- Joined
- Dec 21, 2013
- Messages
- 13,309
- Reaction score
- 1,307
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
.... Nobody is claiming "space," just some rocks in it.
Did they put these rocks in space?
.... Nobody is claiming "space," just some rocks in it.
Did they put these rocks in space?
Nobody put oil in the ground but people still claim it when they build a rig on top of it.
Yes, after taking effective possession of the oil.
Keep in mind that oil is personal, rather than real property.
And after taking effective possession of a space rock...
also what if my asteroid hits yours and they both blow up.Kind of interesting that such a bill is even needed to be honest. AFAIK no one and no country has any claim to anything that is not on this Earth with the exception of man made objects in orbit of course. Even the moon has not been actually claimed for any person or country. As such I don't really see how our government (or any government for that matter) would even have the power to make such a bill since they don't own it.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the bill per se. I'm just wondering what kind of power the government actually thinks it has for this type of bill.
Do you understand the difference between real and personal property?
I'm not understanding the difference between oil in the ground and palladium in a space rock.
If you read the article title correctly it says "asteroid resource property rights" (emphasis added). It doesn't say anything about owning the asteroid itself, just the "asteroid resources they obtain". I don't see a problem there.How ridiculous. Men cannot own the heavens.
I wasn't talking about the metals within, I was talking about the asteroids themselves.
What would Obammy do if terrorists were on the moon?