Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Welcome to our political forum > Battle Grounds and Disputations > Reverse Debates

Reverse Debates Reverse Debate #2: Abortion; Originally Posted by Jerry Your just upset because you wanted Pro-Life to win Right again!...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-06, 11:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
...It's a state of being

 
Felicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 08:25 AM
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,018
Thanked 977 Times in 799 Posts

Awards:
Private Debates:  Felicity has participated in a Private Debate. Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
Your just upset because you wanted Pro-Life to win
Right again!
__________________
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
While I thought that I was learning how to live, I have been learning how to die. ~*Leonardo Da Vinci*~
Felicity is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Inline Ads
Old 12-30-06, 11:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
...It's a state of being

 
Felicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 08:25 AM
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,018
Thanked 977 Times in 799 Posts

Awards:
Private Debates:  Felicity has participated in a Private Debate. Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 View Post
No, I seriously can't think of anything else... but partly, I think the "lameness'" can be attributed to Jerry; he "won", if you can call it that, by refusing to play the game and merely saying "I'm right, and if you can't prove otherwise, then the debate's over" repeatedly. Of course he is right, and so neither I nor anybody else can prove otherwise, and so I guess the debate's over.
But, you know... he could've gotten into the spirit of it a bit more. He volunteered for this; it's not like anybody forced him.

On a brighter note, LeftyHenry did finally PM me back and say that yes, he did want to debate abortion tag-team style with me, but of course by the time I heard back from him it was already too late, so now he's ready, willing, and available to RD any one of you on abortion.
Have at it.
This is so transparent...I can't believe after all your build-up and criticising me for exactly what you say above here, that you volunteer to be so OBVIOUS. Truly...I guess I gave you more credit for sincerity and dignity. See...that's why I wouldn't get sucked in--I figured as much, but I secretly hoped you'd prove me wrong on it. Oh well. At least you didn't get too hysterically mocking, although the Norma McCorvey stuff bordered on it
Felicity is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-06, 12:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
Revenge of the Organic

 
Thelost1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Last Online: 02-26-08 10:23 PM
Location: Warshington
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 135
Thanked 124 Times in 91 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Is someone a sore loser, Felicity?
__________________
Emphasis added.

"The religion of one age is the literary entertainment of the next."
~Emerson
Thelost1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-06, 12:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
...It's a state of being

 
Felicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 08:25 AM
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,018
Thanked 977 Times in 799 Posts

Awards:
Private Debates:  Felicity has participated in a Private Debate. Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thelost1 View Post
Is someone a sore loser, Felicity?
Who?....Me?
Felicity is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-06, 12:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Soup Kitchen Celebrity

 
1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 06:17 AM
Posts: 12,078
Thanks: 3,245
Thanked 1,817 Times in 1,373 Posts

Awards:
Asshat of the year:  Winner of the Debate Politics 2008 Asshat of the Year Award. Congratulations! Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Thread Starter Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity View Post
This is so transparent...I can't believe after all your build-up and criticising me for exactly what you say above here, that you volunteer to be so OBVIOUS. Truly...I guess I gave you more credit for sincerity and dignity. See...that's why I wouldn't get sucked in--I figured as much, but I secretly hoped you'd prove me wrong on it. Oh well. At least you didn't get too hysterically mocking, although the Norma McCorvey stuff bordered on it
I have no idea what you're talking about; all my build-up?
You're the one who wanted me to agree to a bunch of weird conditions before you'd debate me. I said no to all of them. I'm not going to agree to any conditions no matter who I'm debating, or what the topic is.
I never claimed I'd be good at reverse debate; I'd never tried it before. I wanted to try it. Now that I've tried it, I plan to do more reverse debates. I think it's fun, and hopefully I'll get better at it.
I chose the "pro-life feminist" argument because it intrigues me; prolife feminists are a group of people who claim to be "different" from other prolifers, who claim they are "pro-woman" and that they can justify banning abortion without stooping to typical, anti-woman "sex is bad, you should've kept your legs shut" rhetoric.
So I studied up on them and familiarized myself with their platform, and I tried to debate the issue using their arguments. But it turns out that their arguments are very self-limiting, and you can't get very far with them before you have to resort to other tactics, to arguments I consider "anti-woman"... in which case you'd have to start contradicting everything you just said, leaving yourself with zero credibility. What I've really learned out of this is that the two positions are pretty much logically incompatible. The "prolife feminist" rhetoric only holds up superficially... beyond that, there's no solid way to justify or defend such a position.
So, you know... live and learn.

On a more personal note, I think you give me way too much credit, and attribute all sorts of sterling characteristics to me that you have no reason to believe I possess.
You wouldn't be so perpetually disappointed in me if you'd stop attributing all these admirable characteristics to me in the first place.
This is a debate forum, and I'm here to play, learn, and entertain myself, just like everyone else.

The next RD I'm going to attempt is a Smoking Ban one with Galenrox; LeftyHenry wants to debate abortion from the pro-life side, if anyone's interested.
Maybe Jerry should debate him, since he seems to be on a winning streak.
__________________
"I do love this idea that one can scream and scream and scream, with that utopia just one more scream away."
~ Scucca
1069 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-06, 12:48 PM   #16 (permalink)
...It's a state of being

 
Felicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 08:25 AM
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,018
Thanked 977 Times in 799 Posts

Awards:
Private Debates:  Felicity has participated in a Private Debate. Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 View Post
I have no idea what you're talking about; all my build-up?
I simply meant your seeking an opponant and identifying what an opportunity to view things from another perspective. You sure give up easily.

Quote:
I wanted to try it. Now that I've tried it, I plan to do more reverse debates. I think it's fun, and hopefully I'll get better at it.
Getting better at it would be good--it would make for more interesting reading.


Quote:
The "prolife feminist" rhetoric only holds up superficially... beyond that, there's no solid way to justify or defend such a position.
So, you know... live and learn.
I don't think you went very in-depth with your research if that is your conclusion.

Quote:
On a more personal note, I think you give me way too much credit,
I probably do. I do tend to expect the best of people. I know it opens me up to disappointment, but all in all, I think it is a good trait, so forgive me if I assume you are not shallow and completely self-absorbed.
Felicity is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-06, 09:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
What'll it be?
Tavern Wench


 
talloulou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Last Online: Today 03:06 AM
Location: Tiamat's better half
Posts: 10,556
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,675 Times in 1,185 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Female

Current Mood:
Goofy
Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Since 1069 went with the whole abortion oppresses women thing I think she should have pointed out that females are aborted more frequently than males and that feticide as well as genocide is practiced routinely in India and China where you have women killing their own daughters because they'd prefer a son.
talloulou is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-06, 01:41 AM   #18 (permalink)
Soup Kitchen Celebrity

 
1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 06:17 AM
Posts: 12,078
Thanks: 3,245
Thanked 1,817 Times in 1,373 Posts

Awards:
Asshat of the year:  Winner of the Debate Politics 2008 Asshat of the Year Award. Congratulations! Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Thumbs up Thread Starter Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by talloulou View Post
Since 1069 went with the whole abortion oppresses women thing I think she should have pointed out that females are aborted more frequently than males and that feticide as well as genocide is practiced routinely in India and China where you have women killing their own daughters because they'd prefer a son.
Well, that's an idea.
I'll probably try a broader, more general approach next time, rather than such a specific and limited one.
That will be this coming Monday, when LeftyHenry and I will reverse-debate Jerry and some other prolifer (I don't know who yet); the topic will again be abortion, and I will again be debating from a prolife angle.
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. That's my motto!
1069 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-06, 06:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
Professor

 
LeftyHenry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 06-08-08 11:47 AM
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,929
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Awards:
Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Angry
Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

Quote:
Originally Posted by talloulou View Post
Since 1069 went with the whole abortion oppresses women thing I think she should have pointed out that females are aborted more frequently than males and that feticide as well as genocide is practiced routinely in India and China where you have women killing their own daughters because they'd prefer a son.
Well genocide is a stretch but you make a good point.

So this is my confirmation post for the RD tommorow. Who is the other prolife defending pro-choice?
__________________
Will You Stand up for the Human Race?
LeftyHenry is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-06, 07:19 PM   #20 (permalink)
...It's a state of being

 
Felicity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 08:25 AM
Posts: 8,088
Thanks: 1,018
Thanked 977 Times in 799 Posts

Awards:
Private Debates:  Felicity has participated in a Private Debate. Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Re: Reverse Debate #2: Abortion

I think it's me...but I haven't heard from Jerry in a while.
Felicity is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Political Cartoons
44 photos
8 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO