain or injury.
 
I think aggravated assault. If you grab a woman's boob, that's sexual assault, but if you punch her boob? I think that would be aggravated assault.

What type of assault it is has to do with the type of unwanted touching and the reason for the touching, not necessarily the location on the body. If someone kicks someone else in the groin, there typically isn't anything sexual about their intent. They're trying to cause pain or injury.

Pure Assault. As I understand it there would have to be some type of sexual aspect to it (grabbing) for it to be sexual assault
 
Pure Assault. As I understand it there would have to be some type of sexual aspect to it (grabbing) for it to be sexual assault

I don't think it would be regular assault. Regular assault is a threat of bodily harm and ability to do it. No touching is required. Same with sexual assault. You don't have to touch them in order for it to be sexual assault. If you actually make physical contact and it isn't sexual in intent or nature, it becomes aggravated assault.
 
I don't think it would be regular assault. Regular assault is a threat of bodily harm and ability to do it. No touching is required. If you actually make physical contact, it becomes aggravated assault.

I stand correcte you are right
 
Other than for self defense, if a woman kicks a man in the groin is that a sexual assault? Or just an assault? It certainly is touching his genetals without his consent in an assaultive manner. Grabbing a woman's breasts can (and sometimes is) considered a sexual assault.

Whatjathink?

What's the punishment if a man punches a woman in the tit? It should be whatever that is.
 
I don't think it would be regular assault. Regular assault is a threat of bodily harm and ability to do it. No touching is required. Same with sexual assault. You don't have to touch them in order for it to be sexual assault. If you actually make physical contact and it isn't sexual in intent or nature, it becomes aggravated assault.

I did not know you could be charge with assult with out touching someone, how the hell to they get away with that?

As far as charging with sexual assult that would put them on a offenders list wouldnt it. That would be stupid for this kind of case I think.
 
What's the punishment if a man punches a woman in the tit? It should be whatever that is.

I think it should be harsher, honestly. As Goshin pointed out, you can destroy someone's testicles with a hard enough blow, and leave them with medical problems for the rest of their lives.

Boobs are tougher. You'll break her ribs before you seriously injure her breast, actually.

Both are aggravated assault and should be punished harshly, but the harm that can come from a hard blow to the testicles is far more serious.
 
I did not know you could be charge with assult with out touching someone, how the hell to they get away with that?

As far as charging with sexual assult that would put them on a offenders list wouldnt it. That would be stupid for this kind of case I think.

It's essentially a crime of threatening and causing extreme fear in another person. I think that's worthy of punishment.
 
It's essentially a crime of threatening and causing extreme fear in another person. I think that's worthy of punishment.

I dont think it is. Nor should someone be put on a offenders list for that. Especially if the vic wasnt even touched.
 
I dont think it is. Nor should someone be put on a offenders list for that. Especially if the vic wasnt even touched.

The sex offender list is a whole 'nother can of worms, and I won't get started on that because I might never stop. :lol:

But are you saying it should be legal to threaten people, stalk them, spy on them?
 
The sex offender list is a whole 'nother can of worms, and I won't get started on that because I might never stop. :lol:

But are you saying it should be legal to threaten people, stalk them, spy on them?

If no direct harm or violation of property can be proven, then yes. You talking to a guy who believes its perfectly legal to yell fire in a theature, so keep that in mind. They touch em then thats another, ball of wax, and game on.
 
There is nothing sexual about getting kicked in the nads.

We all know that kid who knew a kid that got kicked so hard in school by a girl that he lost one. We stand united! (holding our hands over our crotch like soccer players as we do it)
 
Regardless of whether an assault is considered sexual or not, the determining factor as to how severely an assailant should be punished is how much bodily harm is caused to the victim. Just because someone has a sexual motive for a crime doesn't mean he should be punished more severely than someone who's motive is to inflict great physical damage on a person.
 
We obviously have different ideas about what is funny.


I know, we all laugh when some poor burke gets punted in the yarbles... I've done it too... but the potential for serious and life-changing injury is there and reallio trulio we shouldn't be laughing at that any more than we'd laugh at someone being maimed.

I've known women that think kicking a man in the nads for making a remark they didn't like was an appropriate and humorous reaction.... gals, it ain't. If you luck up and rupture one of his testes, I hope he sues you for half your income for life.
 
I've known women that think kicking a man in the nads for making a remark they didn't like was an appropriate and humorous reaction.... gals, it ain't. If you luck up and rupture one of his testes, I hope he sues you for half your income for life.

How's a woman supposed to make an income after her head's been twisted right the **** off?

My mother never taught me not to hit girls. She just taught me not to hit them first.
 
Back
Top Bottom