- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 21,050
- Reaction score
- 3,211
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No it's not. Even the Bible itself disagrees. 1 Timothy 3:15: "if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth."
Back to substance and accidents, you didn't answer the question. Why did Aristotle define the concepts? What paradox did it refute?
Here's a nice primer on why you need a division between accident and substance to explain change:
Aristotle on Change
And another good source:
http://www.aquinasonline.com/Topics/change.html
Look, I try to provide as much grace as I can to posters who are honestly and carefully trying to present their beliefs, but if you read through the BCP I supplied you will see that the character of our Eucharistic service is decidedly Eastern in thought and in many ways taken from the Patristic period, and therefore wholly authentic, if not Roman Catholic. It is designed to be in harmony with both early Church practices and scripture.
Furthermore, I do not "challenge Church authority" because I am a duly ordained minister of the Church Catholic, complete with three lines of succession that date back to the ancient Church.