Thread: Same-sex couples won't benefit children

Navy's point appears to be that no man should be allowed to join the military if he had children and should be discharged if he is having a child due to no child can be raised properly without a father and military service is dangerous - or he is arguing against monogamy in which a woman should be able to have more than 1 husband.

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

Again there are cases when you have perfect gay partners and lousy straight in a marriage when the gays would be a better to place the child. You really have to look at this from the perspective that all things are equal great straight parents and great gay parents............In that case when all things are equal in every aspect then the best place for any child to be placed would be the great straight parents.

No. That has nothing to do with the post you responded to.

I asked for specifically what a child needs from a mother that they can't get from a man, and what a child needs from a father that they can't get from a woman. Nothing you said answers those questions. Maybe you should try again.

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

I have read may times That when surveys are taken that gays are in the upper portion of the wealthy in this country or at the very least upper middle class so if they want to be sure they can pass on to their partner all their assets when they pass away they should submit the proper documents to do so. I know I would if I were in their place........

Again, what the hell does this have to do with my post? I was commenting on inequality and you try to bring up the normal economic level of homosexuals.

Their economic level doesn't matter. Let me ask again. Should the rich pay more for a marriage license, since you seem to believe it is ok for those in higher incomes to pay more for their legal contracts? Should all poor people, no matter what their sexes, pay nothing for their marriage contract?

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

As I said a dozen times it is better to have a mother and father then 2 parents of the same sex for the traits that they both bring to the table.

Like what exactly? Be as specific as you can and make sure that it is something that every member of a particular sex can bring but no one from the opposite sex can.

Originally Posted by joko104

Navy's point appears to be that no man should be allowed to join the military if he had children and should be discharged if he is having a child due to no child can be raised properly without a father and military service is dangerous - or he is arguing against monogamy in which a woman should be able to have more than 1 husband.

Its amazing how you lefties take everything out of context. Of course I don't believe any of that. I missed many a birthday and holiday and 2 of my childrens birth because I was on deployment mostly off the South China seas in Viet Nam and my wife was a rock in my absence but with all due respect as their father there were so many things I could have done if I had been there. I regret to this day that I could not do it.

Originally Posted by roguenuke

No. That has nothing to do with the post you responded to.

I asked for specifically what a child needs from a mother that they can't get from a man, and what a child needs from a father that they can't get from a woman. Nothing you said answers those questions. Maybe you should try again.

In this very thread we have covered what each parent brings to the table in raising a child...If you have read the thread you know how I feel. Asking me to tell you over and over again what each parent brings to the table in raising a child solves nothing.

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

In this very thread we have covered what each parent brings to the table in raising a child...If you have read the thread you know how I feel. Asking me to tell you over and over again what each parent brings to the table in raising a child solves nothing.

No we haven't. I have only gotten a general "women are nurturing, men are disciplinarians" from you. That is a) not specific and b) things that have nothing to do with sex/gender. Many men are nurturing and many women have no problem handling discipline issues. Heck, I have just had a discipline issue come up with my son. I certainly am not going to wait til my husband gets home for it to be dealt with.

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

As I said a dozen times it is better to have a mother and father then 2 parents of the same sex for the traits that they both bring to the table.

Got any evidence? Because every major study proves you wrong.

Originally Posted by roguenuke

No we haven't. I have only gotten a general "women are nurturing, men are disciplinarians" from you. That is a) not specific and b) things that have nothing to do with sex/gender. Many men are nurturing and many women have no problem handling discipline issues. Heck, I have just had a discipline issue come up with my son. I certainly am not going to wait til my husband gets home for it to be dealt with.

Well let me tell you something, when me and my brother needed discipline my mother would try and do it and we sould laugh at her......The moment she told us that she was going to tell or dad when he got home that got our attention..........There is a perfect example right or wrong why a boy needs a father.

Originally Posted by Omgitsme

Got any evidence? Because every major study proves you wrong.

Yeah right every major study slated to the left by some doped crazed prof.