- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 19,612
- Reaction score
- 7,713
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Depends -- most believe it's just a ceremony. Some believe it is the actual washing away of sins.
Who are these "some"?
Depends -- most believe it's just a ceremony. Some believe it is the actual washing away of sins.
https://gotquestions.org/baptism-Acts-2-38.htmlThose who don't believe it's just a symbolic gesture would quote Acts 2:38 -- Acts 2:38New International Version (NIV)
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Peter tells the crowd they must repent and be baptized in order to have their sins forgiven.
Who are these "some"?
Who are these "some"?
Catholics believe it. And some offshoots of the catholic faith.
That is why they hold baby baptisms
Churches of Christ believe that baptism is essential and it's literally the washing away of your sins. Churches of Christ aren't anywhere close to the Catholic faith and don't baptize babies.
Depends however according to the Bible it is a symbolic gesture.
Those who don't believe it's just a symbolic gesture would quote Acts 2:38 -- Acts 2:38New International Version (NIV)
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Peter tells the crowd they must repent and be baptized in order to have their sins forgiven.
I understand the Catholic concept behind it. I just don't see that in the Bible at all.
Nope non-traditional
This:
You quoted Act 2:38, which is quoted in the link I gave you from Catholic Answers. That's what they see in the bible.
I was baptized Catholic, attended sporadically throughout my life, for my Catholic family. But I would not say I've ever been a practicing Catholic. I understand where they are coming from. For them, my baptism was more than just symbolic. My great-grandma freaked out when my parents drove me to Chicago as a new born, before baptizing me. "You risked her eternal soul in driving here before baptizing her!"
She was genuinely upset they did that, though the point of the trip was to baptize me in the same church my father was. LOL
Various other Catholic members of my family have been troubled that my children were not baptized as infants. I couldn't do it if I can't say honestly I would raise them as Catholics. Again, it's much more than symbolic for Catholics.
By "non-traditional," do you mean non-denominational?
This:
You quoted Act 2:38, which is quoted in the link I gave you from Catholic Answers. That's what they see in the bible.
I was baptized Catholic, attended sporadically throughout my life, for my Catholic family. But I would not say I've ever been a practicing Catholic. I understand where they are coming from. For them, my baptism was more than just symbolic. My great-grandma freaked out when my parents drove me to Chicago as a new born, before baptizing me. "You risked her eternal soul in driving here before baptizing her!"
She was genuinely upset they did that, though the point of the trip was to baptize me in the same church my father was. LOL
Various other Catholic members of my family have been troubled that my children were not baptized as infants. I couldn't do it if I can't say honestly I would raise them as Catholics. Again, it's much more than symbolic for Catholics.
I agree that it is more than symbolic, however biblically speaking baptism alone can't save anyone.
the only way to salvation is by faith and acceptance of Jesus Christ as savior.
yes non-denominational/reformation theological.
You should check out John Piper's book Future grace.
also Upmost for his Highest.
And Episcopalians and Lutherans too. My best friend was a non-churchgoing Southern Baptist who married a non-churchgoing Episcopalian, and the birth of their first son sparked a terrible fight between them. Both sets of grandparents were devout churchgoers in their respective denoms, and my friend's father-in-law was the canon to the bishop of the Episcopal diocese, and his brother-in-law was also an Episcopalian priest.
The resolution to the conflict was that their children weren't baptized and never went to church unless for a funeral.
In your faith and religion. That is not the belief of all faiths.
The fact my children were recently baptized in a different Christian religion, did give a measure of relief to the Catholics in my family. As long as they were baptized, it's all good.
Again I can only point to what the Bible says. It is pretty clear.
And so the Catholics believe it is too.
babies can't ask for forgiveness. they have no concept of right or wrong. So baptizing a baby can't save them.
That's one of the fundamental differences in beliefs. You can argue all you would like because that is what your faith dictates. The catholic faith believes differently. Baptism washes away original sin. They don't need to be able to ask forgiveness.
I'm totally out of my element here. I'm just saying what I know of the Catholic faith and my experience, as limited as that is.
Baptism is following in Christ footsteps of death burial and resurrection. It is an outspoken expression of an inward impression.
Baptism alone cannot save you, but it is a symbol that you accepted Christ as your savior.
The Lords supper is remembering what Christ did on the cross for you. How his body was broken and his blood spilt.
It's not protestant -- it's just Bible. Catholics take communion and perform baptisms (although they baptize infants - which I've never understood).
I agree that it is more than symbolic, however biblically speaking baptism alone can't save anyone.
the only way to salvation is by faith and acceptance of Jesus Christ as savior.
For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
Matt 7:1212*So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.
Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22*Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23*Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers
it has nothing to do with my faith. it has to do with what the bible says.
no only asking forgiveness in Jesus Christ can wash away your sin.
I know what Catholics say but it is contrary to what the bible says.
For by grace are you saved through faith in Jesus Christ not of works least any man should boast.
even in the book of acts it says to repent and believe in Jesus Christ.
How can a baby do that?
I am not criticizing but asking more of a theological question.
1 John 1:9
If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
babies can do neither as they have no concept of sin or right or wrong.
"Sola Fide" Salvation by Faith alone is only accepted by Protestants. The majority of Christianity (Catholic and Orthodox) believe in a "works" component to salvation. The idea of Sola Fide comes from Pauline scripture. Paul was not a disciple, did not know Jesus, and did not become a Christian until after his death. Further Paul was not part of the Church of Jerusalem (founded after the death of Jesus and led by James - Brother of Jesus) and his doctrine was at odds with the doctrine of the Church of Jerusalem and ..... The Doctrine of Jesus.
No that is just the aspects of a Christian. Works cannot get you into heaven. If they could then there would be no need for christ's sacrifice.Matt 5-7 is Jesus's most famous sermon (Sermon on the Mount). In this sermon Jesus describes what is required to get through the pearly gates.
There is not one word about faith in this sermon. No "Worship me" No "believe in me and be saved". The sermon is works works and more works.
Christ was quite humble (which is what poor in spirit means).Jesus opens the sermon with “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" is this not the antithesis to "Faith" ?
Christ fulfilled the law.Jesus then praises good works ... talks about obedience to the law and says
By righteousness Jesus meant good works (lack of bad things). This is clear from the context of the passage. He sets the bar low as he did not think much of the Pharisees.
Jesus then goes on for the rest of Matt 5, 6 and most of 7 talking about doing good works and living a good life. Do not Murder, commit adultery, ... Judge not ... Pray in Private (don't be a hypocrite) and so on. The will of the Father
Jesus then sum's up "the will of the Father" with the Golden Rule ( The Rock on which Jesus bases his Teachings) "Do unto others as you would have them do to you" Matt 7:12
Jesus then says:
Not everyone who "has Faith- believes in Jesus" gets through the gates. "ONLY those who do the will of the Father" = works works works.
I am not sure what bible you are using but they do not contradict each other at all.You are talking about what Paul (the Bible) says as opposed to what Jesus says. The two contradict each other. Paul and Jesus are not on the same page in relation to how one get's through the pearly gates.
In Mark and Matt there is no (ask Jesus for forgiveness and you automatically get through the pearly gates). This is important because all other of the Synoptic Gospels use Mark as source material. Mark is also the earliest Gospel and the only one with a reasonably legitimate claim to the disciples. The author of Mark was reputed to be a student and follower under Peter.
John is a Pauline Hellenic Fusion work written decades after Mark at a time after the Jewish Temple had been destroyed and the influence of the Pauline Christians was starting to assert itself over that of the Judeo Christians (Church of Jerusalem). And in fact the animosity of the Church towards Jews (and Judaism was increasing)
protestant's and catholics approach spirituality in very different ways but many protestant churches baptize infants too
I do understand
I was raised as a catholic although I no longer would label myself as a Christian since I do not accept the concept that Christ is the only way
I never said he was so that is a strawman argument. Paul constantly refers to himself as an apostle.
No his doctrine was consistant with everything including the church at Jerusalem and at time he had to admonish the disciples For leaving what Christ had taught at times.
I agree that it is more than symbolic, however biblically speaking baptism alone can't save anyone.
the only way to salvation is by faith and acceptance of Jesus Christ as savior.
No that is just the aspects of a Christian. Works cannot get you into heaven. If they could then there would be no need for christ's sacrifice.
I am the way the truth and the light and no man comes to the father but through me.
Unless you would like to say Christ is wrong in this regard.
Christ was quite humble (which is what poor in spirit means).
Christ fulfilled the law.
Our righteousness is as filthy rags.
Actually it is love God with all your heart mind and soul and love your neighbor as yourself.
umm and many will come to me in that day saying we have cast out demons and healed the sick in your name.
And I will say get thee hence you workers of iniquity for I never knew you.