Originally Posted by justone

Due to certain personal incapables your request about spelling cannot be satisfied. Nobody is forced to reply to justone. As the matter of fact all evolutionists and atheists have put me on ignore list, - at least they say so, - when you run out of arguments you will finish with the same argument..




Hey big boy, where did you find a slightest hint about any conditions or exclusions in the OP?


Can you quote it to me from the OP?

Is my objection to the words of the OP quoted by me and to the meaning of the words is correct? Did I miss anything in the OP?

Yes or no?
Am I correct pointing that the OP is totally misrepresenting E coli?

Can you answer yes or no, - or you would prefer to keep on spinning?


If you prefer to keep on spinning and endlessly adding and correcting your statements, I may abstain from discussion of the page 7900 with no links provided by you, when I have provided my link.

So, let me get it straight – it has been known that some E-coli bacteria under some conditions in the presence of some coenzymes can process citrate and it still remain to be E-coli bacteria.

Am I correct – yes or no?

So, can you come again please, - tell me slowly so I wouldn’t miss a word again - in the experiment on page 7900 E-coli bacteria has evolved into ______________? Would you fill the blank, please?

I am not a biologist, so I am just very curious, big boy. I hope you are a biologist, since you are a big boy, - all evolutionists here are biologists and big boys.

Originally Posted by Resplendent Independent

I'll make it simple for you. You are incorrect on all accounts. It is clear that you are not a biologist, because your attempts to discuss these issues are laughable.

Originally Posted by justone

I have submitted my experience of conversations with evolutionists in the’’ ID and religion’’ threat. You are now confirming again that I have been all correct.

Well,. so far you have not been the worst, the worst are those who spin and twist endlessly just exhausting me out of my time.

This Cut and run move of yours is appreciated by me. I really should get to other things. At least now I know that in your profile Research means research in biology. Why wouldn't you add to in your Occupation in your profile in order to scare all non-biologists?

P.S. Don’t forget to put me on ignore list, big boy biologist.

Originally Posted by Resplendent Independent

By worst I'm assuming you mean I've been the best at dissecting your absurd posts and exposing them as the garbage that they are. Thank you for the compliment.

Originally Posted by justone

You see, it is very easy to know who is who.

My very good friend, Australianlibertarian used to claim that he was working on his PhD in biology. He expressed that he was an evolutionist and an atheist. I never had a doubt in his claims about PhD. I do hope that I have not missed the moment to congratulate him with PhD. I really want to see that happy moment – for him and for me.

Because he has never disgraced his human dignity and decency in our confrontations. So far as I have been knowing him for a year or two..

You are no researcher.

Originally Posted by justone

Assumptions based on assumptions are the way of evolutionists.

No, big boy, I came to appreciation of your ways when you claimed that I was not a biologist and thus I was not worth of your explanations of my mistakes, I was worth nothing but insults you kept on making your research in. That’s all, big boy biologist.

Originally Posted by winston53660

Who in the heck are you talking to?

Originally Posted by Resplendent Independent

Oh you are worth my expectations of your mistakes. I expect that you would make a mistake and you did.

Originally Posted by justone

Thanks for another demonstration of the great intellect of evolutionists-atheists.