• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A new transparent metal has been developed for smartphone and TV displays

Hmmm... No. And "primordial" is not a scientific term. What exactly do you do at the university?
Primordial is sometimes used to mean, the very first things. I irradiate metals with protons.
 
Okay, it's just that "primordial particles" is rarely used. I thought you meant "elementary", which would have been wrong. Still

Periodic-Table-Metals.jpg
 
Okay, it's just that "primordial particles" is rarely used. I thought you meant "elementary", which would have been wrong. Still

Periodic-Table-Metals.jpg
Yes you are right, but I am right also. It's just semantics and it's not a big deal.

"In astronomy and physical cosmology, the metallicity or Z is the fraction of mass of a star or other kind of astronomical object, beyond hydrogen (X) and helium (Y). Most of the physical matter in the universe is in the form of hydrogen and helium, so astronomers conveniently use the blanket term "metals" to refer to all other elements. For example, stars or nebulae that are relatively rich in carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and neon would be "metal-rich" in astrophysical terms, even though those elements are non-metals in chemistry. This term should not be confused with the usual physical definition of solid metals."

This is what I meant when I said the primordial particles allowed the formation of hydrogen and helium very shortly after the big bang. All other elements were created in supernova that occurred thousands or millions of years later, and are sometimes called "metals". So everything is some form of metal in this definition, but it is not very precise. I agree with you, it's better to call this new transparent material a non-metal. Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Doubt it will make smart phones cheaper, but it'll sure make them more profitable to sell.

Since when do reduced input costs mean that profit maximization won't happen?
 
Back
Top Bottom